25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
Robert Gentel
 
  4  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2010 10:48 pm
@Arella Mae,
Sorry for the disruption, I sometimes have as much of a problem as anyone else in knowing when to let something go. Hopefully the thread can return to something more closely resembling the original author's indent.

Ya know , threaded discussions would make this so much less painless on everyone (my loquacious argument would be self-contained and easier to peruse around).

OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 12:37 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
I hope the hell you are looking for that post of mine where you claimed I stated I have a child porn collection.

Look like you are going to be joining Firefly in being ban short term<grin>.
Was Firefly BANNED, short-term ??





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 12:40 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Oh I pray no one in your family has anything tragic happen to them and someone shows the lack of compassion and common decency you displayed
hawkeye10 wrote:
My wife was sexually tortured for three years as a child with her abuser brother killing himself and her mother walking in on the act and then claiming that she never saw anything..... both of my girls were molested as kids, one of them raped in the old definition at the age of 8 YO, I am surrounded by the ramifications of sexual transgression, and while you think am a sack of **** for my opinions I have 25 years of loving and caring for sexual abuse survivors experience to know that my way works. I wasted 10 years with the coddling that is prescribed by the saviour community, and it was a massive failure. It was only when I rejected the program that I saw the women that I love heal and prosper.

My opinions are unorthodox, but my approach works.
What is your approach, Hawkeye ?





David
Below viewing threshold (view)
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 04:04 am
@Robert Gentel,
Quote:
Hopefully the thread can return to something more closely resembling the original author's indent.


Robert the original author intent for this thread was not a self help group but as a mean to spread false informations in order to promote her own agenda, at least in my opinion.

Sadly some of those victims got in the middle of the cross fired and the best solution is to start a thread for such victims also in my opinion.

No matter how rare or not rare sexual assaults happen to be one such assault is one too many in the whole country in a year or the world for that matter.

It strange that I know that this website users are not limited to the US however at times I do forget that fact.

Could be because I am still a 1905s to 1960s man and my thinkings as a result center on the US alone.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 04:25 am
Quote:
(CNN) -- Nine Central Washington University students hospitalized this month after an off-campus party were sickened by "Four Loko," a caffeinated malt liquor also known as "blackout in a can," according to a police investigation.

Investigators concluded that none of the students were drugged or given alcohol without their knowledge and no sexual assaults occurred, according to a school statement
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/10/25/washington.students.overdose/index.html?section=cnn_latest

so in spite of Firefly's hyperventilating about the probability that men were drugging women with the intent to rape them, NOTHING nefarious happened.

Quote:
The findings convinced university President James Gaudino to ban "alcohol energy drinks" from his campus.

the way I remember it almost everybody at the party was at the time banned from consuming alcohol, as they were under aged. How typical is this knee jerk reaction to add to prohibitions that already are not taken seriously because they are so ridiculous and demeaning. But Hey, they did something, that is all that counts.
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 04:38 am
@hawkeye10,
Trying to get a handle on binge drinking on colleges campuses to me might be far more helpful approach in many areas including sexual assaults then any other used of resources.

Of course an unenforceable ban on alcohol is not a workable solution, but hitting the little dears from day one about the risks and the drawbacks of binge drinking might have some good results.
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 04:51 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
Trying to get a handle on binge drinking on colleges campuses to me might be far more helpful approach in many areas including sexual assaults then any other used of resources.

These young adults dont take collage seriously because it is not worthy of being taken seriously. They do about half the number of hours of academic work per week as was done before the second wave hit the universities, that being the student revolts of the late sixties where after a fight the administrations capitulated. These young people today have way too much time on their hands to get into trouble. All this hysteria about binge drinking is a con job to divert attention from the real problems of the university, it is a deflection of blaim for the failure of the university from those who run them to what are claimed to be defective students.

