25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 03:09 pm
@panzade,
Quote:
I'm trying to imagine Firefly or any one saying:" Bill is not likely married to someone with a vagina."
This stuff is so pointless Bill. Can't you discuss without traipsing through the sewage?


If I had suggested that cutting out a vagina of a sleeping wife was a good idea to punish her for sexual misdeed or at the very least offer some support for that behavior, somehow there might had been even harsh words offer to me as a result.

However, the good old double standard seem alive and well on this board and society as a whole.
panzade
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 03:18 pm
@hawkeye10,
There's slander and then there's Bill saying Firefly's hubby is dick-less. I know you wouldn't say something like that hawkeye10. You're hanging with some real trash buddy.
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 03:34 pm
@panzade,
Well to made it even more clear after reading her postings I find it hard to believe that she have any males in her life that she care about.

Father, uncle, brothers, husband, sons you names it as otherwise it would be hard to understand her support for turning the whole society into a booby trap for straight men. She seem to view all males as threats and not as a parts of her family and friends.

No moral outrage at all for the filings of false charges of rapes by women either.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 04:34 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Well to made it even more clear after reading her postings I find it hard to believe that she have any males in her life that she care about.

Father, uncle, brothers, husband, sons you names it as otherwise it would be hard to understand her support for turning the whole society into a booby trap for straight men. She seem to view all males as threats and not as a parts of her family and friends.

No moral outrage at all for the filings of false charges of rapes by women either.

Firefly has not advocated for any such thing! You misread or misunderstood what she said. She said that because Loreena Bobbit pretty much got away with what she did many women believe she was in the right. Firefly never said it was right.

I think you and hawkeye are so focused on that tunnel vision of your protecting rapists it's clouded your comprehension.

I certainly have taken nothing she has said as advocating women being in the wrong. Check your statistics. I would bet, if I was a betting person that the amount of women falsely claiming rape to the ones that claim rape that are true is minimal. If a woman falsely accuses someone of rape you bet they need to be prosecuted just as men who rape women need to be prosecuted.
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 04:58 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:


If I had suggested that cutting out a vagina of a sleeping wife was a good idea to punish her for sexual misdeed or at the very least offer some support for that behavior, somehow there might had been even harsh words offer to me as a result.




Somehow, I think that would not have the same effect as what Lorena did.
http://ee-squad.com/forum/images/smilies/728_guillotine.gif
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 05:03 pm
I may be sorry for bringing this up but I can't help but wonder if some of you other posters have wondered what hawkeye and bill think about women like Pam Smart or Mary Kay Letourneau? Do you think they'd offer them the same leniency they want to offer to male rapists?
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 06:27 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
Do you think they'd offer them the same leniency they want to offer to male rapists
Why would you want hearsay/speculation when you have the opportunity to find out for yourself?
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 06:34 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
I think you and hawkeye are so focused on that tunnel vision of your protecting rapists it's clouded your comprehension
My focus is on promoting healthy and rewarding sexuality across the society tyvm. We have a twisted sexuality and we are not going to fix it with law and order. I also am highly opposed to the anti-sex crowd who thinks that the solution is to limit sex, and to take the joy out of sex and inject fear into sex as an aid to further limit sex. True that if no one is having sex then no one will get into sexual trouble, but sex is one of the great joys of life. The anti sex movement needs to be beat into the ground and soon, they have already done a lot of damage.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 06:36 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
Do you think they'd offer them the same leniency they want to offer to male rapists
Why would you want hearsay/speculation when you have the opportunity to find out for yourself?
I was asking others what they thought you might think based on what you have been posting.

So, okay, I'll ask you. What kind of punishment should they get?
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 06:38 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
I think you and hawkeye are so focused on that tunnel vision of your protecting rapists it's clouded your comprehension
My focus is on promoting healthy and rewarding sexuality across the society tyvm. We have a twisted sexuality and we are not going to fix it with law and order. I also am highly opposed to the anti-sex crowd who thinks that the solution is to limit sex, and to take the joy out of sex and inject fear into sex as an aid to further limit sex. True that if no one is having sex then no one will get into sexual trouble, but sex is one of the great joys of life. The anti sex movement needs to be beat into the ground and soon, they have already done a lot of damage.
Your focus has been on leniency for male rapists and you have been quite clear about it. You have also been quite clear that you feel women falsely accusing men of rape is an even greater crime. No one has been talking about taking the joy out of sex and injecting fear. Not that I have read anyway.

