25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
Ionus
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 02:02 am
@Oylok,
Quote:
So what! So what if girls start off at 14 points?
What happened to equality ? Didnt the libby lobby want equality ? Who are they aiming to be equal with, because they are in front of males.

Quote:
Couldn't there be places on the PAT where boys regularly score higher than girls score--possibly by as much as, say ... 14 points? I
Do you know what an average is ?
Ionus
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 02:07 am
If women are to be protected even when they commit a crime, how much protection must they get when they claim they are the victim ?
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 03:41 am
@Ionus,
Quote:
Didnt the libby lobby want equality
Long long ago, before they got the great idea that they could do better for themselves...yes.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 08:31 am
@Ionus,
Hell look at the sentences handed down to 30 something women who had have sex with fourteen something boys and compare that to the the sentencing of men who had have sex with with young girls.

Taking special note if the women happen to be good looking.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 09:59 am
This thread began with a discussion of a TV ad from Scotland designed to bring attention to date rape, rape laws, and the problem of victim blaming.

Now the sexual assault laws in Scotland have been significantly revised in order to legally address the problem of rape, including date rape, and other sexual offense issues.

The new laws take into account modern lifestyles and more clearly shift blame for the crime of rape to where it rightly belongs--on the shoulders of the rapist.
Quote:
1 December 2010
New sex offence laws now in force in Scotland

New laws on sexual offences, which include for the first time a legal definition of consent, have come into force in Scotland.

The Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act defines consent and allows one party to withdraw it at any stage, whether they initially gave consent or not.

The act also gives a legal recognition of male rape.

Rape Crisis Scotland welcomed the changes and said more had to be done to improve rape conviction rates.

Crown Office figures indicated that 35% of rape cases brought to court resulted in a rape conviction in 2007-08.

But statistics obtained by Rape Crisis Scotland also showed that of the 821 cases recorded by police in 2008-09, just 25 resulted in a conviction in the courts, with only 83 suspects facing court proceedings.

These figures include cases where more than one complaint was made, or where a charge of rape was reduced to a more minor offence.

The new law on sexual offences includes for the first time a legal definition of rape, and recognises men as well as women can be victims.
It also lays out what is meant by consent to sexual intercourse; what it calls "free agreement."

It says if a person is incapable through alcohol or drugs, or is asleep or unconscious, they can not be said to have given their free agreement.

The act also introduces onto the statute book offences such as voyeurism and flashing.

Like rape itself, these have previously been prosecuted under Common Law, which is uncodified and therefore less specific.

For instance, peeping Tom activity - voyeurism - could have been prosecuted under breach of the peace.
But there have been challenges to that law as it is seen as a catch-all legal provision.

Other offences outlined in the act include the sending of indecent images by computer or text for the sexual gratification of the sender, and sexual coercion - forcing someone into sexual activity or making them be present when sexual activity was taking place.

The police chiefs' organisation Acpos said the implementation of the new laws would increase the number of reported rapes.

A raft of new crimes have now been enacted by the act, including coercing others to engage in any form of sexual activity without their consent, forcing someone to view pornography, to have sex while someone else is watching or sending sexually explicit e-mails or texts.

The law also includes "protective measures" to safeguard those with limited or no capacity to consent due to their young age or a mental disorder.

And sexual exposure - commonly known as "flashing" - is also now legally prohibited by statute.

The new powers will also clamp down on "sex tourism" by enabling the prosecution of any Scot who procures sex with a minor abroad, and also allows law enforcement agencies to pursue Scots who commit a sex crime - as defined under Scots law - on anyone under 18 anywhere in the world, regardless of the law in that country.

Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said: "Sexual offences are among the most appalling imaginable, particularly when the victims are among the more vulnerable members of our communities.

"Until now, sexual offences law has been a complex mix of common law and statute. This act therefore improves public safety and helps the victims of sexual crimes by bringing clarity and increased certainty to prosecutions."

Assistant Chief Constable Iain Livingstone, from the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland, said: "Widening the definition of rape to be non-gender specific and include activity previously reported as other types of sexual crime is welcomed.

"However, with this should come acknowledgement that a broader definition will result in an increase in police recorded figures for rape."

Sandy Brindley, national co-ordinator for Rape Crisis Scotland, has welcomed the changes, particularly clarification of what is meant by consensual sex.

"Another really important area the law looks at in terms of consent is whether someone is too drunk to consent to sex," she said.

"I think this is where the law has a really important educational function."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-11885686

_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
Quote:
1st December
Fife police welcome changes to rape laws

FIFE police have welcomed changes to the laws that cover sexual offences and the closure of a “loophole” which allowed the accused to question rape victims’ behaviour.

A new Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 became law yesterday (Wednesday) and a campaign, titled ‘Drinking is not a crime – rape is’, was launched in Fife to highlight the changes.

The act will replace the common law offence of rape with a statutory offence that is broader in terms of sexual activities and includes, for the first time, male rape.

DCI Lee Dickson said, “This is a significant piece of legislation that seeks to address a range of offending behaviour in one clear act and address the law in relation to reflecting modern lifestyles.

