25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 05:32 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Arella Mae wrote:
I am not reading anything they post. They aren't going to change, firefly.
Without commenting on the 2 men in question, Arella,
may I point out that the Ignore feature serves the purpose
that u indicated very well ?

There r several denizens of A2K for whose minds
I lost respect; (i.e., I did not care what thay thought about anything).
I have them on Ignore; some have been gone for several years, so far.
(Most were chronically guilty of persistently angry obscenity.)

U might find it convenient.





David
I choose to vote them down and then voila! They disappear.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 05:45 pm
@firefly,
I am sure you are right about Elizabeth. She does have strong family support. I am going to pray for them all because it sure can't hurt!
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 06:02 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
I choose to vote them down and then voila! They disappear.


Of course you wished to block others from reading our posts not just yourself.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 06:33 pm
@firefly,
Please take note the Canadian gang rape story at the Rave party had disappear with only the one 18 year olds who took the video and released same on Youtube facing child porn charges.

This silent in spite of two female witnesses that the police had stated had come forward and the video.
.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 08:11 am
Teaching high school males to act respectfully toward females, and to intervene if they see girls being sexually assaulted, seem like positive steps in helping to prevent rapes.

Quote:

Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Richmond High Gets Lesson in Masculinity

In anti-rape crusade, an effort to teach young men positive strength
By: Julia Landau,
Richmond Confidential

It was a year ago yesterday that police say seven men beat and raped a 16-year-old Richmond High School girl for more than two hours before anyone called 911. The victim had just left the school’s Homecoming Dance. Several people reportedly witnessed the crime and took no action to stop it; how many bystanders were there is disputed.

In the days immediately following the crime, rape prevention instructor Rhonda James excoriated the school district for denying her request to teach workshops at the high school. James directs Community Violence Solutions, a nonprofit that offers what’s called “bystander training” in how to intervene to stop a rape. School officials subsequently allowed James’ program into the school.

Community Violence Solutions began holding the workshops at Richmond High last year in the wake of the high-profile case.

News outlets swarmed the school. Many Richmond High students felt the media attention created a distorted label for students, their school, and Richmond overall.

“They even mentioned the school in “Law and Order.” They used it as an example,” said Andy Sanchez, a senior at Richmond High.

James says media attention casting Richmond as a particularly violent place made her work with students a little tougher.

“They say, ‘How dare the world see us as animals?’” says James, “And they’re so focused on that that there isn’t room for compassion.” Instead of talking about what happened and why, she said, people wanted to distance themselves from the crime.

But James said it’s important to shift the focus from blaming the city, to examining the social psychology at work when young men gather.

Community Violence Solutions’ training, called My Strength, was developed by the California Coalition Against Sexual Assault. It recruits young men to analyze the language and images used to represent masculinity. Physical strength—its benefits and abuses—is the focal metaphor. T-shirts emblazoned with “My strength is not for hurting” are given out in the hope that the message will catch on.

“We discuss terms like ‘fronting’ and ‘manning up,’” says training director Jack Schmidt. “And we talk about the consequences of violence. Like jail time.”

The key, James said, is offering a different view of positive masculinity. “There’s not some secret boys school where you learn to be bad to women,” James said. “It happens because of uninterrupted messages rather than something that’s being taught to them.”

James said her her experience and research show that when one person voices his moral instinct it sways others to do the same.

“There is a tendency to agree with the group until a voice of dissension pipes up, breaking the stupor,” said James. “Most of this change happens one-to-one. “I’m not talking about going out and prosthelytizing. I’m talking about saying, ‘Dude, that’s not cool.’ That’s really all it takes sometimes.”

James thinks it’s important to make the distinction between those people who stood by without stopping the incident and those who actively participated.

The witnesses who failed to intervene in the crime were not sociopaths, James suggested. “As human beings it’s hard to move outside of what appears to be the norm,” she said, even if it happens suddenly and is violent. “And the longer you wait the less likely it is that you are going to intervene.”

Community Violence Solutions has an agreement with De Anza and Richmond High to hold workshops this year. James hopes discussions about gender and violence become a fixture in school curriculums.

“It’s not effective to sprinkle schools with information,” she says. “We’re starting earlier and focusing more on boys.”

James says the seeds of prevention can be planted early.

“Before you find yourself in that situation,” she says, “you will already have made the decision” to speak up.
http://www.baycitizen.org/crime/story/richmond-high-gets-lesson-masculinity/print/
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 08:34 am
Both of these current news stories are about rapes done by registered sex offenders.


Rape knows no age limits...whether the victim is 94 or 2 years old it is still the same heinous crime against a female.
Quote:
Police: Victim In Rape, Child Porn Case Is 2 Years Old
By Shawn Neisteadt
November 1, 2010, 5:52 PM

SIOUX FALLS, SD - Sioux Falls police arrested a registered sex offender, 43-year-old Sandor Czekus, Sunday afternoon and he now faces a list of new sex charges. That includes first-degree rape, having and manufacturing child pornography and having sexual contact with a child younger than 16.

Police say the victim in this case is just two years old.

But this isn't the first time he's been in trouble with the law. Czekus was found guilty of sodomizing a 16-year-old girl in 2002 in Missouri. He moved to Sioux Falls four years later and is now facing more serious charges.

The Sioux Falls Police Department says Czekus took pictures of a naked two-year-old child and also digitally penetrated that child. Czekus was arrested after the child's mother found images on his external hard drive, then brought that device to police, who then obtained a search warrant.

"Detectives just did an initial preview on that external hard drive and confirmed there was child pornography, that these images were of this two-year-old girl on there," Officer Sam Clemens said.

Officers have also searched his home, where prosecutors said in court Monday afternoon that police have seized his computers.

"We have to remember that people commit these crimes, and as horrible as they are, they happen time and time again. We do what we can to try and prevent that and try to find the people that are responsible for this," Clemens said.

In an initial appearance in court, prosecutors called Czekus “a very, very dangerous man who can't control his urges.” Now, the police department says highly trained detectives will search for all evidence they can and are glad the mother acted quickly when she found the images.