What antisex movement? You mean those that believe sex is meant for the sanctity of marriage?
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 06:47 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
So, okay, I'll ask you. What kind of punishment should they get?
I support equality, so it should go the same either way. The basic principles do not change, teens should be allowed more sexual freedom than they are, sexual problems should not be put into the criminal justice system except for rape-rape, making certain child porn and sex with an under aged person (about 15 YO would be about right), sex offender lists should be unconstitutional, holding people beyond their terms should be unconstitutional....

Teachers should not be having sex with their students, or any student...that should not be a criminal offense but it should get them thrown out of the profession.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 06:59 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
So, okay, I'll ask you. What kind of punishment should they get?
I support equality, so it should go the same either way. The basic principles do not change, teens should be allowed more sexual freedom than they are, sexual problems should not be put into the criminal justice system except for rape-rape, making certain child porn and sex with an under aged person (about 15 YO would be about right), sex offender lists should be unconstitutional, holding people beyond their terms should be unconstitutional....

Teachers should not be having sex with their students, or any student...that should not be a criminal offense but it should get them thrown out of the profession.
I do not understand people that think like you. You call evil good and good evil. Rape is rape. A child is a child. Lord have mercy on you.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 07:02 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
What antisex movement? You mean those that believe sex is meant for the sanctity of marriage?
The anti sex movement is a collection of all those who take an opposite approach from the free love movement. It is all those who actively discourage sexual activity, along with all those who attempt to put barbed wire around sex by fear mongering about how dangerous it is, either medically, emotionally, or criminally. It also includes those who are constantly pushing to make more and more sex illegal in the attempt to stop it from happening.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 07:07 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
otherwise it would be hard to understand her support for turning the whole society into a booby trap for straight men.


Laws against rape, and sexual assaults of females are not "turning the whole society into a booby trap for straight men". That's absurd. We need laws against such crimes. And I believe that you and Hawkeye have been the only people in this thread objecting to the current laws.

For several pages of this thread you have been grousing about your inability to know whether or not a woman has given you consent to have sex with her, and whether you will be accused of rape if you have sex with an intoxicated woman.

The rape laws are not that difficult to understand. Most men understand them. They are not a "booby trap". If there is any doubt in your mind whether or not she has given consent, or whether she is able to give consent, don't have sex with her. You don't always have to have sex. When in doubt, don't. If you continue to be troubled by your confusion about the rape laws, make an appointment with someone in your local District Attorney's office, and have them explain the laws to you. I am sure that someone would be willing to do that.

I have expressed my feelings about women who make false rape accusations--repeatedly. And so has everyone else. Because you are obsessed with this issue does not mean that everyone wishes to remain focused on it. If you have objections to the types of sentences given to women for this sort of crime, contact your state legislators and voice your outrage to them. They are the ones in a position to do something about it. No one in this thread can do anything about sentencing guidelines. And everyone in this thread has agreed that making false allegations is abhorrent behavior.

You are extremely mistrustful of women. It seems to be all women that you see as liable to vindictively, or frivolously, try to hurt you by accusing you of something you did not do. You mentioned that your ex-wife did falsely accuse you of assaulting her, so some of your mistrust might be understandable. But all women are not like that. All women do not do such things. Perhaps it would be helpful for you to see a therapist and work through some of your feelings about women. These are personal issues for you, which are not going to get resolved in this thread. Women, like men, are not inherently untrustworthy, but you see them that way. There is no vast conspiracy on the part of women to ensnare men in the "booby trap" of rape laws. If you genuinely feel that way, you should consult a therapist for your own well being. It is difficult to have intimate relationships with people you don't trust.



ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 07:12 pm
@Intrepid,
I've stopped with this thread, all I see is hawkeye, ad infinitum; oh, and oh bill.

Women who could possibly want to talk about the actual thread post are shut down, because the same olds will post to infinity about being misjudged.

Can you imagine posting on this thread if this was a serious problem in your own life, even one of years past. No, it's an overridden thread, by thread blasters.
I'm old enough that I can take it, but the whole turn to Men Falsely Accused is a giant discount, yet again. Blowhardianism.

0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 07:19 pm
@BillRM,
You pig.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 07:33 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
It is difficult to have intimate relationships with people you don't trust.

open your eyes, trust and justification for trust is in extremely limited supply in the modern world. The financial system stopped working because of lack of trust, we trusted BP to operate a safe drilling operation and look at the result. I hope for your sake that you have a better argument. Nice little trick making it Bills personal problem though claiming that not trusting makes him inferior.

There is zero reason to trust that women who have the ability to do injustice to men will not use that injustice for gain. It is all besides the point anyways, because a legal system that is systemically unjust requires reform, regardless of how much that flaw have been exploited to date.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 09:10 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:

I would love to know if firefly is married or not and if so the poor guy email so I could send this posting to him of his wife defending some sick nut claiming mistreatment/rape in the married bed as justification to cut off his penis when he was sleeping.