“Most importantly it looks to help fill the loophole often exploited by offenders by questioning the behaviour of the victim and cynically relying on an argument of consent to what has taken place.

“I cannot think of other crimes where the character of the victim has so often been questioned in order to provide the accused with an excuse.

“This helps to place the blame squarely where it belongs, on the shoulders of the guilty.”

Rape will continue to be investigated by senior detectives along with support from specialist trained liaison officers but the way in which sexual offences are defined and categorised is changing and how they are dealt with subsequently through the justice process.

Police said a difference in categorising and recording means there was an expectation that the reporting of rape would increase.

The campaign’s message is: no matter how much she’s drunk, no matter what she is wearing, no matter if you have already kissed – sex without consent is rape.

Jan Swan, manager of the Fife Rape and Sexual Assault Centre, said, “We are delighted to be working with Fife Constabulary on this campaign.

"It is really important that we challenge attitudes and make it very clear to men that no matter what a woman is wearing, if she was out with him socially, or has had a drink – sex without consent is rape.

“It is about time we stopped blaming the victim and put the blame squarely on the shoulders of the offender, the rapist.

http://www.dunfermlinepress.com/news/roundup/articles/2010/12/01/407730-fife-police-welcome-changes-to-rape-laws/


To repeat the message...because it bears repeating...
"It is really important that we challenge attitudes and make it very clear to men that no matter what a woman is wearing, if she was out with him socially, or has had a drink – sex without consent is rape.

“It is about time we stopped blaming the victim and put the blame squarely on the shoulders of the offender, the rapist.

BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 11:37 am
@firefly,
Quote:
allows one party to withdraw it at any stage, whether they initially gave consent or not.


One can only hope that the law would give poor males longer then then the 7 seconds that a state of Massachusetts ruling did to react to some woman canceling consent in the middle of sexual intercourse!!!!

Quote:
The act also gives a legal recognition of male rape It says if a person is incapable through alcohol or drugs, or is asleep or unconscious, they can not be said to have given their free agreement.

It says if a person is incapable through alcohol or drugs, or is asleep or unconscious, they can not be said to have given their free agreement. It says if a person is incapable through alcohol or drugs, or is asleep or unconscious, they can not be said to have given their free agreement.


So women are in then in danger of being charge with rape if they had sex with a drunken boyfriend?

Can not wait for the first case of that happening or even more amusing the two parties charging each other with rape as both was drunk at the time.

Quote:
forcing someone to view pornography, to have sex while someone else is watching or .


How do you force someone to view pornography by duck taping them to a chair in front of a computer? Doing so seem to be cover by other laws now without a need for more laws.

Quote:
sending sexually explicit e-mails or texts


So if I send my wife an email of a sexual nature she could out of the blue have me charge with a crime?

How do you work this you need to ask the person you are about to send such a message to if it ok first every time you do so?

Quote:
as defined under Scots law - on anyone under 18 anywhere in the world, regardless of the law in that country.


You mean that if a Scots would have sex with someone at the age of consent in a US state such being in many cases 16 or 17 years old he would be charge with a crime even if his actions are completely legal in the US?

That made sense not.

Quote:
However, with this should come acknowledgement that a broader definition will result in an increase in police recorded figures for rape."


That should warm your heart Firefly that more events will be counted as rape that never was before maybe even reversing the true situation that in many places such as the US real rape had nose dive over the last few decades.

To sum up thank to the worldwide efforts of such as Firefly a male can be label a rapist at the whim of his female partner it would seem.

0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 11:40 am
@firefly,
Quote:
To repeat the message...because it bears repeating...
"It is really important that we challenge attitudes and make it very clear to men that no matter what a woman is wearing, if she was out with him socially, or has had a drink – sex without consent is rape.

“It is about time we stopped blaming the victim and put the blame squarely on the shoulders of the offender, the rapist.
For old definition rape that makes sense,for new definition rape it does not. In no other realm of personal interaction but for when sexual assault is claimed can you walk into a relationship therapists office and get away with blaming your partner for everything and taking no responsibility for your own actions. The therapist is going to ask pesky little questions like "why did you drink so much?" or "what did you think was going to happen when you went to his apartment?". Ya, the rapist is even with new definition rape responsible for the last push, and we should hold him responsible for that, but there was a whole chain of events before that, a string of opportunities before for both individuals to do things differently, for prudence to be exercised, for communication to be improved. We do us all a disfavor by telling the women "dont worry about what you did/didn't do, it was all his fault".
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 11:45 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

as I said, at some point it probably did turn into rape even if it did not start out as such.


Is there a difference?
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 11:52 am
@Intrepid,
Quote:
Is there a difference?
from the POV of the guys no...from the POV of the girl ya, it would mean that she could have made different choices and by doing so avoided being raped. Hopefully next time she will.
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:06 pm
@hawkeye10,
NO NO NO women should never never be taught to communicate in a clear and frank manner with possible sexual partners Hawkeye or used commonsense for that matter.

To indicate that any sexual behavior on a woman part is unwise is placing at least part of the "blame"/responsibility on the female for any undesire outcomes and that is clearly not allow in our culture.


