25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 11:21 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Rape is non consensual, it is an unwanted sexual assault.


And therein lies the problem.
I am not excusing rape, nor am I defending a rapist at all.
I know how devestating it is for a woman, my sister was raped when she was 18. She is 50 now and it still haunts her sometimes.

However, and this is where I think Bill and others have an argument with you, in some cases the sex was consensual, and after the woman suffers "buyers remorse" about the person she had sex with, then it becomes a rape case.

You are saying that no matter what, its still rape.
Bill is saying, IMHO, that in that case it isnt rape, no matter what the woman says.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 11:23 am
@mysteryman,
The argument those two have is every single case of rape that has been posted on this thread or talked about is they blame the victim. We all know there are those that falsely accuse and we have all said time and time again that those who do that should be dealt with to the fullest extent of the law.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 11:26 am

Just for the record, for my part,
I 've never related to any domination angles by anyone in sex.
I 've never wanted to impose.
For sure, I 'd not tolerate domination being practiced against me !





David

0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  3  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 11:30 am
@Arella Mae,
There is NEVER a time when the victim can or should be blamed for being raped.
To blame the victim is innexcusable.

However, because there are so many false allegations of rape, it does tend to make true rape allegations suspect, in my opinion.
There are cases where the charge of rape has been used as a weapon by a woman to get something she wants.
And while it is true that those women are dealt with by the law, there is something we are all forgetting.

Where does the falsely accused person go to get their good reputations back?
Once a man is accused, thats all anyone remembers, not that the charge was proven false.
So either way, he loses.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 11:30 am

I 've always believed that victims of violent crime
shoud be well armed in their own defense.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 11:41 am
@mysteryman,
U look a lot like my friend, Donald, MM,
but I am almost 100% sure that u r not impersonating him
.


mysteryman wrote:
There is NEVER a time when the victim can or should be blamed for being raped.
To blame the victim is innexcusable.

However, because there are so many false allegations of rape, it does tend to make true rape allegations suspect, in my opinion.
There are cases where the charge of rape has been used as a weapon by a woman to get something she wants.
And while it is true that those women are dealt with by the law, there is something we are all forgetting.

Where does the falsely accused person go to get their good reputations back?
Once a man is accused, thats all anyone remembers, not that the charge was proven false.
So either way, he loses.
SO STIPULATED, MM.

I believe everything that u said.





David
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:08 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
I am not willing to give up erotic fun and exploration because some one some where is being violated through sexual transgression.


You are free to enjoy "erotic fun and exploration" as long as your partner is consenting. It becomes a sexual transgression when the partner is non consenting.

Since an underage partner cannot consent, the appropriate term to use is rape--statutory rape.

You also contradict yourself outrageously. Ostensibly you rail against rape laws you call "anti-sex" and "Puritan". But then, you talk about "loose women" and women who wear "slut clothes". So, you regard woman who actively enjoy and seek sexual relationships as "loose women"? And, if they wear clothing that reveals their physical attributes, you see them as in "slut clothing"? Seems to me, you're the Puritan. You're the one who wants women to hide their sexuality and their sexual desires. I guess you want women demurely dressed in public, and acting like inhibited virgins in the bedroom, because then that would justify your needs to dominate and control them--to make them "conquests".
No wonder you want the age of consent lowered--the younger and more unknowing they are, the more your fantasies of raping someone can be satisfied.

Grown women know when they do and don't want sexual intercourse. And most men have no difficulty understanding the legal meaning of "consent". Your problem is that you resent the fact that the woman can say, "No"--you feel that gives the woman too much power. You resent that the woman can call the shots in that regard. You are like the robber who resents property laws that prohibit theft. You want to be able to take whatever you want from another person, whether they are willing to give it or not. That's not the way a civilized society works. You can't take a person's property, or enter their body, without their consent--if you do such things, without consent, you are guilty of a crime. And, coercing her into giving you what you want, is being rather like the mugger who
coerces you into handing over your wallet.

It is not all that difficult for people to find consensual sex. But, consenting sex is not the topic of this thread.

We are talking about rape--non consensual sex.



NickFun
 
  3  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:09 pm
About 20 years ago I was working in an office and I went into the lunch room to put on my tie in the morning. A female coworker was sitting in there having coffee and she saw me putting on my tie.

"Nick!" she cried. "Why are you getting dressed in the break room?"

"Excuse me Sue? I'm just putting on my tie!"

"We'll see about that!" she stated.