Bored young people are going to drink and otherwise get into trouble. Anyone who is shocked by this does not undertand human nature
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 05:15 am
@hawkeye10,
True with a 21 credit hours of engineering courses I never had a lot of free time for drinking.

I can still can remember a group of us would go to a beer/pizza place and after getting them to raise the light level in our corner would order a pitcher or beer and a pizza and whip out our slide rulers.

That pitcher of beer was our idea of binge drinking<grin>.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 07:08 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
As Bill pointed out Firefly started this thread to grind her sexual politics axe,this thread was never about how to heal from abuse, if those people who have been abuse who feel offended by the thread what to talk about those things then they should start a thread about the subject.


No, I didn't start this thread to grind a sexual politics axe, or any other kind of axe.

You are the one who chooses to view crimes of sexual assault as "sexual politics" between the genders. You have expressed resentment that "the one with the hole" (your less than delightful term for a female) has the legal power to deny entrance to her body, and you see this as an affront to a man's need to dominate and express his biologically based "masculinity". You have repeatedly argued that men need to take back the power that has been denied them by the "anti-sex anti-rape feminists". That's your "sexual politics axe".

You have tried to characterize rapes as being "intimate relationships" rather than assaults, you negate the notion of consent by suggesting that men often know better than the woman what she "really wants", you have suggested that women really want to be raped, you describe "conquest" as the best part of sex, you complain that victims have the right to define their assaults as being a rape, you decry the fact that some individuals are considered too impaired, or disabled, or young, to be legally able to give consent, and you generally want the government to have no say in any sexual contacts, including labeling these contacts as assaults and, consequently, crimes.

You haven't really addressed the crime of rape in this thread, you haven't regarded it as a real crime with real injured victims. Instead, you've used this thread as another soapbox to regurgitate your particular views on "sex laws" and your own political agenda on that topic. You dismiss the statistical majority of rapes as being "non rapes", in your particular view, and, for that reason, you want to abolish all laws, including statutory rape laws, that criminalize such conduct. In other words, you have generally argued for the legalization of behavior that is now considered rape, because you feel the sexual assault laws inhibit "free sexual expression". And that political advocacy on your part has characterized most of what you have posted in this thread. You are the one who has consistently promoted an agenda in this thread.

In a thread about rape, particularly a thread which was started to explore rape myths that contribute to facilitating the crime of rape, and victim blaming which contributes to excusing the behavior of rapists and fostering a low reporting rate for rapes, you seized the opportunity to make a case for rape--you were actually promoting rape. When other posters objected to your hijacking of the thread to further your own political agenda, you bragged that the lack of moderators enabled you to post whatever you wanted, whether or not it related to the topic, and, in effect, told everyone else to go to hell. When you were asked, repeatedly, to start your own thread to discuss your particular issues with sex assault laws, since they were unrelated to the topic, you refused, with the rather lame excuse that no one would read a thread you started.

And now you have the gall to say that the rape victims who posted in this thread should have started their own thread if they were offended by your comments? You feel that if rape survivors express their opinions of offense or disgust at someone condoning and promoting the crime of rape that we are letting "the weakest amoungst us decide what can be talked about"?

Yes, your views are unpopular. Yes, your views run counter to existing laws and counter to what the overwhelming majority wish to see as continuing law. And your view of rape survivors as being "the weakest among us" is undoubtedly equally unpopular. But, telling rape survivors to get out of a thread that was very much directed toward rape victims (just look at the title of this thread) is another example of your bullying of people who do not agree with your views. You bully constantly. You profess to have "the truth" and arrogantly insult those who don't agree with you. Tying to hijack a thread is a form of bullying.
Quote:
I realize that this will get me called an asshole. And those who call me that are in my opinion damn fools.


No, everyone who calls you an asshole is not a damn fool. Most of them are quite right.

Your denial of the crime of rape in this thread is not just an unpopular opinion, it is also a view that denies the reality of unwanted sexual assaults and the impact of such crimes on victims.