The risk and burden of sex is only with the male never never the female.










Arella Mae
 
  2  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:16 pm
When it all comes down to responsibility who is responsible when a murder is committed? Answer: The one that commited it. Who is responsible for the bank being robbed? Answer: The bank robber. So, who is responsible for the rape? Answer: THE RAPIST!

There is no excuse for murder. There is no excuse for robbing a bank. There is no excuse for rape. Our actions are OUR OWN. I am glad to see that law is trying to make that a bit more clear.

If a man doesn't have enough self-control that he just can't pass up raping an unconscious woman, HE'S NO MAN! HE'S A COWARD!
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:16 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
The risk and burden of sex is only with the male never never the female
Thus women today are becoming like the spoiled princes of old, who when they got in trouble had a stand in take their beatings for them.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:24 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Ya, the rapist is even with new definition rape responsible for the last push, and we should hold him responsible for that, but there was a whole chain of events before


What occured before does not matter, it is only that "last push"--the actual sex act--that must occur with freely willing consent.

We are not talking about sending messages to women about how they should behave, women have been getting such prevention tips for ages--this law is sending a message to men, about what is legal sexual behavior and what is rape.

Laws are written to define crimes.
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:29 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
When it all comes down to responsibility who is responsible when a murder is committed? Answer: The one that commited it. Who is responsible for the bank being robbed? Answer: The bank robber. So, who is responsible for the rape? Answer: THE RAPIST!

that went by the boards when we removed the demand that women at least say no or physically resist. Now we are all about consent, and since consent is a two party operation it takes two people to make the consent process work. What you and Firefly dont want to acknowledge is that often when the consent process brakes down both people had a hand in the breakdown, because often the nature of the breakdown is fully caused by the failure of communication. Firefly saying "the man needs to make sure he has consent" does not work because she has just made the man in charge, and responsible for knowing the mind of his woman, which is a violation of the dynamics of an equality based relationship.

If I as am a man am to be fully responsible for my woman then the law must again recognized her as such, as I am told to treat her like property. If this is to be so then I demand full property rights.
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:30 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
What occured before does not matter
I am well aware that this is what you believe. I do not agree.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:34 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
If a man doesn't have enough self-control that he just can't pass up raping an unconscious woman, HE'S NO MAN! HE'S A COWARD!


Show me one posting by anyone who claimed that it is not rape to have sex with an unconscious female?

Just one little posting of the thousands on this thread.

You are becoming or are as dishonest as Firefly and that is very dishonest indeed.

Jesus would not be proud of you.
Arella Mae
 
  3  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:37 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
If a man doesn't have enough self-control that he just can't pass up raping an unconscious woman, HE'S NO MAN! HE'S A COWARD!


Show me one posting by anyone who claimed that it is not rape to have sex with an unconscious female?

Just one little posting of the thousands on this thread.

You are becoming or are as dishonest as Firefly and that is very dishonest indeed.
I am going to answer this one post and then no more. You, Ionus, and Hawkeye have made it BLATANTLY clear that if a woman is drunk and consents to sex it is not rape. UNDER THE LAW, that is no different than her being unconscious. If you can't control YOURSELF it's YOUR problem, not the woman's.
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:43 pm
@Arella Mae,
It's very clear that the only men who would protest such laws are those who feel "entitled" to non consensual sex, and deeply resent the fact that the female has the power to give or withhold her consent.

To such men, an unconscious or barely conscious woman, is extremely attractive as a sex object--she can't reject them, they don't have to bother with foreplay or gratifying her, and they can essentially use her as a masturbation device and kid themselves that they've made another "conquest" and are, therefore, virile.

These men or, more accurately, these undetected rapists, have such a shaky sense of their "masculinity" that they have to dominate and control a female sexually--so they need females who offer the least resistance--extremely intoxicated 22 year olds, 89 year olds in nursing home beds, intimidated wives--her subordination proves to their warped minds that they are really "men".
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:44 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
UNDER THE LAW, that is no different than her being unconscious. If you can't control YOURSELF it's YOUR problem, not the woman's.


You are not lawyer that is for sure and that is not the law in most states.

So any drinking at all by a couple mean that the woman had lost the right to consent to sex as if she was unconscious however a male does not loss that right to consent or no consent is needed of him so a woman who had sex with a drunken boyfriend had done nothing wrong in your opinion?

Sex is always the male problem and responsibility never never the female no matter who is intoxicated or any other factor.

To sum up a woman can declare her sexual partner a rapist at her whim anytime she care to.



0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 3 Dec, 2010 12:53 pm
@firefly,
So firefly I had once a sexual partner that did not drink at all and yet she had sex with me when I was under the influence so did she rape me as I was unable to grant "free consent" at the time by your lights at least.

Surely under your and AM theory if I had been the one not drinking and have sex with a partner that was under the influence she could afterward declare such sex a rape and have me lock up as a rapist so was my non-drinking sexual partner also a "undetected rapist".

Or are you going back to an earlier position of yours that only a male can rape?
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 07/13/2025 at 08:39:30