"The sooner a report is made to the police department, the better it is. If you see images and you wait a period of time, if you wait a month or two months, those images may be gone," Clemens said.

While the judge was setting bond for Czekus at $25,000 cash only, another jailhouse inmate awaiting his hearing erupted and shouted at Czekus over the nature of his charges. That prompted Czekus to ask for protection in jail.

Czekus faces up to 40 years in prison if found guilty.
http://www.keloland.com/News/NewsDetail6371.cfm?Id=106611


The mentally disabled are at higher risk for being raped because of their greater vulnerability.

Quote:
Sex offender accused of rape
November 2, 2010

A 44-year-old registered sexual offender was arrested Friday morning in the rape of a mentally retarded 17-year-old, police said.

Police said Vincent Hunter, of the 1800 block of 18th Street Court East, sexually assaulted the girl four times and molested her on other occasions. The girl has a mental age of 8 due to developmental disabilities, according to an arrest report.

Hunter was previously convicted of raping a 16-year-old in Texas

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20101102/ARTICLE/101109974/2055/NEWS?Title=Sex-offender-accused-of-rape




0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 08:56 am
Even though law enforcement and Facebook try to be vigilant, a registered sex offender might still be found on Facebook. This one is a convicted rapist who served 12 years in prison.
Quote:
Convicted rapist active on Facebook
Eric Mansfield
11/2/2010

CUYAHOGA FALLS -- Rick Sikula isn't where he is supposed to be, even without leaving his home. As a convicted rapist and sex offender, he's not supposed to be on Facebook.

A Channel 3 News viewer knew of Sikula's 1987 convictions for rape and kidnapping, for which he served 12 years in prison.

She became concerned when she saw Sikula sending virtual roses to women on Facebook. She feared that those women didn't know that Sikula is listed as an habitual sex offender.

Facebook's policies prohibit sex offenders from having profiles, and local law enforcement monitor offenders' activities on-line.

"We have our sex offender unit, which is very vigilant in their duties and Facebook, and they work very well with law enforcement," said Inspector Bill Holland, of the Summit County Sheriff's Office.

Court records show Sikula was also convicted of a felony for failing to register his address as a sex offender in 2006. He received two years community control in lieu of one year in jail.
http://www.wkyc.com/news/local/news_article.aspx?storyid=156263&catid=3

BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 10:22 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Rick Sikula isn't where he is supposed to be, even without leaving his home. As a convicted rapist and sex offender, he's not supposed to be on Facebook.


A few comments first unless the man is under some court order or legal restriction all he did was to violently a website/facebook policy the penal is just to be removed under that name.

He could cheerfully sign back in under a slightly differ name if he would care to do so.

Second, there are a lot of men and women who share a sexual predator name so a simple filter comparing names to some sexual predators master list is going to be hitting on far more innocent men and women then predators.

The whole facebook policy is just a feel good policy with little commonsense to it.

Facebook is like any other parts of the world real or online world you are going to be meeting all kinds of people and commonsense would be to check them out yourself before getting involved.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 10:47 am
@firefly,
Well a few states had pass such laws how interesting.........

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://news.cnet.com/8301-19518_3-10309421-238.html


Social-networking ban for sex offenders: Bad call?
by Larry Magid Font size Print E-mail Share 29 comments Yahoo! BuzzThe just-signed Illinois law banning sex offenders from social-networking sites might seem like a good idea to protect children, but it will have virtually no impact on their safety and could wind up making things worse.

The law, which was signed Thursday by Illinois Governor Pat Quinn, would prevent registered sex offenders in Illinois from using a social-networking service defined as an "Internet Web site containing profile Web pages...that include the names or nicknames of such members, photographs...or any other personal or personally identifying information."

The definition also includes "the ability to leave messages or comments on the profile Web page that are visible to all or some visitors to the profile Web page," which might be interpreted to include news sites, including CNET News, that allow visitors to register and leave comments.

But let's start with the problem the law is trying to solve. It's aimed at adults who troll the Web in search of children to sexually exploit. While such people do exist, they are rarely successful in harming youth whom they meet through the Internet. Every peer-reviewed study conducted by the Crimes Against Children Research Center and other scholarly organizations, as well as the report of Internet Safety Technical Task Force, has concluded that the risk of online predators is greatly exaggerated.

I'm not aware of any cases of a predator harming a prepubescent child whom he met on the Internet, and there are very few publicly known cases of sexual contact between a teenager and an adult they met online. In those few cases where contact has occurred, it is often because the teenager was aggressively seeking the contact and where the teen was also engaged in offline risky behavior. These cases are typically between a teenage girl and young adult male between 18 and 25.

Law enforcement officials and politicians will point to plenty of Internet predator cases, but the overwhelming majority are either sting operations, in which no child was harmed, or child pornography cases which, while horrendous, are not addressed by this law.

A January 2009 analysis of Pennsylvania cases by the Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use found, during a four-year period, that "only eight incidents involved actual teen victims with whom the Internet was used to form a relationship," compared to 9,934 children who were sexually abused in a single year in that state.

If the law had no negative consequences, I would give it a pass. After all, who cares about the rights of people who have been convicted of sex offenses? Well, I do. Not because I think they're wonderful people but because it's in all of our interest that, if they're not in prison, they be integrated into society to the extent that they can function and be able to find and hold appropriate jobs. Keeping these individuals away from the very types of sites that can help them in their careers is counterproductive to the goal of rehabilitating them.

The other issue is how we classify sex offenders. Not everyone on every state sex offender list is a danger to children. A recent article in The Economist, entitled "Unjust and Ineffective, observes that "Many people assume that anyone listed on a sex offender registry must be a rapist or a child molester. But most states spread the net much more widely."

Citing a report from Human Rights Watch, the article says "at least five states required men to register if they were caught visiting prostitutes. At least 13 required it for urinating in public (in two of those states, only if a child was present). No fewer than 29 states required registration for teenagers who had consensual sex with another teenager. And 32 states registered flashers and streakers."

