25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Aug, 2010 06:44 am
I was trying to have a conversation with Bill on another thread. One thing I can say for him, he's consistent. He changes his story constantly, insults when you disagree with him, and rarely posts his sources.

If Bill wants to think crime is at an all time low, let him. If he and Hawkeye want to have such distorted views of women and rape, let them.

The crime rate and this thread are two I was really interested in but, unfortunately, due to certain posters, I really don't care to even read in them anymore.

Firefly, I do appreciate everything you have posted. I feel a lot more educated about the subject of rape and its laws.
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 21 Aug, 2010 09:47 am
If you annoy the US government enough it seem you just might be facing a rape charge or two.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Swedish authorities have issued an arrest warrant for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on suspicion of molestation and rape.

The warrant was issued late yesterday, said a spokeswoman at Sweden's prosecutors' office in Stockholm.

She said Assange should contact the Swedish police for questioning about the accusations of molestation and rape in two separate cases "so that he can be confronted with the suspicions".

Assange has denied the charges, which were first reported by the Swedish tabloid Expressen, on Wikileaks' Twitter account.

He implied that they were linked to the release by the whistleblowers' website of a huge cache of US military records on the Afghan war, which were published in collaboration with the Guardian and two other newspapers.

Assange wrote: "The charges are without basis and their issue at this moment is deeply disturbing."

Earlier postings on the Twitter account implied the accusations were part of a dirty tricks campaign against the Wikileaks founder, who has been strongly criticised by the Pentagon.

"Expressen is a tabloid; No one here has been contacted by Swedish police. Needless to say, this will prove hugely distracting.

"We were warned to expect 'dirty tricks'. Now we have the first one."

Last month Wikileaks released around 77,000 secret US military documents on the war in Afghanistan.

US authorities criticised the leak, saying it could put the lives of Nato troops and Afghan informants at risk.

Assange has said that Wikileaks intends to release a further 15,000 documents in the coming weeks - a pledge condemned by the Pentagon, which has demanded the deletion of the files from the website.

Assange, an Australian citizen, was in Sweden last week to apply for a publishing certificate to make sure the website, which has servers in Sweden, can take full advantage of Swedish laws protecting whistleblowers.

He also gave a talk about his work and defended the decision by Wikileaks to publish the Afghan war logs.
Printable version Send to a friend Share Clip Contact us larger | smaller Media
Julian Assange · WikiLeaks
World news
Afghanistan · Sweden
Technology
Twitter
More news Printable version Send to a friend Share Clip Contact us Article history Ads by GoogleA Tea Party Manifesto
Latest Book from FreedomWorks' Dick Armey and Matt Kibbe. Order Today!

www.FreedomWorks.org/GiveUsLiberty

Resurrection of Jesus
Did Jesus Rise From the Dead? Discover the Facts From Scholars

www.y-Jesus.com/Resurrection

0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 21 Aug, 2010 10:00 am
Swedish rape warrant for Wikileaks' Assange cancelled Julian Assange had been cited as saying the release of the allegations was "deeply disturbing" Swedish authorities have cancelled an arrest warrant for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on accusations of rape and molestation.

The Swedish Prosecution Authority website said the chief prosecutor had come to the decision that Mr Assange was not suspected of rape.

The warrant was issued late on Friday.

Wikileaks, which has been criticised for leaking Afghan war documents, had quoted Mr Assange as saying the charges were "without basis".

Continue reading the main story
Related stories
What is Wikileaks?
Weighing the impact of Afghan Wikileaks revelations
New age of whistle-blowing
That message, which appeared on Twitter and was attributed directly to Mr Assange, said the appearance of the allegations "at this moment is deeply disturbing".

In a series of other messages posted on the Wikileaks Twitter feed, the whistle-blowing website said: "No-one here has been contacted by Swedish police", and that it had been warned to expect "dirty tricks".

The Swedish Prosecution Authority website said chief prosecutor Eva Finne had come to the decision that Julian Assange was not suspected of rape and so was not subject to arrest. It said Eva Finne would make no further immediate comment.

