25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 07:07 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Yes we should cause elderly women to be as fearful as possible of rare events as that will surely be a benefit to them.


if the elderly are concerned, or their kids, the solution is well known.....dont let mom go to the old folks home, let her move in with the kids.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 07:09 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Such websites in the past have not proven to be good sources of reliable statistics to say the least in any area of sexual assaults
Ya, but we usually know which way they skew...it is the worst case proposition, and I was showing that the worst case is no where near as bad as the advertised so far as prevalence of rape in America goes.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  2  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 07:19 pm
@firefly,
I am not reading anything they post. They aren't going to change, firefly.
BillRM
 
  -4  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 07:24 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
I am not reading anything they post. They aren't going to change, firefly.


We are not going to join you in never never land or in a program to frighten elderly women concerning a very low risk event for them.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 09:15 pm
It has taken eight long years for this case to come to trial. I pray Elizabeth can handle all this publicity. Hopefully, she has had eight years of healing and will be okay.

Quote:
Alleged mastermind behind Elizabeth Smart kidnapping to stand trial
By Ashley Hayes, CNNOctober 31, 2010 4:42 p.m. EDT

(CNN) -- More than eight years after a Utah teenager disappeared from her bedroom on a summer night, the man authorities believe masterminded her kidnapping is set to stand trial in federal court.

Brian David Mitchell, 57, is accused of snatching then-14-year-old Elizabeth Smart at knifepoint from her family's Salt Lake City home on June 5, 2002 -- a crime that shocked the nation and the city, which was then basking in the glow of the 2002 Olympic Winter Games a few months earlier.

Mitchell faces federal charges of kidnapping and transporting a minor across state lines for improper purposes. Jury selection in his trial is scheduled to begin Monday in Salt Lake City.

In the months that followed Smart's disappearance, her anguished parents, Ed and Lois, became a familiar sight in the media as they continued to plead for their daughter's safe return.

But no one expected what happened in March 2003, when Smart was found walking down a street in the Salt Lake City suburb of Sandy in the company of Mitchell and his wife, Wanda Eileen Barzee. Mitchell, a drifter and self-described prophet who called himself "Emmanuel," had done some handyman work at the Smarts' home.

Utah prosecutors charged Mitchell with six felony charges of kidnapping, sexual assault and burglary. But in July 2005, a Utah district court judge ruled him incompetent to stand trial, leaving him in custody at the Utah State Hospital.

However, the state case against Mitchell was put on hold when federal authorities stepped in. A grand jury in 2008 indicted Mitchell and Barzee. U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball found Mitchell competent to stand trial in March.

Barzee, 64, pleaded guilty in November 2009 to kidnapping and unlawful transportation of a minor in federal court and was sentenced in May to 15 years in federal prison. She also pleaded guilty but mentally ill in state court to conspiracy to commit aggravated kidnapping in an attempt to kidnap Smart's cousin a month after Smart was kidnapped. She was given a sentence of one to 15 years, to be served concurrently with the federal sentence, and given credit for the seven years she had spent in custody.

As part of her plea agreement, Barzee agreed to cooperate in the state and federal cases against her husband. However, her name does not appear on a witness list filed by federal prosecutors -- and does appear on a list of witnesses filed by the defense.

Smart, her mother and her younger sister, Mary Katherine -- who was sleeping in the room with Smart the night of the kidnapping and was the only witness -- all appear on the prosecution's witness list.

Mitchell's attorneys attempted to move his trial, saying it should be held outside of Utah because publicity in the case had prejudiced the pool of potential jurors against him and jeopardized his right to a fair trial.

Kimball denied that request in August, and defense attorneys appealed his ruling to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, Colorado. A three-judge panel on the appeals court denied the request last week, saying it was premature since jury selection had not taken place.

"It is possible that a jury could be seated where all the jurors would satisfy Mr. Mitchell's view of impartiality," the 10th Circuit ruling said.

Defense attorneys in July said in court documents that they intend to utilize an insanity defense and intend to introduce expert testimony relating to an alleged mental disease or defect.

Now 22, Smart testified as part of Mitchell's competency hearing last year that after taking her -- still dressed in her red pajamas -- from her home, Mitchell took her to a wooded area behind her home and performed a mock marriage ceremony with her before sexually assaulting her. She testified he repeatedly assaulted her during her months in captivity, and that he and Barzee took her to California before returning with her to Utah.