The article describes the plight of a young woman who, in 1996 at age 17, was charged with having oral sex with a 16-year-old boy. She was given jail time and probation, and wound up on a sex offender list. Should she be banned from having a Facebook account or the ability to publicly comment on posts like this one? I think not.

I'll leave it up to others to debate our sex offender registry policy. Adam Thierer and Robin Sax have just written thoughtful responses to The Economist's article, taking differing points of view, but I do think that we need to be careful about not indiscriminately shutting down social-networking access to all registered sex offenders. Some probably yes, but not every one of them.

Another reason to question this law is that it can lead to more than one false sense of security. To begin with, the most dangerous sex offenders aren't necessarily the ones who are registered but the many who haven't yet been caught and convicted. And if we focus exclusively on predation, we're likely to lose track of the most dangerous aspects of youth online behavior, which are mostly either kid on kid--such as bullying, harassment, and impersonation--or self-imposed risks such as sexting or posting information that could be embarrassing later in life.

CBSNews.com's Declan McCullagh has also weighed in on this case.


Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-19518_3-10309421-238.html#ixzz1490eomsE
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 10:57 am
@firefly,
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/05/myspace_reporte/

MySpace Labels Innocent Woman as Sex Offender — Updated
By Kevin Poulsen May 25, 2007 | 1:11 pm | Categories: Crime

Jessica Davis, a 29-year-old University of Colorado senior, found herself falsely branded a sex offender and kicked off MySpace last weekend, ABC News reports. There is no registered sex offender by her name in Colorado. But when Davis availed herself of MySpace’s appeals process, the results were less than satisfactory

"I want to inform you that I am NOT a sex offender, let me repeat my self (sic), I am NOT a sex offender. You have the wrong person and I’m horrified and appalled at such an accusation," wrote Davis, an English major who lives outside of Boulder and hopes to attend law school. "I would like to know where you got this information and would like this matter cleared up ASAP."

On Wednesday, days after she sent a second e-mail to MySpace, Davis said she finally heard back.

"We do not keep records of removed profiles or images," the response note reads. "If it was removed by MySpace it was because of a violation of our terms and conditions — which can include a number of things (underage, inappropriate images, cyber bullying, spam, etc). Please review our terms for further assistance."

If MySpace really isn’t saving full copies of the profiles it’s removing, there are going to be some very pissed off attorneys general with unfulfilled subpoenas in their pockets — and probably a few recidivist sex offenders breathing sighs of relief. Davis told ABC News that she supports MySpace’s efforts, but is worried that the database it built with Sentinel Tech Holding Corp. will start circulating with her information in it.

Beyond basic confusion, concerns about possible identify theft and frustration at the lack of follow up by MySpace, Davis said she fears that at some point she may have to explain a sex offender label she doesn’t understand — particularly as states, including Colorado, will have access to the MySpace database.

"I do plan to go into law and I want to go into the public sector and I don’t want to have to explain this to people that there’s this Web site MySpace and they screwed this up," Davis said. "I don’t want to have defend my innocence."

Update:

MySpace isn’t talking about this, but Sentinel — the company that built the database for MySpace — has acknowledged the error. Sentinel CEO John Cardillo told ABC News that the system functioned properly, because an actual sex offender existed with the same name, and a date of birth two years and two days apart from Davis’.


"It was so close," Cardillo told ABCNEWS.com. "It was one of those rare instances where there was nothing else we could have done but flag her. If we get an offender and I’m looking at a date of birth that’s two days off, we’re going to assume were dealing with the offender."

Cardillo would not say exactly what pieces of information Davis had to provide to clear her name, citing trade secrets that could help sex offenders beat his database. He added that the experience is likely isolated and may help prevent the same type of snafu from happening again.


When I performed my MySpace sex offender survey, it took manual inspection to distill 744 confirmed matches from thousands of computer-generated leads. I wouldn’t label someone a "match" if their ages were different, unless the photographs were clearly of the same person, and the location matched. Since Davis and her sex offender name-alike don’t resemble each other, it appears that MySpace isn’t taking the same care.

That means we’ll be seeing more cases like this. The incident also casts doubt on the usefulness of MySpace’s appeal process. Responding to Davis’ plea by sending her a form letter falsely accusing her of wrongdoing isn’t Solomonic jurisprudence.



Read More http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/05/myspace_reporte/#ixzz1493bsU8k
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 11:06 am
They can not used the internet now they can not go to church.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Sex offenders challenge laws banning them from churches By Associated Press


RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) -- Convicted sex offender James Nichols said he was trying to better himself by going to church. But the police who arrested him explained: The church is off-limits because it has a daycare center.

Now Nichols is challenging North Carolina's sex-offender laws in a case that pits the constitutional right to religious freedom against the state's goal of protecting the public from child molesters.

"I just started asking the question, 'Why? Why am I being treated this way after trying to better myself?'" said Nichols, a 31-year-old who was twice convicted of indecent liberties with a teen girl and again in 2003 for attempted second-degree rape. "The law gives you no room to better yourself."

At issue in Nichols' case and a similar one in Georgia are day care centers and youth programs at houses of worship where sex offenders can come into proximity with children. Sex offender advocates agree some convicts should not be allowed around children, but they contend barring all offenders denies them support needed to become productive citizens.

"Criminalizing the practice of religion for everyone on the registry will do more harm than good," said Sara Totonchi, policy director for the Southern Center for Human Rights. "With these laws, states are driving people on the registry from their faith community and depriving them of the rehabilitative influence of the church."

Thirty-six states establish zones where sex offenders cannot live or visit. Some states provide exemptions for churches but many do not.

In December, North Carolina state legislators barred sex offenders from coming within 300 feet of any place intended primarily for the use, care or supervision of minors.

Three months later, Nichols was arrested at his home after attending Sunday services. He said he was "floored" to learn that he had been picked up because Moncure Baptist Church has a child-care center for families attending services.

"I believe wholeheartedly if it wasn't for God, I don't know where I'd be today," he said. "God's blessed me with learning how to live a better life."