About an hour later I was in the Presidents office as she had accused me of sexual harassment! I pleaded my case and was warned not to put my tie on in the break room!

It seemed odd that I was compliant if I was not wearing a tie and I was compliant if I was wearing a tie. But the act of putting on a tie almost made me a rapist!
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:20 pm
@mysteryman,
Quote:
However, and this is where I think Bill and others have an argument with you, in some cases the sex was consensual, and after the woman suffers "buyers remorse" about the person she had sex with, then it becomes a rape case.

You are saying that no matter what, its still rape.
Bill is saying, IMHO, that in that case it isnt rape, no matter what the woman says


No, I've never said that "buyers remorse" is the same as rape. If a woman has consensual sex, that she later regrets, I would not consider that rape.

You and Bill keep bringing up examples with very intoxicated women. In those instances, the woman might be too impaired to knowingly consent to sex, or might be so drunk she really doesn't remember what happened the next day and she thinks she didn't consent. The best policy, if one wants to avoid a rape charge, is to refrain from sex with extremely intoxicated women, unless you are in a long term relationship and know for certain that this sort of thing doesn't bother the woman.
0 Replies
 
spidergal
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:25 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
spidergal wrote:

I don't think the scenario you present can be used as a valid comparison to the drunken situation discussed above.

They're married. They're not strangers to each other. They presumably have sex on a regular basis.
It's different with the random people you get drunk with at the pub.

OmSigDAVID replied:

I 'm ASKING, not comparing.

In MY jurisdiction, NY, it used to be impossible for a husband to rape his own wife,
because that exception was explicitly written into the statute.
It was deleted.

Where does that leave hubby, the morning after the feast ??

(I remember a case wherein a fellow was accused of 100s,
maybe 1000s, of rapes over the years.)


I'm not in NYC, and I've no clue what you're talking about. Are you referring to husbands being charged of rape when they force their wives into having sex with them despite their (wives') refusal?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:30 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
We are talking about rape--non consensual sex.

YOU are talking about rape being non consensual sex, I am talking about how your definition of rape sucks and how we ought to change the definition back closer to what it used to be, the taking of an orifice by force. I am also highly critical of the state claiming the right to nullify consent after the fact.

While I believe that sex should be consensual, and I do believe that any couple who engage is sex where the consent becomes confused or where one party comes away feeling violated should get in front of a therapist, and should be compelled to do so by the law, I dont believe that consent problems alone should classify the act as rape. I believe that a force component should once again be made a prerequisite for a rape charge. I further believe that stat rape should be renamed, and that a lower AOC should be installed.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:34 pm
@spidergal,
Quote:
spidergal wrote:

I don't think the scenario you present can be used as a valid comparison to the drunken situation discussed above.

They're married. They're not strangers to each other. They presumably have sex on a regular basis.
It's different with the random people you get drunk with at the pub.

OmSigDAVID replied:

I 'm ASKING, not comparing.

In MY jurisdiction, NY, it used to be impossible for a husband to rape his own wife,
because that exception was explicitly written into the statute.
It was deleted.

Where does that leave hubby, the morning after the feast ??

(I remember a case wherein a fellow was accused of 100s,
maybe 1000s, of rapes over the years.)
spidergal wrote:

I'm not in NYC, and I've no clue what you're talking about. Are you referring to husbands being charged of rape when they force their wives into having sex with them despite their (wives') refusal?
If I remember, I was addressing bilaterally drunken sex of a married couple.

Ingestion of too much alcohol can cloud the memory.





David
0 Replies
 
spidergal
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:35 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
She often wants the male to take charge, to take her over her protest.


Again, prove this. Unless you prove it, it's just a factoid. You're not even a woman yourself - what makes you think so?

And even if this is true for a small percentage of women, I don't think those women want to be overpowered by some stranger against their absolute will.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:38 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
The only one who bears any responsibility for a rape is the person who commits the act
Under the old definition of rape where a woman was violated by force this was true. Under the new definition where many cases of rape are in fact cases where consent becomes confused, where the man believed that he had consent and can list good reasons why he thought that but the girl claims that she did do what he claims she did but still she did not want what happened.....in these cases the girl is very involved in the creation of what we are calling rape, by not making her desires known, or often because she did not know what she wanted, and sometimes because she changed her mind later but is not willing to take responsibility for her mind so she decides that she was raped. Because the rape feminists write sex law and they are not willing to admit the women are ever wrong/confused/lying we have a system that supports these females at great expense to males.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:39 pm
@spidergal,
Quote:
Again, prove this. Unless you prove it, it's just a factoid. You're not even a woman yourself - what makes you think so?