More on This Story
Related storiesWhat is Wikileaks? 25 JULY 2010, TECHNOLOGY
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 21 Aug, 2010 11:04 am
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
I was trying to have a conversation with Bill on another thread. One thing I can say for him, he's consistent. He changes his story constantly, insults when you disagree with him, and rarely posts his sources.


Such as the US Department of Justice website!!!!

I do not trust Wikipedia you stated and when I then pointed out that the article in question have a direct link to the Department of Justice website and the table shown in the article was taken from that website directly you just would not address that fact.

Gong back to attacking wikipedia so you are one hell of a game player and little else.

Second note I always give a link or the header tell where it come from as the New York Times or whatever when I first post a fact.

You are once more one hell of a game player.

Third note the crime rate for 1965 was .3 or so less then currently not a meaningful different in any sense of the word but you gleefully jump on it.

So once more you are one hell of a game player.

Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Aug, 2010 01:02 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
I was trying to have a conversation with Bill on another thread. One thing I can say for him, he's consistent. He changes his story constantly, insults when you disagree with him, and rarely posts his sources.


Such as the US Department of Justice website!!!!

I do not trust Wikipedia you stated and when I then pointed out that the article in question have a direct link to the Department of Justice website and the table shown in the article was taken from that website directly you just would not address that fact.

Gong back to attacking wikipedia so you are one hell of a game player and little else.

Second note I always give a link or the header tell where it come from as the New York Times or whatever when I first post a fact.

You are once more one hell of a game player.

Third note the crime rate for 1965 was .3 or so less then currently not a meaningful different in any sense of the word but you gleefully jump on it.

So once more you are one hell of a game player.


I posted more than one link backing up my claim. You disagree with the statistics I showed. So be it. And once again you resort to insults. I don't care to discuss even the time of day with you.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Aug, 2010 01:43 pm
@Arella Mae,
Ignore those two, Arella Mae. They both seem like misfits with rather negative views of women. How could you expect them to be concerned about a subject like rape? They also fail to see it as a global problem.

You might be interested in this article from South Africa.

Quote:

Major Victory Against Hate Speech in South Africa
by Lori Adelman on
March 15, 2010

Last year we highlighted our amazing South African partner Sonke Gender Justice Network in our annual Top Ten Wins for their work in filing a hate speech complaint against Youth League leader Julius Malema. They took Malema, of the progressive South African resistance organization the African National Congress, to court after he told a group of 150 University students that South African President Jacob Zuma’s rape accuser must have enjoyed having sex with him.

“When a woman didn’t enjoy it, she leaves early in the morning,” Zuma said. “Those who had a nice time will wait until the sun comes out, request breakfast, and ask for taxi money.”

As an organization that supports men and boys to act against domestic and sexual violence, Sonke formalized their hate speech complaint against Malema in Equality Court in May. Back in December of 2009, we celebrated this decision as a symbolic victory in and of itself.

This morning, I am elated to report that this victory is no longer just symbolic.

The Equality Court has ruled that ANC Youth League President Julius Malema is, in fact, guilty of hate speech and discrimination, the two charges Sonke leveled against him in the Equality Court following his hateful comments. Malema has been ordered to issue a written apology within the next two weeks and instructed to pay R50,000 (approx. $7,000) to an organization serving survivors of gender based violence.

More from Sonke’s press statement:

“This case makes it clear that our country’s leaders need to be more responsible in their public statements and that civil society can and will hold them accountable. We hope that this ruling will alert public figures to the potential repercussions of their words, both in terms of the impact that public statements can have in perpetuating gender-based violence and other forms of discrimination, and in terms of the legal implications.

“In a country where it is estimated that one in three a women is raped, we need to take strong action to counter myths and stereotypes which can lead perpetrators to believe that they can act with impunity, and which can dissuade rape survivors from seeking health care or justice.”

The press statement goes on to outline next steps for continuing the fight against stigma, discrimination, and gender-based violence in South Africa:

“It is not sufficient, however, for leaders to refrain from making irresponsible comments; we need proactive leadership to mobilise men and boys to take action against gender-based violence. We reiterate our call for men in public positions to be clear and consistent in their explicit support of gender equality and to condemn openly and unequivocally all forms of gender-based violence.