A news article posted earlier in this thread described the gang rape of a 17 year old semi conscious female by three male acquaintances--an adult male (who videotaped the rape), his teenage son, and another teen who was a friend of the family. The four individuals had spent the evening together and had been drinking. The videotape (and why was this being taped?) clearly showed the female as being unconscious or drifting in and out of consciousness. The police described the tape as clearly showing a rape--the passive female was clearly not consenting (or even participating) in what was being done to her. This was a fairly typical date rape/acquaintance rape scenario, except for the fact that the act was videotaped by one of the rapists. Normally, the female, and a D.A., would have a hard time proving a rape occurred, but, in this case, the rapist provided all the evidence the police needed to know that a crime occurred. This was not consenting sex, this was legally rape.

Your response to the above article was to say that you didn't consider that rape.
This was apparently one of your "non rape" situations. And, had that videotape of the rape surfaced on the internet, you'd likely see nothing wrong with that either, since you advocate for the legalization of child pornography and deny that the subjects of such photos and videos are being victimized and their privacy is being invaded. You don't care if people are raped, or if they are exploited in pornography, you don't care that people are being abused by these crimes,. Your focus is on gaining unrestricted sexual gratification and you don't want anything to get in the way of that, including the sexual assault and child pornography laws.

Your views aren't just unpopular, they are out of touch with reality.

And, now that the troll talk has ended, I am glad you will again depart this thread so that we can return to a discussion of the topic and can focus on the actual, all too real, crime of rape.




Arella Mae
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 07:29 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:

IF all that happened in your life you would understand why your comment to BBB was so disgusting and out of line.
I dont recall the conversation...I would be suprised if I did anything other than use her comments or experience as a jumping off point for an opinion on how we could deal with sexual trangression better.

Do you recall when or where this happened? I would love to look into it.

The only thing I find worse than what you originally said to her is the fact you don't even remember it.
Arella Mae
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 07:33 am
@firefly,
Most excellent post! I think you explained the situation quite civilly and very honestly.
Arella Mae
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 07:43 am
@Robert Gentel,
Robert Gentel wrote:

Sorry for the disruption, I sometimes have as much of a problem as anyone else in knowing when to let something go. Hopefully the thread can return to something more closely resembling the original author's indent.

Ya know , threaded discussions would make this so much less painless on everyone (my loquacious argument would be self-contained and easier to peruse around).


No problem. People are passionate and that's a good thing.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  4  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 08:02 am
@Arella Mae,
Arella Mae wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:

IF all that happened in your life you would understand why your comment to BBB was so disgusting and out of line.
I dont recall the conversation...I would be suprised if I did anything other than use her comments or experience as a jumping off point for an opinion on how we could deal with sexual trangression better.

Do you recall when or where this happened? I would love to look into it.

The only thing I find worse than what you originally said to her is the fact you don't even remember it.


To be honest, I looked and can't find anything. Granted, I didn't read everything on every page... but I did read the 30 or so pages related to BBB. I don't see what Hawk said to BBB that was so "disgusting and out of line". Bill, otoh, was unbelievably insensitive. Something he has since admitted. I do see you as the one who re-posted her story and inflamed the wars when O'Bill showed up. I also see many inflammatory remarks by you and others that, even after Bill admitted he's a dolt, kept the fire burning wildly. If Hawk said something "disgusting and out of line" to BBB as you say he did, then fine. He's asked you and I've looked too. There are lots of posts hidden in these pages, but your accusations should be backed up or withdrawn.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 08:29 am
@Arella Mae,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:

IF all that happened in your life you would understand why your comment to BBB was so disgusting and out of line.
I dont recall the conversation...I would be suprised if I did anything other than use her comments or experience
as a jumping off point for an opinion on how we could deal with sexual trangression better.

Do you recall when or where this happened? I would love to look into it.