In Georgia, the Southern Center for Human Rights sued the state in part because the law there prevents offenders from volunteering in places of worship. The lawsuit brought on behalf of Georgia's 16,000-plus registered sex offenders is pending in federal court.

Katherine Parker, legal director for the ACLU of North Carolina, said she was not aware of religion-based challenges to sex-offender laws in any other states. The ACLU is helping in Nichols' case.

Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, said preventing offenders from attending religious services is another in a series of increasingly unforgiving laws adopted across the country. Some of the laws have pushed offenders out of homes and entire communities.

"This case is part of a much larger group of cases dealing with the expansive sex-offender laws," Turley said. "The state cannot sentence someone to a life of being an agnostic or an atheist without violating the constitution."

Some question whether the restrictive laws will lead to more crime.

"It's not clear that there's any public-safety purpose to these laws. They continue to ostracize previous sex offenders in a way that could be dangerous in the end," said Sarah Tofte, a legal researcher with Human Rights Watch. "If they can successfully transition to the community, to include going to church, they are less likely to reoffend."

Some lawmakers say offenders such as Nichols should blame themselves for breaking the law in the first place.

"I'm not denying him the right to go to church. He denied himself that," said state Sen. David Hoyle, the Democrat who sponsored the North Carolina bill. "If they are a convicted pedophile, they have given up a lot of their rights."

Church leaders feel caught between leading houses of worship where broken people can seek help and preventing criminals from exploiting a place of trust.

Joseph Green, pastor of a church that Nichols attended after his arrest, reached out to him while at the same time assuaging the concerns of his parishioners.

"I told him as long as he's honest with me, then we're willing to embrace him and help him focus and get his life back on track," Green said. But, he added, "The Bible talks about wolves coming in in sheep's clothing, so I've got to be watchful over everyone coming into my church."

Most church members were welcoming. "I think everybody deserves a chance," said Shawn Cox, 28, a married father of two who says his faith helped steer him away from drug dealing and crime.

"God turned my life around," said Cox. "I'm not saying that you bring the guy in and put him over the youth program or the youth ministry as soon as he walks in the door. But there's no way he can overcome these things without help and support


ShareThis
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 11:28 am
This woman should be lock up far longer then for a year.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311522/Woman-jailed-rape-charge-drove-ex-try-kill-twice.html

Woman is jailed for a year for 'cry-rape' charge that drove ex-boyfriend to try and kill himself twice
By Mailonline Reporter
Last updated at 9:48 AM on 14th September 2010

Comments (135) Add to My Stories
'Mud sticks, I just couldn't handle it,' says victim of rape lies
Rape claim: Elizabeth Wilkinson outside Burnley Crown Court. She is starting a 12-month jail sentence
An innocent man who was falsely accused of rape by his ex-girlfriend today told how the lies had twice driven him to attempt suicide.
Father-of-two David Lord, 23, was arrested and detained in a police cell for six-and-a-half hours after obsessed Elizabeth Wilkinson falsely claimed he had raped her four times.
He had his fingerprints and DNA taken, lived a nightmare for a month before being told no action was being taken against him by police.
Today shop assistant Wilkinson, 21, of Oswaldtwistle, Lancaster, was starting a 12-month jail sentence after she admitted perverting the course of justice.
After the case, Mr Lord said: 'When the police came knocking on my door my whole life was turned upside down.
'I just couldn't believe what i was being accused of and all the stigma that goes with it. Being branded a rapist is a horrible experience and my first thought was for my children.
'This woman was ruining their lives as well as my own. It just such a relief when police realised what she saying was all lies. But I had to be put on medication for severe depression and I tried to kill myself twice, once by hanging.
'I just couldn't handle it. Mud sticks. All I want now is closure and to rebuild my life. I think she thoroughly deserved to go prison for what she put my children through.'
Burnley Crown Court was told Mr Lord met Wilkinson through Facebook last September when she sent a message to him on the social networking site saying he looked 'sexy'.
Miss Fiorella Brereton, prosecuting, said the pair swapped numbers and Wilkinson phoned him to speak at length and sent him intimate pictures.
They arranged to go to the cinema and Wilkinson said she would pay.
There was nothing to watch so they went back to Mr Lord's home and had drinks with his flatmate.
During the evening Wilkinson texted Mr Lord whilst they were in the living room together and the messages became intimate.
He told her they were not going to have sex that night as it was their first date and he did not know her well enough.
But Mrs Brereton said Wilkinson became moody, wanted to stay and said she was going to sleep with Mr Lord and that was all and he agreed.
Suicide bids: David Lord said his whole life was turned upside down
Wilkinson asked him to get a bag from her car, she then got undressed and they had sex.
The prosecutor said : 'There was no aggressive or violent behaviour on the part of Mr Lord. She left the following morning and started sending text messages to him.'
Later Wilkinson bombarded Mr Lord with text messages, claiming she knew a lot about him and his personal life.
He texted back to say he was concerned she was a little bit too close to his family but Wilkinson then sent further messages saying she wanted to punch his face and sent the mother of one of his children an abusive Facebook message.
When Mr Lord told Wilkinson he wanted nothing more to do with her she then cried rape to one of his relatives.
She claimed Mr Lord had wanted sex, had been 'aggressive and intimidating' and she couldn't stop it. She alleged it happened four times.
Later on September 29, Wilkinson went to the police station, made a complaint about the victim and was examined by a doctor.
She insisted to officers she had not wanted sex and said she was drunk, confused, shocked and couldn't believe Mr Lord's behaviour.
Mr Lord was arrested on October 1, spent six-and-a-half hours in police custody but when he gave a very different account of what happened, officer spoke to Wilkinson again.
The court heard how Mr Lord met Wilkinson through the social-networking site Facebook last September
When police gave her the chance to change her account if she wanted, Wilkinson became 'agitated and aggressive' and said she was the victim.
She refused to give police permission to search her car.
Enquiries continued and Wilkinson was arrested.
She accused the police of saying things to her which had resulted in her lying and still insisted she had been raped.
Police had found more than 80 text messages from her on Mr Lord's phone.
The victim was told on November 1 the investigation against him was being discontinued.
In mitigation Mark Stuart, for Wilkinson, said: 'She had major issues that went back a long way and would need long term psychological therapy. She wants to apologise to Mr lord, the police, court and her family.
'She is undoubtedly suffering from chronic depression and has had some unwanted attention but she has brought that on herself. She has found that very, very difficult to cope with.'
Passing sentence Judge Beverley Lunt said: 'Rape is a repulsive crime and victims should be treated with every possible consideration by the justice system but false allegations can have dreadful consequences.
'You were a woman scorned. Whatever your personal past and problems the one person who wasn't at fault for anything that may have happened to you in the past was this man.'
Det Sgt Stephen Holgate said: 'False reports of rape divert police resources from genuine cases and in making this false allegation Wilkinson has undermined the genuine victims of this horrific crime.'
Print this article Read later Email to a friend Share this article: Twitter Digg it Newsvine Delicious MySpace Nowpublic Reddit Fark Ads by Google:Crucifixion of Jesus
Did Jesus Rise From the Dead?Discover the Facts From Scholars
www.y-Jesus.com/CrucifixionDell.com - Official Site
Limited Time Laptop Deals w/ 2010Intel Core. Act Now & Save Big!
www.Dell.comComments (135)