Instead of perpetuating rape myths, public figures should make it clear that rape can happen anywhere, and that the rapist could be anyone: a stranger, a friend, a boyfriend, a husband. There are no rules that say a woman who has been raped will behave like this or like that. We need to make sure that women who have been raped are not stigmatised and are not made to feel like the crimes against them were their fault.”

IWHC will continue to support and partner with Sonke as they continue their incredible work generating support for women’s rights and gender equality – and specifically to educate men and boys about the role they can play in advancing gender equality.

http://blog.iwhc.org/2010/03/major-victory-against-hate-speech-in-south-africa/


It is quite an victory to have such remarks, like these made by Julius Malema, considered a form of hate speech.
"
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Aug, 2010 05:21 pm
It seems there will always be those that make a joke out of anything and everything. Great article! Thanx for sharing it with me.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  2  
Reply Tue 24 Aug, 2010 10:02 am
This is disgusting! ANIMALS! No, let me take that back. They are not even fit to be called animals!

Quote:
As Many as 200 Women, Babies Gang-Raped in CongoUpdated: 1 hour 11 minutes ago
Dana Kennedy
Contributor

AOL News (Aug. 23) -- As many as 200 women were systematically gang-raped by Rwandan and Congolese rebels over a four-day period last month less than 20 miles from a U.N. peacekeeping base in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the United Nations and aid groups reported.

The Associated Press reported that four baby boys were also raped in the attacks that began in a key mining district on July 30. U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky told reporters today the rebels blocked a key road during the raping and looting spree.

The eastern Congo is known as the "rape capital of the world" where savage mobs use sexual violence to subdue the population and vie for control of the "conflict minerals" used to make cell phones and laptops around the world.

Between 200 and 400 armed men began looting and raping women in the village of Ruvungi, which lies near a key mining center, in front of their families and in their homes, The New York Times reported.

A local coordinator for the International Medical Corps, Will F. Cragin, told the Times that when the rebels arrived, they told villagers not to worry and explained they just there for "food and rest."

They lied, Cragin said.

"After dark another group came," Cragin said. "They began to systematically rape the population. Most women were raped by two to six men at a time."

Many women were dragged in the forest and gang-raped, Cragin said. Later they emerged from the forest naked.

The perpetrators have been identified as Hutu rebels from the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda, or FDLR, which is made up in part of those who took part in the Rwandan genocide in 1994.

The FDLR is one of many predatory armies and militias that have been vying for political power and control of Congo's vast mineral reserves – including gold, cassiterite and coltan -- since the late 1990s.

They use rape as a weapon of war, aimed at civilians, and its incidence has been increasing. According to an Oxfam report released in April, rape in the eastern Congo has risen 17-fold since 2004.

Men, as well as girls as young as 4 years old, have been the victims of rape in eastern Congo.

"It's been an incredibly effective weapon of war," David Sullivan, an expert on Congo at the Washington-based Enough Project, told AOL News. "The soldiers and rebels have been able to control, humiliate and dominate whole communities by using sexual violence and terrorism. Rape has become horrifyingly normalized."

The women who are raped are victimized again after being attacked because of the enormous cultural taboos involving sexual violence in the Congo.

"They're excommunicated from their villages and their families," Francisca Vigaud-Walsh of Catholic Relief Services, who is an expert in sexual violence in Congo, told AOL News. "They lose their entire support structure."

News of the attacks came a little more than a year after U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton visited the region to demand an end to the sexual violence, saying she was making ending the widespread tragedy a personal priority.

There was no immediate explanation as to why the attacks were not reported until today.


http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/as-many-as-200-women-baby-boys-gang-raped-near-congo-un-base/19605217?test=latestnews
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Aug, 2010 10:17 pm
@Arella Mae,
I am just stunned. That is unbelievable. It is sickening.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Aug, 2010 06:44 am
@firefly,
It is this kind of thing happening in the world that makes it so hard for me to understand why people think crime (at least in the US) is at an alltime low.