Arella Mae wrote:
The only thing I find worse than what you originally said
to her is the fact you don't even remember it.
I gotta say, in all honesty, as far as MEMORY is concerned:
I was in a cab halfway to the airport when I discovered
that I forgot my passport at home; I had to go back; (terrible feeling; danger of lateness).

Too ofen, when I 've taken a vitamin pill,
a minute later I ask myself whether I actually took the pill. (I keep a log.)

MEMORY is not always something that we can control.
People shoud not be condemned for things beyond their control.





David
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 09:14 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Quote:
(CNN) -- Nine Central Washington University students hospitalized this month after an off-campus party were sickened by "Four Loko," a caffeinated malt liquor also known as "blackout in a can," according to a police investigation.

Investigators concluded that none of the students were drugged or given alcohol without their knowledge and no sexual assaults occurred, according to a school statement
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/10/25/washington.students.overdose/index.html?section=cnn_latest

so in spite of Firefly's hyperventilating about the probability that men were drugging women with the intent to rape them, NOTHING nefarious happened.


It is unfortunate that some people need to invent a strawman, just to give themselves the false feeling they have "won" a discussion. Sorry, firefly didn't "hyperventilate" about the possibilily that a date rape drug was used at that party, and firefly is not willing to be your strawman. It was the police who were concerned that a date rape drug might have been used, mainly because most of those who fell ill were female. It is good that the police did consider that possibility because it shows appropriate concern for the reality of date rape.

Although a specific date rape drug was not the cause of the illnesses these students displayed, it is important to remember that alcohol is the number one date rape drug. And Four Loko aka "blackout in a can" is alcohol in a potent form whose effects can be masked by the caffeine in that drink (each can has as much caffeine as a 12oz cup of coffee). Two bottles of Four Loko are equivalent in alcohol content to a six pack of beer. Since females are generally of smaller build than males, they will become intoxicated more quickly than males, and on a smaller amount of Four Loko. And Four Loko's sweet fruity taste is likely to appeal more to females who might then consume more of the drink than they do of other forms of alcohol because it's designed to go down easily, and the caffeine masks the sense of being intoxicated. It would be a rather good date rape drug for those reasons.

Four Loko has already been banned on one campus after many students became ill and required hospitalization.
Quote:

New Jersey College Bans Alcohoic Energy Drinks From Campus
The beverages, nicknamed "blackout in a can", responsible for hospitalization of 23 students
Sara Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com
October 16, 2010

After 23 students were hospitalized for alcohol intoxication at the beginning of the Fall semester, Ramapo College in Mahwah, New Jersey banned all alcoholic energy drinks on campus.

While all brands of alcoholic energy drinks are banned, one brand in particular, Four Loko, was called out by name.

The drink, which comes in 23.5 oz cans, in flavors like Fruit Punch, Blue Raspberry, and Cranberry Lemonade, is cheap (about $2.50 each) and has an alcohol content of 12%.

Consuming a whole can of Four Loko apparently produces the same effect as drinking three beers, a can of Red Bull, and a shot of espresso.

Ramapo College is not the first school to ban alcoholic energy drinks. And this is not the first time mixing energy drinks with alcohol has caused concern.

In February 2010, ConsumerAffairs.com reported on a 2008 study done by the University of Florida about the negative effects of mixing alcohol and energy drinks.

In a study of college-aged adults exiting bars, patrons who consumed energy drinks mixed with alcohol had three times the risk of leaving a bar highly intoxicated and were four times more likely to intend to drive after drinking than bar patrons who drank alcohol only.

Which is terrifying when the average breath-alcohol concentration reading for those who mixed alcohol and energy drinks was 0.109, well above the legal driving limit of 0.08.

Study co-author Bruce Goldberger, a professor and director of toxicology in the UF College of Medicine said, "There's a very common misconception that if you drink caffeine with an alcoholic beverage the stimulant effect of the caffeine counteracts the depressant effect of the alcohol and that is not true. We know that caffeine aggravates the degree of intoxication, which can lead to risky behaviors."