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311522/Woman-jailed-rape-charge-drove-ex-try-kill-twice.html#ixzz149BELuhZ
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 10:01 pm
The series "Private Practice" will be dealing with the subject of rape.

Quote:
Private Practice takes on dark subject of rape
Tue Nov 2 2010

As last week’s episode of Private Practice, drew to a close, a key character — Dr. Charlotte King — was attacked in her office by a deranged patient. When the drama resumes on ABC and A on Thursday, viewers will learn that, like millions of real-life women, Charlotte is a victim of rape.

The follow-up episode, which carries a warning for “violent images,” opens with a brief depiction of the assault. It then veers from the television norm by devoting an entire hour to the immediate aftermath of the incident, as told from the victim’s point of view.

“You experience her version of the story, as opposed to how the police are dealing with it, or some other outside source,” says KaDee Strickland, the actress who plays Charlotte. “You see the horror, but you also see the humanity.”

Private Practice is the latest in a long line of prime-time television shows that have used rape, and its related issues as a fodder for dramatic storytelling. The teen series, 90210, for example, currently features a character played by AnnaLynne McCord who has fallen into a downward spiral after being raped in a high-school classroom by a teacher. Meanwhile, two gritty cable series — Dexter and Sons of Anarchy — contain plot lines pegged to female characters who are victims of gang rape.

And then there’s the popular NBC drama, Law & Order: SVU, which examines sexually based crimes on a routine basis and features a main character — Mariska Hargitay’s Olivia Benson — who is a child of rape, and a victim of sexual assault.

“Clearly, this subject matter still draws audiences,” says Lisa M. Cuklanz, a Boston College professor and author of Rape on Prime Time: Television, Masculinity and Sexual Violence. “It’s dramatic, emotionally challenging, and potentially controversial without touching on elements of party politics, as an issue such as abortion does.”

Rape on TV, of course, is nothing new. One of the earliest and most controversial depictions in a recurring series aired on All in the Family in the 1970s when Edith Bunker narrowly escaped a serial rapist. And the original Beverly Hills 90210 explored the subject long before its contemporary spinoff. Daytime TV also has a long tradition of examining the issue.

In recent years, Cuklanz says, television has brought more nuance to its depictions of rape, and expanded its scope by examining subjects such as date and acquaintance rape. Mad Men, for example, generated talk two seasons ago when Joan (Christina Hendricks) was raped by her fiancé during an office party.

Television, Cuklanz, adds, has the ability to trump the movies when it comes to plots involving rape because it can follow up on a character or case long after the initial crime — as Private Practice plans to do this season with the Charlotte plot line.

“This offers the potential for subtlety, changes of point-of-view, and character growth over time that are not easily accomplished in film,” she says.

With its substantial audiences, television also has the ability to raise awareness and educate the masses about issues pertaining to sexual abuse, according to Katherine Hull, a spokesperson for RAINN, the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network. She cites an episode of the teen series DeGrassi last year that triggered a “500 per cent increase” in calls to the organization’s help hot lines.

“It just goes to show the power that the entertainment media can wield,” says Hull, who cites statistics that one in six women will be sexually assaulted in their lifetime. “TV plot lines can trigger memories and inspire somebody to take that first step toward getting help.”

Earlier, this season, Law & Order: SVU brought attention to the backlog of untested rape kits—a problem that plagues many big-city police departments. In an episode guest-starring Jennifer Love Hewitt, police struggle to bring a serial rapist to justice largely because evidence had been tainted or lost.

SVU executive producer Neal Baer says he was inspired to do the episode after hearing a grim true-life tale of a woman whose life had been “dominated” by a serial rapist.

“Hopefully,” he says, “it will galvanize people to go to their city councils and police departments to do something about the rape-kit problem.”

In portraying rape, Baer says SVU strives to avoid showing the acts of violence on camera and instead focus on the “psychological aspect and complex issues” tied to a case. He says the subject will continue to be a major story thread this season. This week’s episode focused on a rape-and-murder case that will have “terrible repercussions” for Hargitay’s Olivia.

Hargitay is a prime example of how a show’s subject matter can impact one of its stars in a positive way. In 2004, she launched the Joyful Heart Foundation, a group dedicated to empowering victims of assault and abuse. In a message on the foundation’s website, Hargitay writes that her “eyes were opened” not just by the show’s scripts, but by the many emails she received from viewers “disclosing their stories of abuse, many for the first time.”

Says Baer, “Mariska is a very empathetic person on camera and in real life. She walks the walk.”

Likewise, Strickland says she has been deeply affected by the rape story line on Private Practice. While preparing for the role, she worked closely with RAINN, which put her in touch with two rape survivors.

