25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Intrepid
 
  3  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2010 03:18 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:


She and her supporters are not in the majority she is just maintaining the majority of the posters on this thread by being damn nasty to anyone who dare to disagree with her.

We both had watch people withdraw from this thread who was not in total agreement with her line of bullshit due to this.



With normal people there may have been disagreement and discussion. You do not provide anything of stubstance or discussion. You only provide childish rantings and wailings that nobody would want to read. If they could understand your form of writing, that is.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  3  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2010 03:20 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Amazing if true that Robert can be that brain dead.




I doubt that Robert would appreciate your comments any more than others would. Even you should be able to communicate in a better manner than this.
Below viewing threshold (view)
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2010 04:21 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
It is a shame that it has to go so far as to ban alcohol from the frat houses, etc., but if that is how it has to be to help women be safe from getting raped at a party, I am all for it.

This is one of those things where it is definitely better to be safe than sorry.


It was all of the campus fraternity presidents who voted for the alcohol ban--they initiated it themselves. Three reports of sexual assaults, at 3 different fraternity parties, in a three week period, seems to have shook up everyone on the U of M campus. The school year just started, so you really don't expect that many sexual assault reports that close together.

I think this shows some recognition that these young men and women really can't control their drinking very well, and the results can be disastrous. We've had many postings in this thread about the relationship between alcohol abuse and sexual assault on college campuses. Many young men can, and do, disregard the legalities of "consent" when the woman is extremely intoxicated, both because they've had a few drinks too, and because this has been accepted as the norm in the frat houses. This leads to young women being raped, and young men having to deal with the rape charges. So, having a voluntary ban on alcohol at these parties, is a good starting point to try to deal with the problem.

A good part of the problem is that the young men view sex with very intoxicated women as acceptable, and, particularly in a frat house, they may support each other in doing this, and actively encourage it-- the idea may simply be to get as much sex as possible, regardless of the circumstances, and regardless of the emotional consequences to the women being abused for this purpose. So, the only way to begin to tackle that sort of thing, is for some men to challenge that way of thinking about sex and about women and about "consent". That seems to be what the fraternity presidents are trying to do. If you remove the alcohol from the party, you are creating a situation where people have to interact in a much more sober state. That means the emphasis is off trying to get the women drunk just to be able to score with them. And the women don't have to get drunk just to be able to feel comfortable in that situation. Everyone can think more clearly if you take binge drinking out of the equation.

I agree, it is better to be safe than sorry. And trying to decrease the amount of alcohol abuse seems to be a good idea health-wise, given the extent of that problem at colleges.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2010 05:33 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
I doubt that Robert would appreciate your comments any more than others would.


And I should care why he does or does not appreciate my comments?

I had given him and his website many hundreds of hours of my time and the content of my thinking and if he wishes to boot such a contributor off for daring not to be nice to him so be it.



Hundreds of hours of wasted resources. Since not much thinking was evident, you lost nothing.

0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  3  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2010 05:38 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
I doubt that Robert would appreciate your comments any more than others would.


And I should care why he does or does not appreciate my comments?

I had given him and his website many hundreds of hours of my time and the content of my thinking and if he wishes to boot such a contributor off for daring not to be nice to him so be it.
You've given him nothing. You've polluted his site with hundreds of hours of demented trolling for every worthwhile thing you've ever posted. The very presence of demented pieces of **** like the two you serve mostly to discourage more thoughtful posters from posting at all. (Content of your thinking. Drunk )
Below viewing threshold (view)
OCCOM BILL
 
  0  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2010 06:18 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Oh Bill now that you was nice enough to give your correct name and location I think the website that Firefly wish to see up and running where anyone can upload a rape story again evil males would be a fun thing to have in place don't you?
Prolly wouldn't take more than a subpoena ducas tecum to learn your identity and sue you for far more than your worth if you were to do something that stupid.

(Demented idiot… My apologies to all for feeding the troll.)
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 11/22/2024 at 10:00:55