Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

Idiot. Contact competent counsel before further displaying your cowardly idiocy.

I don't think that many women really would use a website to just "diss" men they don't like. Considering how internet laws are changing, posting incorrect information such as someone being a rapist, is definitely grounds for a lawsuit.

I do think it is a good idea as long as the women were honest. Rape is such a serious accusation I do not see that many women posting wrong information, do you?

And as far as not being able to get someone's ID because they may be bouncing from here to there? Better think again. How do you think the FBI finds internet criminals?

The very fact that you feel you need something like tor says a lot about your character and you as a person. Demented idiot seems to fit nicely.

I am with you on that Intrepid. Why would someone need something like that unless they are hiding something? And, if he seriously thinks the government can't get his presonal information from his computer, well, let's just say he is mistaken.

There once was a website that was a forum pretty much like A2K except that what it did was provide links to movies. Not that you would buy, but free. It violated all the copyright laws. The government (hmmm, FBI, FCC, perhaps?) closed the site down and got the names and addresses of everyone that had downloaded from that site and a warning was issued to anyone that downloaded from it.

Oh, and don't try to buy any drugs off of these "you don't need a prescription" sites either. Instead of getting your pills in the mail what you will get is a letter from the government saying your order was intercepted and if you continue to try to order in such a manner you may be prosecuted.

I don't speak out of the top of my hat. I speak from experience. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.

The trolls assertion that they have kept this thread "going" is downright laughable. Apart from the fact that they have done nothing except attack the notion that rape is a serious crime, including date and acquaintance rapes, they have done little except try to discredit females by branding them as liars, and ludicrously suggesting that they actually like being raped (by referring to the erotic appeal of bodice-ripping romance novels). Their generally demeaning attitude toward women, including the women posting in this thread, has been striking and unmistakable. That they have perversely remained in this thread, for the sole purpose of discharging their anger toward women, clearly shows just how self-serving their actions are--just as rapists abuse women for their self-serving ends.

Men like the trolls are the reason that rape remains a problem because it is the culture of rape that they keep "going" with their blaming attitudes toward female victims and their promotion of a male sense of entitlement to sex on demand. What is missing from their views, particularly of date and acquaintance rapes, is any conception of the fact that the sex the male seeks might be unwanted by the female, and she has every right to say, "NO' and have that respected, and she has the right not to be raped while she is too impaired to even resist or protest effectively. These are her legal rights, rights the trolls have erroneously claimed do not exist, or rights which they feel are contained in laws which should be ignored because they are unduly protective of victims. Their only advocacy has been for more "rape-friendly" laws--laws that would decriminalize those rapes that they don't want to see as "real rapes", which are, of course, the majority of rapes that are committed. They want women to be raped in social situations without males having to risk any of those nasty entanglements with the law that come with a rape charge.

Their denial of rape, as well as their nullification of the concept of "consent" is quite clear in their comments about the recent gang rape of a 16 year old girl at a rave party in Canada--a rape which was photograped and videotaped by onlookers. Just look at one of the comments made by a troll.


Females go to raves for "wild sex"? So, the female teenagers who attend these parties for music and dancing are really looking for "wild sex"? What is "wild sex"--and why would a female have to go to a rave to find it? Are they looking to be publicly gang raped in front of a group of onlookers who are snapping photos and making videos of the assault? And why would you need a "lot of convincing" to come to the conclusion that a rape happened at a rave--because of your false assumption that the females are looking for "wild sex", because you believe they actually want to be humiliated and assaulted in this way?

Are the trolls so steeped in pornography, including child porn, that they cannot any longer distinguish between real life rape and consensual sex--because the porn has made even gang rape seem "normal" to them? Are normal 16 year olds consenting to group sex, with strangers, in public places, with onlookers snapping photos? Would any normal female consent to such a terribly humiliating public display of herself and what was being done to her--or does the very fact that this took place indicate that the female was not knowingly consenting to what occurred? Do the trolls generally have sex in public places with groups of onlookers snapping photos? Is pornography the norm that governs their perception of real life events?

Just how much convincing do the trolls need that a rape took place? The victim, who sustained injuries, alleges she was raped, that she did not consent to what was done to her. The police, after viewing the videos of the attack, described it as being a rape. What more proof do the trolls need? Do the rapists actually have to confess? Whether rape charges are brought have more to do with the ability of the police to positively identify and locate the men shown in the videos and photos than whether a crime actually occurred. The police already firmly believe that a crime took place, based on objective evidence. If the girl had died during the attack, would the trolls also insist that she wanted that to happen also?

That the trolls deny rape, even when confronted with such obvious evidence of a public gang rape of a 16 year old, is consistent with everything else they've said in this thread--the girl is lying, she really "wanted it", she called it "rape" after the fact only because she was embarrassed, innocent males are being ensnared in "unfair" rape laws--all designed to excuse the illegal behavior of rapists and blame the victim. They demonstrate the sorts of problems and destructive rape apologist attitudes that female rape victims have always had to contend with. The trolls are on the side of the rapists--the female victim is guilty until proven otherwise. Apart from demonstrating these age old prejudices, and their hostility toward females, these trolls have contributed nothing to the discussion of rape in this thread. And the only thing they want to keep "going" in this thread, is their opportunity to continue to repeat their garbage.