“We did our homework. We tried to be as truthful and respectful as we could,” she says of the episode written by executive producer Shonda Rhimes. “I believe survivors are going to be very pleased that they’re going to be heard.”

Strickland is also “thrilled” that television is dealing with issues surrounding rape and sexual assault (“It’s getting out there more. It’s a positive sea change.”). And she vows that Private Practice won’t step gingerly” around the subject.

“Unfortunately, there continues to be a stigma attached to it. Some people don’t even want to talk about it,” she says. “But this is stuff we need to hear. If we can help open a dialogue, or prompt people to go to the phone and get help, that would be awesome.”
http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/television/article/884782--private-practice-takes-on-dark-subject-of-rape

BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2010 12:01 am
@firefly,
Quote:
With its substantial audiences, television also has the ability to raise awareness and educate the masses about issues pertaining to sexual abuse, according to Katherine Hull, a spokesperson for RAINN, the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network. She cites an episode of the teen series DeGrassi last year that triggered a “500 per cent increase” in calls to the organization’s help hot lines.


One wonder how Firefly would have reacted if the true story of the UK man who was forced into two suicides attempts by his ex-girlfriend false charges of rape was turn into a TV movie.

Or come to think of it is it not strange that the Duke case of the three students charges with a rape that never did occur had not been turn into a TV movie?

Add protect mobs marching onto the campus led by the new Black Panther Party and eighty-eight professors condemning them led by the feminist study department.

The wanted posters placed all over the campus with the names and pictures of the whole team pay for by a department of the college. Guess what department!

The coach who was fired from his job and the national rank team that was disband as a results of those false charges that should had been dismiss within days of being file by any fair and sane police investigation.

Now that would be interesting TV if far too non-PC to be produce in this lifetime.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2010 07:55 am
@firefly,
I have never watched Private Practice but it sounds like a good show. I'll have to check and see if I can watch it online.

I agree about Mariska Hargitay. She is the reason I watch SVU. She is an amazing actress with the ability to understand every side of sexual crime. Last night I watched an episode where someone was raping lesbians and one had died. It had Kathy Griffin in it, and I do not really like her, but I must say she played her part very well. She was bullyish for most of the show but when she was in danger there was a softer side that I've never seen in Kathy Griffin. Rape reaches into every class and level of society. TV can be a great tool.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2010 10:00 am
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
TV can be a great tool


I agree, Arella Mae. The stories we read in the news tend to be the more high profile cases, and those are the ones that seem to involve more physical violence and even murder. But TV can explore the many other situations in which rape occurs as well as the impact on victims. It helps to raise awareness of a crime that, all too often, people are reluctant to speak about.

Even in this thread, we have had two posters constantly implying that rape occurs, but what's the big deal. They disparage rape statistics, claiming that that the numbers are "pumped up", as if the crime of rape should not matter that much, even if those numbers were cut in half. They resent money given to help combat violence toward women and to help with victim's services. Rather than decry the fact that rape occurs, they not only accept it as "normal" male behavior, they also attempt to justify it. One thing that TV depictions of rape can do is help to change such attitudes in the minds of many viewers. Certainly, shows like Law and Order: SVU have been doing a great job of presenting rape, and it's impact, as a reality in the lives of females of all ages and backgrounds.

Because it is so gender based, rape is a crime that victimizes women as a group, and not just individual women. That is a message that TV dramas can get across very effectively. It is something that practically all women can identify with and most men can understand and empathize with. And it can support efforts to address the problem and it can help to decrease crimes of sexual assault against females by informing people about the sexist bias and myths that can contribute to such assaults. A well done dramatic presentation can reach both the hearts and minds of viewers, and that's what can really help to change attitudes about rape.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2010 11:36 am
A woman in Liverpool speaks about her rape ordeal...
Quote:

Liverpool city centre rape victim speaks out about her ordeal
Nov 3 2010
by Susan Lee
Liverpool Echo

WILLING him to turn around, Karen* stared straight at the back of her attacker’s head as the judge passed sentence on him for her rape.

“He knew I was there and wouldn’t look at me, couldn’t look me and that was my victory,” says Karen, recalling that day only a couple of months ago in Liverpool Crown Court.

“It was my opportunity to face down my demon.

“My friends told me I didn’t have to go to court but I needed to do it for me.

“Every part of me had been on show either literally or figuratively as a result of the attack.

“My body had been given over to forensics, my mind and opinions and recollections had been taken. This was a way of reclaiming something.

“When he wouldn’t look at me I knew I’d finally won.”

Karen, a 27-year-old office worker, speaks with remarkable fluency about her ordeal which took place in January this year as she walked to work.

But her apparent calmness can’t hide the raw hurt which still endures – and the anger she admits she feels towards herself about her loss of control over what was an uncontrollable situation.

“I feel like I should have been able to do something about it. I have always been an independent woman. I was used to being in control.

“But that was taken from me when I was attacked.”

The day that changed her life began, as usual, with a morning walk to work.

Employed in a busy office near the city centre she was usually at her desk early so would set out from the home she shared with her husband to walk through the Edge Hill district.

“It was cold and I was on Tunnel Road walking towards Upper Parliament Street. I remember spotting a dog in the road, a Staffordshire bull terrier. It put me on edge because I don’t like dogs,” she says.

“Then I saw a man but, to be honest, I was more concerned about the animal so didn’t take much notice.”

She hurried on, then heard shouting behind her and felt a hand on her shoulder.

“He demanded my ‘phone and purse. I was very frightened but handed what I had over and just kept on walking, hoping that would be enough.”

But the man pursued her.

“He said he would set the dog on me if I didn’t do what he wanted. Then he pulled me off to one side of the road.

“They say it’s every woman’s worst nightmare and it is.”

Her attacker, later revealed in court as 26-year-old Sean Seerey, sexually assaulted and raped her.

Afterwards she gathered herself and, she says, simply ‘kept on walking’.

“I knew there was a police station nearby and I knew I had to get there.

