25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
firefly
 
  4  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2010 11:24 am
Sure, a troll can pay lip service to a woman's right to decline unwanted sex--but then they question her honesty when she does assert that the sex was unwanted, even if she has to sober up before she becomes aware of that fact. Notice that the issue of whether the male really had freely willing, fully conscious consent for such sexual contact in the first place is completely missing, as well as understanding of the reality that sex with an extremely intoxicated woman is legally considered rape. They defend the rapists. They deny that anyone, except the rapist, is to blame for the act of rape.

This rapist would likely agree with them. He blames everyone except himself too.
Quote:
Convicted Rapist Makes Scene During Rape Sentencing
By Randy Gyllenhaal
October 11, 2010

BURLINGTON, Vt. -- A man convicted a raping a 21-year-old homeless woman in 2004 was sentenced Monday. He'll spend the next 18-20 years in prison.

James Burke, 50, made a scene in the Burlington courtroom, arguing loudly with the prosecutor and judge.

"This is a man who, over the course of decades, has preyed on the weak," said Judge Matthew Katz. "The sentence is 18 to 20 years."

After learning of his sentence, Burke loudly yelled at the judge, using a racial epithet and calling his case a travesty of justice.

State's Attorney T.J. Donovan says he agrees with the sentencing, adding that Burke has a history of shifting blame away from himself.

"He, in his own mind, does nothing wrong," said Donovan. "It's always somebody else's fault."
http://www.wptz.com/news/25359188/detail.html
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Arella Mae
 
  3  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2010 12:01 pm
@firefly,
Throughout this entire thread those two trolls have done nothing but demean women, call us liars, etc. Their behavior towards BBB was more than reprehensible. They have had testimony from actual rape victims on this thread. Instead of trying to gain knowledge about rape and how it is viewed and what can be done to change things they prefer to deflect any information to their practically non-existent (compared to the rape numbers) cases of false accusations of rape.

No one in this entire thread has denied false rape allegations are wrong, can destroy reputations, etc. No one in this entire thread has said anyone should get away scott free from making false allegations. The trolls choose to overlook these facts also.

I am more inclined to believe we are dealing with two children here, whether they be childish in age or in their mind. Their intent is obvious. They want to do nothing more than cause strife, mock, demean, and humiliate others. However, the only thing they have accomplished as far as I am concerned is humilating themselves by revealing their lack of character, lack of compassion, and downright perverted state of mind.

You have been more than patient, firefly, but perhaps it is time for even you to let it go? They do not want to change. They like being the way they are. It makes them feel important if any of us are conversing with them or about them. They are nothing more than mere children who believe even negative attention is attention.
Below viewing threshold (view)
firefly
 
  4  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2010 12:18 pm
The trolls continue this crap of defending rape and defending rapists.

Quote:
We don't place blame or dispute claim for rape, we dispute the definition of rape, we dispute whether a rape took place.

In the case were an actual rape takes place the rapist is to blame for the rape, and often the victim is to blame to putting herself in the position where a rape might take place.


But you dispute actual rapes. You said it would take "a lot of convincing" before you would see the public, documented, gang rape of that 16 year old in Canada as a "real rape". You don't believe the victim, and you don't believe the police, who viewed photos and videos of the attack, as well as the victim's medical records, and have no question that a rape occurred. What does it take to "convince" you that a rape has occurred? Is pornography your guide to what constitutes legal sex?

The trolls choose to "dispute" the legal definitions of rape--definitions that are clearly spelled out in rape laws that are already on the books. And those definitions have not changed--rape has always been non consensual sexual intercourse. So, can one disregard laws one just doesn't agree with--aren't jails and prisons filled with criminals who have disregarded all sorts of laws? Just because the trolls dispute the legal definition of rape, can they claim that these laws, as they currently stand, aren't actually being violated? Does ignoring the law, or making up your own definitions of rape, make the real problem of rape go away? Do rapists have the choice of deciding on their own definitions of rape? Rolling Eyes Should burglars decide on what they consider burglary? Tax cheats decide on their own definition of tax evasion?

This contradictory statement really says it all...
Quote:
We don't place blame or dispute claim for rape...often the victim is to blame to putting herself in the position where a rape might take place
.

They don't understand--only the rapist commits the rape, only the rapist is responsible for the rape, only the rapist is to blame for the rape.

No matter what kind of situation a female puts herself in, or finds herself in, she is not responsible for her rape.