In August 2007, ConsumerAffairs.com reported on concern over how alcoholic energy drinks are marketed.

Attorneys general from 28 states appealed to the U.S. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) to crack down on misleading marketing of alcoholic energy drinks, complaining that the ads suggest they are healthy and are aimed at teenagers and young adults, many of whom are below the legal drinking age.

"Non-alcoholic energy drinks are very popular with today's youth," said Oregon Attorney General Hardy Myers. "Beverage companies are unconscionably appealing to young drinkers with claims about the stimulating properties of alcoholic energy drinks. We urge TTB to take action to stop companies from making misleading claims."

While Four Loko is only sold in liquor stores, one wonders who the manufacturers will hope buys it. The cans are brightly colored; the flavors are fruity and sugary.

Unsurprisingly, it's not just college kids falling victim to the drink. High school students in Mahwah, NJ have been caught with cans of Four Loko, too.
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2010/10/new-jersey-college-bans-alcohoic-energy-drinks-from-campus.html


Some states have already limited access to Four Loko, other states are considering bans on it, and at least one senator, Charles Schumer of N.Y., has called for the FDA to investigate how the drink is marketed. The Food and Drug Administration is already investigating caffeinated alcoholic drinks, including Four Loko, and are asking for justification for putting caffeine in the beverages. The caffeine may make you feel like you're not getting drunk as quickly so you may ingest more. There is also real concern about the safety issue associated with such drinks. Combinations of alcohol and caffeine can bring on cardiac problems.

Quote:

College Students Going Loco for 'Four Loko' Drink
Doctors Warn Health Effects Could Be Dangerous
Giselle Phelps
The 33 News
October 22, 2010
DALLAS, TEXAS

There is the new drink of choice college students are cracking open on campuses across the country.

"It really is popular," College Student Ashley Booth said. It's called Four Loko - an alcoholic, energy drink packed with caffeine and taurine. One 12.5 once can is made of 12 percent alcohol.

" The caffeine is suppose to like heighten the buzz from what I understand, because it helps absorb the alcohol, or something like that," College Student Alex Barrera.

Doctors like Dallas Physician, Paul Worrell, say the mixture in the drink is super concerning.

"I would highly recommend that everyone avoid ingesting caffeine with this level with alcohol," Physician Paul S. Worrell said.

Worrell says drinking too much of it could be a heart attack waiting to happen. He says the risks are even greater for those with cardiac conditions or who are fatigued.

"It could run up your blood pressure, throw you into an arrhythmia, you could pass out from it. It could be a dangerous thing to do," he said.

Many students at UTD told us they have friends who've tried it in large quantities.

"He tried it last night. He drank like three or four of them," said College Student Brisa Izaguirre.

And Izaguirre says, after wards that friend started acting strangely.

"He was throwing my dog up in the air and he actually dropped my dog, but he was just weird," she said.

Doctor Worrells say the alcohol does multiply the effect of the caffeine.

"There's going to be a accelerated buzz off of this and of course that's what a lot of people are going for," said Worrell.

But, he says that booming buzz could be really bad news for your health.

"One time and it made my stomach hurt the next day, so I never tried it again," said Booth.

Doctor Worrell says a number of people have hidden cardiac problems they may not be aware. He says consuming a product like this could bring them on.
http://www.the33tv.com/news/kdaf-loko-alcoholic-energy-drink-health-story,0,3345148.story


Other doctors have warned that consuming too much of a drink of this type could even be fatal.

Quote:

Doctors Issue Warning About Four Loko Energy Drink
October 13, 2010

There's a new party drink on the market, and doctors are warning people to stay away. The doctors say one can of Four Loko is equal to six beers, and too many young people are going to extremes.
Dara Rees
ABC News
Looks can be deceiving...the brightly colored can is landing people in the hospital.