The federal court summoned 600 jurors to fill out a preliminary juror questionnaire in the case, according to court documents. About 500 potential jurors attended the sessions on September 30 and October 1. Some were released on hardship grounds, the documents said, but about 330 jurors completed the questionnaire.

Kimball narrowed that number down to slightly more than 200 potential jurors, according to The Salt Lake Tribune newspaper.


OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:41 am
@Arella Mae,
I wish that on the nite of the kidnapping,
Elizabeth had grabbed up a large caliber revolver and shot him some place important.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 03:18 am
@firefly,
firefly wrote:
David, I'm not sure that arming elderly women--
women in their 70's, 80's and 90's--who may have diminished reaction times,
impaired eyesight and hearing, and problems with motor coordination
or eye-hand coordination, not to mention cognitive problems--is a very realistic idea,
Maybe; each case must be decided on its own individual merits.
When my uncle died, his widow asked me to help her
get a handgun for defensive purposes.

About 50 years ago, I made a point of giving my mother a .30 caliber M-1 Carbine,
loaded with a 30 round magazine of alternating copper (military)
and the more destructive soft point ammunition.
Of course, M-1 Carbines are semi-automatic.

We knew that if a burglar were to approach her,
he 'd have to use some stairs and he 'd then be exposed to defensive gunfire.
(Nothing untoward ever happened.)
Being a shoulder weapon, the weight (wate) of the Carbine
woud absorb a lot of the .30 caliber recoil, which is not much.
As my mother used to say: "its better to be safe than sorry."






firefly wrote:
particularly if these women have not used a gun before.
But I get your point.
THAT issue is managable n controlable,
to wit: take her shooting.

Find a good gunnery range n blast away. Its fun.







firefly wrote:
The best way to make women rape-proof is to stop people from raping.
HOW? Was there ever a time in human history that it did not happen?
Humans (humen?) are animalistic. We r spiritual beings seated upon an animal base.
Is it possible to alter human nature? I don 't believe that there is any evidence that humen
can be stopped from stealing, murdering, arsoning or raping.

I have dated some very beautiful girls, and I assure u
that for no fraction of a nanosecond did I desire to commit that crime
(or any other crime) on any of them, but I 'm aware, from reading
the newspapers, that this state-of-mind is not universally prevalent.
The same way that we always had the common cold, we also had perverts.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 03:52 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
First if is a revolver as I do not trust any automatic not to jam
at the worst possible moment even the colt model 1911A 45.
AGREED, for sure.
Jamming at the rong time can be very embarrassing.




BillRM wrote:
It is loaded with hollow-point rounds
That is sound judgment: take no chances.
The hollowpointed slugs will tend to put the brakes on
to render a fuller energy dump into the target,
rather than over-penetrate and carry that energy away into America.






BillRM wrote:
and she is a very good shot with a very cool manner in any emergency situation.
Advise her to aim for the large intestine; THAT 'll slow them down.
Criminals don 't like to be shot there.






BillRM wrote:
I myself prefer my Smith and Western model 19 357
but her 38 should deal with the most likely home situations.
Have u tried a .44 special ??
My favor goes to the .44 TAurus Model 445 in 2 inch (ported) stainless steel mirror.
(The bright mirror [brighter and more reflective than the picture shows]
is especially good for in terrorem deflection
of bad guys at nite. I 've had some experience with that.)
http://www.proguns.com/images/used-guns/usedguns247-904/278taurus445.jpg
I 've gotta have a lot of respect
for the additional STOPPING POWER of the extra bulk; it gives u better energy-dump into the target.
The .44 has additional good functional stopping power.
Remember what happened in the Philippine Insurrection (1899–1902).

Your life may depend on it; and remember to practice, practice, practice.

FIREFLY: Fear not that I will hi-jack your thread.
I 'll stop discussing guns as soon as u say so.





David
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 08:06 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

I wish that on the nite of the kidnapping,
Elizabeth had grabbed up a large caliber revolver and shot him some place important.





David
The thing about that is, how would that have affected her? It's the proverbial "between a rock and a hard place" situation. Crime, no matter what the type, has a long-reaching arm, doesn't it? I'm keeping her in my prayers. She has been strong so far and I'm praying she stays that way.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 09:32 am
@Arella Mae,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

I wish that on the nite of the kidnapping,
Elizabeth had grabbed up a large caliber revolver and shot him some place important.