3 to 5 children a day are killed by their parents in the US. This didn't happen in the 50's! How many women raped everyday in the US? It didn't happen in the 50's!
HexHammer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Aug, 2010 04:52 pm
@Arella Mae,
Arella Mae wrote:

3 to 5 children a day are killed by their parents in the US. This didn't happen in the 50's! How many women raped everyday in the US? It didn't happen in the 50's!
Rubbish, it did happen back then, just that the media didn't focus attention on such things.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Aug, 2010 06:56 pm
@HexHammer,
You are telling me in the United States in the 1950's three to five children every single day were killed by their parents but we just didn't hear about it?

Well, when Richard Speck killed all those nurses in Illinois, the whole world knew it. When the Klutters were killed in Kanas, the whole world knew about it and Truman Capote even wrote a book about it. I lived in the fifties. We heard about murders. I would say if three to five children every day were being killed by their parents we would have known about it. If you can provide proof of this, I'd be more than willing to look at it.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2010 02:27 am
@Arella Mae,
The increase is also true in the U.K.

Quote:
The study shows for the first time the dramatic rise in the number of child homicides over a five-year period, with the number of killings doubling from 28 in 2004 to 56 in 2007...Incomplete figures for 2008 suggest the upward trend is continuing, and children are being killed by their so-called carers at the rate of one a week.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/one-child-in-britain-is-killed-like-baby-peter-every-week-1740220.html
0 Replies
 
HexHammer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2010 04:44 am
@Arella Mae,
Arella Mae wrote:

You are telling me in the United States in the 1950's three to five children every single day were killed by their parents but we just didn't hear about it?

Well, when Richard Speck killed all those nurses in Illinois, the whole world knew it. When the Klutters were killed in Kanas, the whole world knew about it and Truman Capote even wrote a book about it. I lived in the fifties. We heard about murders. I would say if three to five children every day were being killed by their parents we would have known about it. If you can provide proof of this, I'd be more than willing to look at it.
Compulsive killing isn't something that suddenly appeared in the last decades, it has always been around, and I'm sure you mean "it didn't happen on the same scale", I'm quite sure it did, just that the social office didn't have evolved procedures to identify and take care of such problems.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2010 07:43 am
@HexHammer,
Please show me statistics from the 1950's where 3 to 5 children were killed by their parents every single day in the US. I am telling you, 3 to 5 everyday didn't happen. I would be more than willing to look at any proof you can offer to show me I am wrong.

There is nothing new under the sun. Of course, these crimes happened back then. They have been happening since the dawn of time. But in the 1950's there is no way 3 to 5 children a day were killed by their parents. That is not something that could have been kept quiet.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2010 09:09 am
I am having absolutely no luck in finding statistics for filicide in the 1950's.
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2010 10:51 am
Love the fact that any woman can drag any man good name into the mud on a false rape charge and then just walk away with a slap on the wrist!!!!!!!!!!

One wonder how many people will know that Copperfield was charge with rape compare to the number who will hear the rest of the story!

No we can not grant the same level of protection to the man as to the woman and not released his name until he is convicted either!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2012585456_copperfield11m.html

obstructing a police officer
An aspiring model who claims she was raped by magician David Copperfield on his private island in 2007 has pleaded guilty to a charge of obstructing a Bellevue police officer in a separate matter.

By Mike Carter

Seattle Times staff reporter

PREV of NEXT




Lacey Carroll
Related
An aspiring model who claimed she was raped by magician David Copperfield on his private island in 2007 has pleaded guilty to a charge of obstructing a Bellevue police officer in a separate matter.

Lacey Carroll, who entered the plea Monday in Bellevue District Court, was ordered to pay a $953 fine and to complete 30 hours of community service before the end of the year. Carroll also must attend an alcohol-awareness class.

If she stays out of trouble, the charge will be dismissed and her record cleared, said Bellevue City Attorney Susan Irwin. The plea came after Bellevue prosecutors agreed to drop prostitution and false-statement charges against Carroll, 23.