“I felt totally dissociated from what had happened; almost as if I was outside myself. In circumstances like that you shut down and your brain over-rides everything. Your brain makes the decision that it will keep you alive and takes over.”

The police, she says, were ‘fantastic’ and, thanks to CCTV film from the area, quickly found her assailant, discovering her mobile ‘phone during a search of his house.

Seerey was in custody within hours.

“And that added to the disbelief. It was all so quick. I found myself thinking: ‘did that really happen?’”

She decided to return to work within days. “I never denied what had happened to me and I wanted to try to be as normal as possible. I didn’t want to focus on him. I wouldn’t let it break me.

“My family and friends and husband were fantastic. It made me realise how lucky I was.”

Still, she admits she could never have envisaged how much she lost on the day of the attack.

“You lose belief in yourself. I still ask ‘am I making the right decision?’ about all sorts of things. I wasn’t like that before.”

She says the court case, which saw Sean Seerey plead guilty was, in some ways, an anti-climax.

“I thought it would be another door that would close and help me move on but when it was over I didn’t have it to focus on anymore. I thought ‘where now?’”

Seerey will serve a minimum of four years behind bars but the judge in the case, Judge Adrian Lyon. warned he may well spend the rest of his life in custody.

Karen was offered, and is still using, a counselling service courtesy of Merseyside RASA, an independent voluntary organisation and registered charity started in 1986 by a group of local women.

It offers advocacy, support and advice, as well as a telephone helpline, to anyone who has been a victim of rape or sexual abuse.

“It’s been fantastic but I think I’ve only just scratched the surface of my feelings and that makes me frustrated in myself. I’m impatient and feel it’s gone on far too long but I know healing can’t be rushed.

“I’ve had to realise there’s a big difference between getting better and being better; there will always be a part of me that is raw.”

Inspired by the help and support she received from RASA she is now determined to “give something back” and is organising fundraising events for the charity.

“I have had so much from them but it’s a charity. Every penny is precious. Even if we can raise enough to keep the telephone line running, maybe expand it to be a 24 hour line, then that would be great.”

She is also aiming to do some volunteering herself to help other women. "That's my focus now."

“You know, sometimes what happened feels like a hundred years ago and sometimes like yesterday."
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2010/11/03/susan-lee-talks-to-a-rape-victim-about-her-ordeal-and-how-she-is-using-it-to-help-others-100252-27589515/


0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2010 01:58 pm
Firefly and AM go for the emotions and get upset when someone dare to bring facts to the table so I am sure they are not going to be any more happy with the story below then they are with the fact that reported rapes are at a thirty years low.

Summary -----------------------------------------------
Still, the overarching finding is that neither the Internet nor social networking sites pose unusual dangers for minors. As has always been the case, the underaged are most likely to be the victims of sex crimes perpetrated by acquaintances and family members, even if such cases are seldom featured on To Catch a Predator.---------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/04/study-tracks-changing-profile-of-online-sexual-predators.ars

Study: online sexual predators not like popular perception
By Julian Sanchez | Last updated April 1, 2009 6:42 PM
Even as sex crimes against minors decline, a new report from the University of New Hampshire's Crimes Against Children Research Center released this week found an massive increase in the number of online child predators arrested in undercover sting operations. Despite this, the survey rejects the idea that the Internet is an especially perilous place for minors, and finds that while the nature of online sex crimes against minors changed little between 2000 and 2006, the profile of the offenders has been shifting—and both differ markedly from the popular conception.

Extrapolating from a nationwide survey of law enforcement agencies, the authors estimate that 2006 saw 615 arrests of online child predators in cases involving actual minors as victims (up 21 percent from 2000), and 3,100 arrests in cases where the "child" was actually an undercover law enforcement officer (a whopping 381 percent increase over 2000). During the same time period, the proportion of minors aged 12-17 on the Internet rose from 73 to 93 percent. Those numbers, the authors believe, don't represent an actual increase in the national pervert population, but rather reflect the broader trend over the same period of interactions moving online, combined with more vigorous police sting efforts.

In the vast majority of cases, it's worth noting, the child victims were teens who knowingly went to meet their older interlocutors intending to have sex, which may explain why stings so vastly outnumber actual-victim arrests. Though the victims are too young to legally consent to sex with an adult, relatively few cases involve physical coercion, which makes it likely that many—indeed, quite possibly a majority—don't come to the attention of law enforcement.

Social networking sites, the subject of much angst over online predators, were more or less unknown in 2000, but by 2006 accounted for 33 percent of the initial contacts between (actual) minors and adults in search of illicit sex. While online chat was still the most common medium for indecent proposals, it saw a corresponding drop in popularity—from 80 percent to 40 percent of initial contacts.

But while efforts at protecting kids from predation on those sites often focus on efforts to block registered sex offenders, these represented only a tiny fraction (2-4 percent) of the predators in the survey cases—though about a fifth had a record of some arrest unrelated to sex offenses. Similarly, while parents often worry that pedophiles will use photographs or other personal information on such sites to target kids for stalking or abduction, the authors found no evidence of that occurring. Indeed, all stalking cases the authors discovered involved adults persisting in contacting a minor after the end of (illicit but consensual) face-to-face relationships.

The most pronounced change the study found was in the profile of the adult offenders. The proportion of younger adult offenders, aged 18-25, rose from 23 percent to 40 percent of arrests in cases with actual underage victims, and from 7 percent to 34 percent in undercover police stings. In the former type of case, the authors note, the increase in the absolute number of arrests of young-adult offenders appears to account for the entire increase in that category—no other age group saw similar growth. At the same time, while 40 percent of offenders in 2000 possessed child pornography, only 21 percent did in 2006.

The authors suggest that this may be a consequence of younger adults, who came of age online, being more likely to seek out victims on the Internet than in other venues. Alternatively, it seems possible that the Internet, and in particular the advent of social networking, has simply increased the prevalence of social contacts between teens and college-age adults, who may in turn be more likely to think of each other as peers, even when the law does not. Cutting against that hypothesis is the finding that predators were significantly more likely in 2006 than in 2000 to misrepresent themselves as being teens as well.

