@firefly,
Quote:Why should we have a statute of limitations in serious sex crimes? Does the mere passage of time make the crime any less serious
Because the accused have rights, which wither with time. So long as the man is guilty until he proves himself to be innocent he needs to be given a reasonable chance to prove his innocents.
Quote:Why should we have a statute of limitations in serious sex crimes?
five or ten years that we had was about right. and I would put in a longer term for stranger rape in case the perp should turn up. I dont agree with the 25 years to life that we are going with in all DNA cases though, because if the man is known to the woman she needs to decide what she wants to do, waiting years to make an accusation and thus depraving the defendant of his right to defend himself, plus being able to use a charge as blackmail for 25 to life, is not consistent with justice.
Quote:Loopholes are ways to circumvent the law
loopholes are very often a means to hammer those who we want to hammer,justice be damned.
Quote:We have discussed women as crime victims--when they have been raped. Rape is a crime. Women who are raped have been victimized by a rapist
have you ever noticed that you talk about crime as if it were violation od law handed down by God? We decide law, we can change law, we have changed sex law a lot in recent years, and sometimes when we make changes we go too far or don't think things through or are snookered by radical groups with an agenda that we did not pick up on when we originally decided on the law. We have lots of people sitting in jail who probably should not be, because of poor lawmaking....those on small time drug charges are tops on my list, but we are aiming to do the same damage with poor sex law. I object.