David
Arella Mae wrote:
The thing about that is, how would that have affected her? It's the proverbial "between a rock and a hard place" situation. Crime, no matter what the type, has a long-reaching arm, doesn't it? I'm keeping her in my prayers. She has been strong so far and I'm praying she stays that way.
It is uncertain how that 'd have affected her.
If 2 men lay out in the sun, 1 may get a sunburn while the other tans.
However, it may not be wise to permit yourself to be taken into
the unlimited discretion of a violent felon; witness the case of Polly Klaas, age 12,
as I remember. Richard Davis was released from prison in California.
Within a few hours, he broke into a sleepover get together of girls
of that age (apparently ALL of whom were unarmed [not always a good idea]).
Davis threatened them with a knife.
Apparently, no one resisted; no one fled.
He tied all of them up, then kidnapped, raped and murdered Polly.

In MY opinion, it woud have been a much nicer ending if one (or more) of the girls
brought out .45 caliber revolvers and installed a few holes
into his large intestine.

It was only blind luck n idle chance
that Elizabeth Smart did not end up as bad as Polly.

In a predatory emergency,
the victim desperately NEEDS
to control the situation, as well as possible.
Every predatory event is a contest of power.
The proper equipment enables u to bring that power to bear.



Admittedly,
your objection has possible merit.
For instance, there was a case of a NYC Police Officer
who responded to a call concerning a violent situation
and found a large woman brandishing a gardening tool
of some kind (maybe a pitchfork?) She charged him with it,
after he demanded that she drop it. He shot her; she perished.
(NY is safer now.)
The police officer took it to heart. He took time off.
He got psychological or psychiatic help.
He grew progressively more despondent, ending in suicide.
That proves that u r right, Arella.

In my opinion, fighting back is better (sometimes).

I think its better to kill the predator,
than the other way around.





David
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 09:42 am
You know Hawkeye it is sad and amusing that at the very moment that reported rapes/sexual assaults is at a thirty years low is the time that we also have people like Firefly running madly around trying to convict us otherwise.

All women from the very young to the very old should live constantly in fear of the men around them.

Crazy pumps up numbers with no foundation in facts and with an attempt to redefine rape so broadly that a large percent of the normal interactions between consenting men and women should be label rape for the first time in human history are the tools of the Fireflies of the world.

The major news outlets repeats this nonsense of pumps up numbers over and over with zero facts checking.

Robert Heinlein calls such a period the crazy years for good reason.

firefly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 10:20 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
FIREFLY: Fear not that I will hi-jack your thread.
I 'll stop discussing guns as soon as u say so.


Thank you, David. Enough with the guns.

I do not disagree with the idea of women protecting themselves, it's a reasonable idea. Perhaps you should start another thread to discuss the best methods of self defense, it's really a separate topic. You've mentioned guns, BillRM mentioned pepper spray, other people advise learning martial arts--there are many things that might be helpful--but please talk about them in another thread so that this one can maintain a focus on the crime of rape.

As for Elizabeth Smart, I don't really think it is appropriate to supply children with guns. And her younger sister was in the bedroom with her when she was abducted, and that child also should not have been around a loaded gun. Maybe a burglar alarm, or a better burglar alarm system, might have helped in that situation.

OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 10:25 am
@firefly,
I can 't think of anything to add, at the moment.

I 'll start another thread, if I do.





David
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 10:38 am
@Arella Mae,
I'm sure that Elizabeth can handle the publicity at this point. She appears to be a very poised young woman from what I've seen in interviews. And she has already testified about her horrible ordeal.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20309630,00.html

I think she has very remarkable parents. The way they dealt with her abduction, and the sensitivity and understanding they showed toward her after her return, and their continued involvement with the problem of child abduction, suggests that they are very strong and caring people. I am sure that the support of her family has been a major factor in helping her recovery.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 11:14 am
Survivors of sexual abuse at the hands of priests are still demanding a response from the Vatican.

Quote:
British woman 'was raped by priest'
(UKPA) – 7 hours ago
November 1, 2010

A British woman spoke out about her rape ordeal at the hands of a priest, during a protest by clergy sex abuse victims near the Vatican.