Doctor Mike Reihart, Lancaster (Penssylvania) General Hospital: "I've not seen one alcoholic beverage create this many problems this early on."

For each of the last few weekends, Doctor Mike Reihart has seen about a half dozen people in Lancaster General Hospital's emergency room after drinking Four Loko.

Dr. Reihart: "People come in vomiting, unconcious...with a loss of gag reflex. My concern is when someone gets to the point of intoxication they can actually die."

Four Loko has caffeine like an energy drink, plus 12 percent alcohol, that's about three times the average beer. dr. Reihart says the 23-ounce drink...one can...is equal to 6 beers.

Tom Sagonas, Thirsty's Quick Stop owner: "Yeah, I didn't get it at first but the demand was too much, so we finally brought it in."

At Thirsty's Quick Stop, owners didn't really want to sell it, and now that they do, it's "carry out" only.

Sagonis: "That alcohol content is probably a bad combination to have. People drink it in house."

Young people like Rashaad Day have heard of the drink, and the test is to try and drink four cans.

Dr. Reihart: Some of the patients that I've had, trying to get to that mythical four, usually pass out around three because they've ingested about 18 beers."

Dr. Reihart says it has the street name "Liquid Cocaine".

Rashaad Day, York, PA: "If you drink four, there's a couple of things that are gonna happen. One, you're gonna act dumb. You're gonna get really sick. You're gonna throw up and you can pontentially die."

One doctor says the people coming to the ER range from grown men to girls as young as 16-years-old. Most have severe alcohol poisoning after trying to drink four cans of Four Loko.
http://www2.wjbf.com/news/2010/oct/13/doctors-issue-warning-about-four-loko-energy-drink-ar-957577/


So, while the original news stories about that college party in Washington alerted people to the possibility of date rape drugs, the latest news about Four Loko should help to alert people to some of the inherent dangers in drinks of this type--including it's potential for use as a date rape drug.









0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 10:29 am
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

Arella Mae wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:

IF all that happened in your life you would understand why your comment to BBB was so disgusting and out of line.
I dont recall the conversation...I would be suprised if I did anything other than use her comments or experience as a jumping off point for an opinion on how we could deal with sexual trangression better.

Do you recall when or where this happened? I would love to look into it.

The only thing I find worse than what you originally said to her is the fact you don't even remember it.


To be honest, I looked and can't find anything. Granted, I didn't read everything on every page... but I did read the 30 or so pages related to BBB. I don't see what Hawk said to BBB that was so "disgusting and out of line". Bill, otoh, was unbelievably insensitive. Something he has since admitted. I do see you as the one who re-posted her story and inflamed the wars when O'Bill showed up. I also see many inflammatory remarks by you and others that, even after Bill admitted he's a dolt, kept the fire burning wildly. If Hawk said something "disgusting and out of line" to BBB as you say he did, then fine. He's asked you and I've looked too. There are lots of posts hidden in these pages, but your accusations should be backed up or withdrawn.
I would like to disagree with you; however, I really can't. I was just as responsible for keeping it going as he was and my intent doesn't justify it either.

I thought it was Hawkeye that made the comment about she should have just faked it. I will go back and look and if I am wrong I will definitely apologize. Hopefully, with Robert's thread going, the fray can continue there and not here.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 11:36 am
@Robert Gentel,
Is there some way I can look for a post other than going through every single page? If Hawkeye did not say what I said he did I need to apologize so I need to find the post.
Izzie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 11:39 am
@Arella Mae,
edit: this may be the post you are looking for...

http://able2know.org/topic/158723-140#post-4351261
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 11:49 am
@Izzie,
Yes ma'am, it is. Thank you.

Hawkeye, I was wrong. You were not the one that made the comment and I accused you wrongly. I apologize.

I will not be making anymore comments regarding this specific topic and I apologize for going on so long and loud about it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 02:31:23