Somehow I do not think she is married however or at least not likley married to someone with a penis.


These personal remarks, and your others about me in a similar vein, are very degrading, insulting, and offensive. You genuinely have no respect for women.

And you had the gall to make this totally unjustified comment to Intrepid

Quote:
You do have contempt for all of womankind.


Take a look in the mirror, buddy, you are talking about yourself.

Do you have any idea why I even posted the article about Lorena Bobbit along with the comments I made about it? Did you read the sequence of remarks, particularly by Hawkeye, that were made prior to that post?

Hawkeye revealed his understanding of the responsibility in a rape situation to be on this level:
Quote:
and SOME WOMEN need to take responsibility and keep their legs closed!

He essentially blamed the victim for her own rape.

Hawkeye then went on to say:
Quote:
I know the knee jerk reaction is to blame the man, but this is 2010...We reached equality some time ago, and with equality women gain responsibilities,which they tend to want to avoid by blaming men when something goes wrong

When something goes wrong? That's his view of a rape. Something "went wrong" so the woman blames the man.

He's not only blaming the victim, he's denying the nature of a rape.

Hawkeye then said
Quote:
And women have no responsibility to report or help the state prosecute rapists, their main responsibility to to themselves at that point, they are the injured party


Oh, first he says that women should take responsibility for the rape, and now he wouldn't even urge women to report the rape...that their main responsibility is to themselves.

Well, I suddenly remembered Lorena Bobbit, and the whole issue of spousal rape and domestic abuse. Which is why I said:

Quote:
Hawkeye, men like you convince women that Lorena Bobbit had the right idea. She skipped reporting the facts of her abuse and rape to the police and simply took matters into her own hands...literally.


I posted the facts of the Bobbit case and said
Quote:
Now there's a woman who overcame her victimization at the hands of a man


Lorena Bobbit was a battered wife who found her rape that night, by her drunken husband, so intolerable that she finally snapped. One can only imagine how much abuse and rape she had endured before that night that caused her to become unhinged and take the action she did. But it was the final rape that did it to her. And she attacked the "weapon" used to rape her. And, in a rape, a penis does become a weapon.

Did I "defend" Lorena's actions? Of course not. But I could certainly understand the enormous build up of despair and rage and feelings of helplessness that must have driven her over the edge of reason that night. This woman had been badly abused by her husband, physically and sexually, and she felt she just had to end her victimization that night.

Not only could most women understand why Lorena became unhinged, I think most men could also. And the jury did too. Anyone with the capacity for empathy could.

BillRM, from this you conclude that I am some sort of man-hater? Because I brought up her case? Because I can empathize with her suffering? I brought up her case in this thread because I wanted to make a point about rape and what that kind of abuse and humiliation can do to a woman.

Do you have any conception, at all, of what rape is like for the victim?

Quote:
The Bobbitt case was one of the first unique scandals that brought public attention to the subject of marital rape. The case also brought attention to the issue of domestic violence. Within days of the incident, domestic violence and feminist groups rallied around Lorena, citing the continuous abuse she suffered at the hands of her husband that caused her to defend herself, albeit in an unusual and violent manner
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_and_Lorena_Bobbitt


Indirectly, the notoriety of the case did benefit other women. It did draw public attention to the problem of marital rape. The lack of public attention, prior to that time, might have accounted for why Lorena did not know how to deal with her situation in a better manner before she got to the breaking point.

So, rather than making insulting remarks about me, or anyone else, why don't you try to put some effort into trying to understand what is being said here.








hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 09:29 pm
@firefly,
where you under the impression that my post needed an interpreter? I meant what I said, not what you spun my words to mean. I can speak for myself.....you are a fine one to be taking about not being respected considering that you routinely practice lack of respect towards your fellow a2k members when they don't agree with you, will not allow you to bully them.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 10:05 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
sex offender lists should be unconstitutional, holding people beyond their terms should be unconstitutional....


These are reasonable ideas that should get some discussion. Has the constitutionality ever been tested?

The community doesn't get prior warning of organized crime members' releases. They aren't on a national "mafia" list though it's pretty much a forgone conclusion that they will re-offend.

And think how much better it would be to have their faces splashed all over the place. It would make it much more difficult for them to commit their crimes, to run their crime paid for businesses, boycotts would become much easier.

They are capable of the most heinous of crimes, they are an incredible drag on the economy, yet they are allowed to go on making a living by taking things from society, from honest people.

Why not them too?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/20/2024 at 01:48:45