Sue Cox, 63, from Warwickshire, was among around 100 survivors from a dozen countries, including Italy, the US, Ireland, the Netherlands and Australia, at Sunday's candlelit protest.

Italian paramilitary police blocked a boulevard leading to the Vatican to prevent marchers reaching St Peter's Square, but later allowed two protesters to leave letters from victims at the Holy See's doorstep.

The two also left a dozen stones near the obelisk in St Peter's square to mark a symbolic path so other survivors might know they had company in their suffering.

At a briefing before the march, Ms Cox was among participants who stood up one by one to tell how their lives had been destroyed by the abuse they suffered as children.

"For 50 years I thought I was the only person in the entire world that had been abused by a Catholic priest," she said. Ms Cox clarified herself "raped by a Catholic priest, not abused, because what he did was rape me and rape is different".

"It's taken 50 years for me to find my voice. But now I've found it, I want to continue to speak on behalf of people who maybe aren't able to speak or have not yet been able to face the fear and the guilt and shame that survivors feel."

The candlelit protest was the first significant demonstration in the shadow of the Vatican by people who had been raped and molested by priests as children. Organisers said it would be repeated until the Holy See took decisive action to ensure children were safe.

"Today what began as quiet whispers are whispers no more," organiser Gary Bergeron told the crowd, which included around 55 Italians from a notorious Catholic institute for the deaf in Verona where dozens of students said they were raped by priests.

Despite Vatican spokesman the Rev Federico Lombardi being unable to greet the organisers at the protest, Mr Bergeron met Mr Lombardi later inside his Vatican office and told him that abuse survivors had been "waiting a lifetime to be able to stand up and speak out".
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5i-_FI6qtAf9hSYu54HKr3oTPnjsw?docId=N0086791288593363300A


0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:02 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
You know Hawkeye it is sad and amusing that at the very moment that reported rapes/sexual assaults is at a thirty years low is the time that we also have people like Firefly running madly around trying to convict us otherwise.

using the old definitions this is true, a problem that the rape feminists are wanting to fix by getting the government to use the modern greatly expanded definitions and thus bumping up the numbers.

The fact that sexual aggression leading to violation has become much less of a problem over the last decades does warrant some investigation. Are we looking at the law and order approach working, or are we rather looking at a people who are naturally more sedate and law abiding than our ancestors were?? Keeping mind that crime is down across the board, so far as I know the decrease in sex crime is not unusual, it is in line with the magnitude of overall crime decrease.

However, we are not even close to being ready to have this conversation, as the rape feminists are still successfully selling their self promoting rape scare.
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:19 pm
@hawkeye10,
Hawkeye all crimes are dropping and beside longer sentences and locking up at any given time two percents of our total male population the most of any major country by far, the population is also aging out of the prime crime ages.

We had far less ratio of teenagers to thirty something to the overall population then in the recent decades.

One do wonder if Firefly get her way what percent of our total male population would end up behind bars.

Double to four percents or more perhaps.
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:33 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Hawkeye all crimes are dropping and beside longer sentences and locking up at any given time two percents of our total male population the most of any major country by far, the population is also aging out of the prime crime ages.

The reason we have seen crime rates drop so much is in much dispute. I would much rather be talking about why sex crime rates are so low by recent historical standards then I am by this forced diversion into fantasy land where so many think that women are being constantly raped, and where every guy is first and foremost a potential rapist. I understand that fear works to warp reality, I have to compliment the rape feminists on their successful manipulation program, but wallowing in delusion does get old.
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:54 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
I have to compliment the rape feminists on their successful manipulation program, but wallowing in delusion does get old.


I am not so understanding as they <feminists> are doing their very best to break the trust that normally exist between men and women to the great harm of both sexes.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 04:09 pm
@Arella Mae,
Arella Mae wrote:
I am not reading anything they post. They aren't going to change, firefly.
Without commenting on the 2 men in question, Arella,
may I point out that the Ignore feature serves the purpose
that u indicated very well ?

There r several denizens of A2K for whose minds
I lost respect; (i.e., I did not care what thay thought about anything).
I have them on Ignore; some have been gone for several years, so far.
(Most were chronically guilty of persistently angry obscenity.)

U might find it convenient.





David
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 02/07/2025 at 09:21:41