Still, the overarching finding is that neither the Internet nor social networking sites pose unusual dangers for minors. As has always been the case, the underaged are most likely to be the victims of sex crimes perpetrated by acquaintances and family members, even if such cases are seldom featured on To Catch a Predator.
User commentsClick here to view comments on this story
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2010 02:42 am
Hopefully this man will now be off the streets for good.
Quote:
Serial rapist gets three life sentences after telling judge to 'rot in hell'
November 03, 2010
Gwen Filosa
The Times-Picayune

A New Orleans man recently convicted of raping two women in the 1990s received three consecutive life sentences Wednesday, after a courtroom outburst in which he told the judge to "rot in hell and suffer."

Judge Robin Pittman replied that maybe he can do that instead.

Then, Pittman sentenced Herbert Nicholson Jr., 58, to serve three life sentences -- one right after the other -- plus decades of even more prison time for his attacks on two women, one in 1991 and the other in 1994.

The New Orleans rapes, in which the victims were attacked at knifepoint while walking alone, went nowhere at Criminal District Court until 2007, when a DNA analyst reported a "direct hit" to Nicholson from the medical evidence stored in both rape kits.

Nicholson, once sentenced to death row for a girl's rape, was defiant throughout his trial both inside and outside the courtroom. In March, the public defender's program dropped him as a client after an "incident" witnessed by several staff members.

Chief public defender Derwyn Bunton said he couldn't describe the incident, but that it made it difficult for his office to continue representing Nicholson, who was appointed new counsel in attorneys Craig Mordock and John Clayton Butler.

DA recommends castration

District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro's office, which secured six guilty-as-charged verdicts against Nicholson at a three-day trial last month, on Wednesday filed a motion to have Nicholson undergo chemical castration should he ever leave prison.

Mordock said he will oppose the state's motion, which arrived without warning Wednesday.

The castration law, signed into law by Gov. Bobby Jindal in June 2008, requires that a court-appointed medical expert first determine if an offender is an appropriate candidate for the process.

Pittman scheduled a hearing about the DA's castration motion for Dec. 3. It's a first for Orleans Parish, according to the DA's office.

"We're simply reminding the court of the law," said Christopher Bowman, a spokesman for Cannizzaro. "The law says it's mandatory for a second offender to be subjected to chemical castration."

Convicted of rape, kidnapping

On Oct. 21, a jury convicted Nicholson of aggravated rape and two counts of aggravated kidnapping, crimes that carry mandatory life sentences. The jury also found him guilty of attempted aggravated rape, sexual battery and aggravated oral sexual battery.

Prosecutors Margaret Parker and Bridgid Collins built a case out of the aging evidence from four separate crimes and presented four women who testified about rapes suffered at the hands of Nicholson.

The only issue at trial was identification of the rapist, who prosecutors linked to the 1990s crimes with DNA samples. Nicholson didn't testify, but his defense was that the DNA couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was the rapist.

In addition to the two women raped on the streets of New Orleans in the 1990s, the jury also heard from two women who testified about their assaults in the 1970s.

Nicholson had pleaded guilty to both cases. In 1973, he admitted to carnal knowledge of a juvenile. In 1976, he pleaded guilty to attempted aggravated rape of a child.

The 1976 guilty plea came after Nicholson had been sentenced to death row for raping an 11-year-old friend of his niece in a car parked beneath a bridge.

The jury had unanimously sentenced Nicholson to death for that rape. But the Louisiana Supreme Court in 1975 overturned the verdict, finding that the trial judge had unfairly given further instructions to the jurors when they announced after five hours of deliberations that they were at an impasse.

At issue in the appeal was the late Judge Bernard Bagert's decision to instruct the jury that it was "important and desirable" for them to return a unanimous verdict to resolve the case, in violation of Nicholson's rights, the high court said.

Nicholson eventually pleaded guilty to the lesser charge, and by 1988 had been released from prison, his defense lawyer said.
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2010/11/serial_rapist_gets_three_life.html

0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2010 02:52 am
An incest victim who maintained her silence about her assaults so her little brother wouldn't lose his dad. Unfortunately, this child blamed herself, believing that she had sinned.
Quote:
News Canada
Girl hid abuse so brother wouldn't lose dad
By Kevin Martin, QMI Agency
October 25, 2010

CALGARY - The daughter of an incestuous Calgary man kept her abuse secret so her little brother wouldn't lose his dad, a Calgary court heard Monday.

Crown prosecutor Martha O'Connor said the victim finally revealed the truth when her mom and stepdad forced her to write a letter of apology to her grandfather for misbehaving.

O'Connor, reading from an agreed statement of facts, said the girl, then 11, wrote; "I no longer respect myself or my body for what I have done.

"I'm guilty and I have sinned over and over again," court heard.

When asked to explain she said "dad has been sexually abusing me," O'Connor told Justice Peter Clark.

"(She) said she did not tell her mother earlier because she did not want to deprive her little brother ... of his father," O'Connor said.

"She thought, 'He doesn't really know his dad much cause he's not really as old and so I didn't want him not to have a dad at all,'" the prosecutor said.

The girl also feared she was pregnant.

O'Connor said she and defence counsel Allan Low will be proposing a joint submission for a sentence of six years in a federal penitentiary when the man is sentenced in January.

She said she would have sought a term of eight years or more on the incest charge had the father not pleaded guilty and spared his victim having to tell her story.

"(She) did not have to come to court today and testify about all of these awful events," O'Connor noted.

The father, who was separated and then divorced from the girl's mother, began regularly sexually abusing her during alternate weekend visits beginning when she was seven or eight.

O'Connor said the abuse involved multiple sexual acts including rape and sodomy and the father also forced his victim to watch DVDs of adult pornography.

"When (she) closed her eyes or had a chance to turn her head away the accused forced her head back to the television," she said.

At Low's request, the father will undergo a psychiatric evaluation and risk assessment prior to his sentencing hearing.
http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2010/10/25/15827691.html


 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 02/08/2025 at 12:20:13