Irwin said the plea agreement was fair — Carroll has no prior criminal history — and it spared the city the cost of a trial. Moreover, the obstruction charge is a gross misdemeanor, which carries a more serious potential penalty than a charge of prostitution. Irwin said the obstruction charge stems from Carroll's reluctance to cooperate with the police investigation.

"It means we can monitor her longer," Irwin said.

Carroll's attorney, Robert Flennaugh, said Carroll would have demanded a trial if the prostitution and false-statement charges had not been dismissed.

"She would have fought it, because she is not a prostitute or a liar," he said. "Lacey is done with the courts. She just wants to put this behind her and get on with her life."

Carroll's arrest on prostitution and extortion charges — in January, after a night of drinking with a man she met in a bar — couldn't have been more untimely. It came as federal prosecutors were looking into her rape allegations against Copperfield and just months after she sued him in U.S. District Court in Seattle.

Federal prosecutors dropped their rape investigation after learning of the alleged prostitution case. They would not say there was a link between their decision not to charge Copperfield and the Bellevue investigation.

Carroll, the first runner-up in the 2010 Miss Washington USA pageant, dropped her lawsuit in April, claiming Copperfield was using his wealth to "relentlessly attack" her, her family and friends.

Carroll said she met Copperfield at a performance in Kennewick, and he invited her to Musha Cay, his $50 million, 150-acre private island in the Bahamas. Once there, she claims, she was isolated from the other guests and she alleged Copperfield sexually assaulted her.

Copperfield has disputed her claims, saying there were dozens of people on the island and that she could have left at any time.



In a statement prepared after consulting with their client, Copperfield attorneys Patty Eakes and Angelo Calfo on Tuesday said Carroll "admitted to lying to police about the rape because she had to. Her lies were caught on tape, so she plea-bargained her way out of a jail sentence.

"Her guilty plea shows that her claim that she was blacked out was nothing more than another Lacey Carroll hoax," they said. "Now she's a convicted liar; she's a disgrace to women who have been truly victimized."

Carroll was charged in the Bellevue case after a 31-year-old Mukilteo businessman claimed she accompanied him to a hotel room, where she allegedly told him, "put $2,000 in my purse and you can have it all."

When he refused, the man said, Carroll left the room and went to the lobby, where he said he found her telling hotel staff that she had been "taken advantage of," according to police reports. Worried that he was about to be extorted, the man called police.

Carroll also reported the incident, saying she woke up from an alcohol blackout to find herself undressed in the room with the man.

She told police at one point that she didn't want to pursue the case because she was worried it might impact her lawsuit against Copperfield.

Mike Carter: 206-464-3706 or [email protected]

Seattle Times news researcher Gene Balk contributed to this report, which includes information from Times archives.

What's this? E-mail article Print view Share


You might be interested in:
Bicycles banned in Colorado town From Seattle Times Nation & World
Truth Needle | False: Murray's statement about teachers' jobs From Seattle Times Local News
Online ranters increasingly pay a price From Seattle Times Nation & World
Man arrested in Redmond in connection with triple killing From Seattle Times Local News
Selected for you by a sponsor:
WikiLeaks founder: site getting tons of "high caliber" disclosures From CNN - Technology
Husky Killed by Off-Duty Cop From About.com


More Local News
UPDATE - 7:35 AM
Cars damaged in West Seattle fire early Thursday morning

appeal to the community to work with us to fight against crime.
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2010 10:59 am
@Arella Mae,
Arella Mae wrote:

I am having absolutely no luck in finding statistics for filicide in the 1950's.


I checked as well. Couldn't find anything prior to 1971 and that was for the U.K. It seemed to indicate that the numbers have stayed about 45 per million in that period. Not really pertinent without data breakdown.
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2010 11:13 am
@Intrepid,
I appreciate you trying to help me find some!
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2010 11:17 am
@BillRM,
Wow, not a word to say about 200 women and small children being raped but a lot to say about poor David Copperfield. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 05:25:08