The trolls might want the current rape laws changed, but until that happens, we want those laws enforced.
Below viewing threshold (view)
firefly
 
  5  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2010 12:46 pm
@Arella Mae,
I'm not trying to change their minds, Arella Mae. That's rather impossible. They are too consumed by their own self interest to view the topic with any objectivity.
Both of them have their personal own ax to grind--one feels his ex-wife shafted him in his divorce, so all women have to be liars, the other one wants age of consent laws lowered, and child pornography legalized, to satisfy his own sexual appetites. So we know where these creeps are coming from.

They're not children. They're two bored unemployed men, with apparently vacant lives, who have too much free time on their hands. I see their presence in this thread, despite the insult and ridicule that has been heaped on them, as expressions of their desperate need for some sort of attention, even negative attention. Given the way they feel about women, it's no wonder their wives apparently ignore them. The only thing they have to amuse themselves is threads like this one, and pretending that someone acknowledges their "importance".

I merely use them, Arella Mae, when it enables me to make a point about something else. I couldn't care less about what they think.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Arella Mae
 
  0  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2010 01:18 pm
@firefly,
Then by all means, use them, because your posts are very informative, enlightening, and true no matter how hard they try to paint them as something else. So, you tell 'em sistah!
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  0  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2010 01:21 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
Throughout this entire thread those two trolls have done nothing but demean women, call us liars, etc
Our claim is that it is the rape feminists who demean women, we insist that women are and should be treated as...equals.

Radical concept, I know.
The only problem is you have women on this very thread telling you AS WOMEN what we would consider equal! Who are you to tell us women what we should accept as equal? You and your troll buddy have done nothing but ignore EVERYTHING ANY WOMAN ON THIS THREAD has said! So do me a favor, okay? DO NOT FIGHT FOR EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ME! You haven't a clue!
Below viewing threshold (view)
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2010 01:29 pm
@firefly,
Have you ever read much about Ted Bundy? He, himself, claims that pornography had a lot to do with molding him into what he became.

Quote:
Bundy said he was largely fuelled by Pornography

Bundy says in his interview with Dr. Dobson, that he wanted to get across a message that as a young boy of twelve or thirteen he came across pornography of a harder, more graphic nature. He had been first introduced to pornography at a very young age by his grandfather and there are some that say he may have been abused as a child.

Bundy said in the interview that he was not blaming pornography but he wanted people to understand how that kind of literature contributed and helped mould and shape his kind of violent behavior.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/222008/serial_killer_ted_bundy_blamed_pornography.html?cat=72


It's pretty clear in case studies conducted that most rapists/serial rapists/killers are heavily involved in pornography. I guess the trolls want more Ted Bundys, Dennis Raders, Gary Ridgeways, Jerry Brudos, etc. running around? That would be likely to happen (IMO) if that troll ever gets his way and child pornography is legalized.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2010 01:38 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
It's pretty clear in case studies conducted that most rapists/serial rapists/killers are heavily involved in pornography
so what, you want to go an an anti porn crusade in the age of the internet? at a time when people are already speaking as if they are ready to overthrow the federal government in large part because of what is views as excessive interference in the lives of individuals by the state? At a time when porn is more accepted than it has been probably ever before in history?

Ya, good luck with that...
CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IS ILLEGAL! IT'S IMMORAL! I didn't say a thing about going on any crusade. The only ones around here on a crusade is you and your troll buddy. Strange though, the things you fight the most? They are the things that are closest to your heart. Doesn't say much for you, now does it?
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Arella Mae
 
  0  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2010 01:51 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
It's pretty clear in case studies conducted that most rapists/serial rapists/killers are heavily involved in pornography. I guess the trolls want more Ted Bundys, Dennis Raders, Gary Ridgeways, Jerry Brudos, etc. running around? That would be likely to happen (IMO) if that troll ever gets his way and child pornography is legalized.


So somehow porn somehow created serial killers AM?

My my and the millions and millions of other men who have porn and are not serial killers what about them AM?

Where is the proof of cause and effect here as by your thinking as most serial killers had drank milk as a child then therefore milk turn men into serial killers.

Last note I saw that last interview of Ted and you could tell he was enjoying playing games with the anti-porn nut and little else.
Kindly point out where I said porn created serial killers. I said studies show them to be heavily involved in it. Why don't you really try reading other people's posts before you mouth off. If a serial killer admits that porn had some effect on him, don't you think maybe someone should listen? Oh wait, you don't listen to anything anyone but Hawkeye says, nevermind.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 11/22/2024 at 12:14:55