Start with romance novels, and then we can move on to science if you are not yet convinced.
spidergal
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:44 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Does that go for you to?

If you are the one not drinking in a heavy manner and he is do you placed your freedom at risk if he regret having sex with you the next day?

Should he be allow to place you in prison for twenty years and if not why does it only run one way in your opinion?


Thing is, if I'm aware the guy is too drunk to make a rational decision, I wouldn't have sex with him. He is not in the right mental state to decide whether he would really like to sleep with me, so I wouldn't bother.

It doesn't matter whether it's the man or the woman who is not too drunk - whoever it is, they've got to leave the other person alone.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:51 pm
@mysteryman,
Quote:
However, because there are so many false allegations of rape, it does tend to make true rape allegations suspect, in my opinion.


Even where the rapist confesses, or is convicted, or takes a plea deal? Rolling Eyes

There are false allegations with all crimes--and, with rape and other crimes, it's not just allegations made by victims, but false allegations by police and D.A.'s.

If the false allegation was deliberate, malicious, and unfounded, the person can bring a civil suit for damages against the party that harmed his reputation.

Anyone charged with a serious crime, and found "not guilty" faces the same problem. In some instances, evidence may not be sufficient to convict, but that doesn't mean the person is "innocent"--they just have not been found legally guilty. Did O.J. have his "good reputation" back after his criminal murder trial, even with a "not guilty" verdict? William Kennedy Smith was still regarded as a rapist by many in the public after his televised rape trial, even with a "not guilty" verdict, because the public heard about numerous other rape allegations against him that the jury wasn't allowed to hear.

In this thread, we have been talking about the crime of rape--actual rapes.
spidergal
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:54 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:

They're married. They're not strangers to each other. They presumably have sex on a regular basis. It's different with the random people you get drunk with at the pub.



BillRM replied:


Quote:
Who said anything about random people I myself had said you was out partying with someone assuming you knew this person at least somewhat.

Getting drunk in public without people you know with you is a bad idea for a man or a woman and something I was not picturing in my postings.

Talk about the need to tell sons not to rape telling daughters not to get drunk in public without at least protected friends around or not with someone in private who you do have reason to trust one hundred percent seem to be far more needed.


Okay, let's assume I "somewhat" know this person, but I'm not married to him. I'm in no way legally tied with him. I've not had sex with him ever.

The equation is different.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 12:56 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
In this thread, we have been talking about the crime of rape--actual rapes.
Royal "we".
0 Replies
 
spidergal
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2010 01:22 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
You missed my point. The long term effect of sleeping with the wrong men is sexual humiliation. T

Realization that I've only slept with nutcases will result in apparent humiliation and low self-esteem perhaps, but it will be nothing like the psychological trauma a woman has to endure because she was forced into sexual activity against her will.

Even though, in retrospect, I feel "like being raped", I'm aware I did choose to sleep with those men at that time. That sex was not against my will. It was not traumatic at that time. The immediate impact of that sex wasn't devastating for my psyche, even though now I feel a slow gush of humiliation.

Quote:

I said higher mammals, which not only means a frontal cortex but ones that have a similar frontal cortex to us.


Animal sex is just that - animal sex, the sole aim of which is to reproduce. Well, biologically speaking, that applies to humans as well, but for us sex is also tied to feelings and emotions. Sex is a special act for us- that's why people light scented candles and put on music, etc., while indulging in it. So you know what, you cannot compare.

Quote:
Of course they are allowed to feel good about rape...they survived a very dangerous situation and telling them how much we pity them is not the right attitude.


Actually, different women have different reactions to a traumatic experience like rape. Based on the temperament they are born with (are they stoic/tough?), the life experiences (upbringing, etc.), and the response of their immediate society to their rape, different women will display varying coping mechanisms. Some will overcome much of the hurt, while some will slip into depression, etc.

While women are allowed to feel good about rape (to put it in your words), most of them will naturally not feel good about it. Moreover, there is no evidence to prove that women will feel good about being raped if they'd fantasized about forceful sex/rape.

Sympathizing with victims of rape is not equivalent to pitying them - maybe that's how you see it. If these women are left to believe they had a part to play in that incident, their minds will lead them to a slow death thinking this was their fault.

Counseling and support can help mitigate the psychological repercussions of rape.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 02/13/2025 at 08:22:51