1
   

Op-Ed Obama and the 'They' Sayers

 
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 07:46 am
@aaronssongs,
Hoorah!!!
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 10:38 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;29005 wrote:
Hoorah!!!


We're WRITERS, D-Man. We da chit.:headbang: Very Happy Very Happy :headbang:
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 11:11 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;28999 wrote:
No.....just another insightful viewpoint. Have you ever listened to Hans Blix? The guy is brilliant, and no....he's not a GW stooge. Taking out Saddam Hussein was a reasonable, strategic move, given the nature and location of our WOT. Sure, it turned out to be very costly and controversial, but it was a reasonable strategic action. Do you actually believe Saddam Hussein would've refrained from exploiting our problems with AQ and the Taliban? C'mon. :no:


your still trying to link saddam and AQ,bin-laden hated saddam,and hans blix was against the invasion of iraq.
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 11:15 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;29000 wrote:
Scoob, I admire GW and consider him a great President. Yeah....you heard me, on here, HE IS A GREAT MAN. The American Left will never be the same again. Laughing

Don't you silly kids realize that as long as our WOT in linked to Israel's security, THE US WILL NEVER PULL OUT OF IRAQ? Muslims can't defeat the US-Israel alliance. It's invincible, and unbreakable. Cry if you will. They're wasted tears.:happybirthday: Laughing Laughing Laughing :happybirthday:


"THE US WILL NEVER PULL OUT OF IRAQ" your casualties are only gonna get a hell of a lot worse.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 01:50 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;29022 wrote:
"THE US WILL NEVER PULL OUT OF IRAQ" your casualties are only gonna get a hell of a lot worse.


So will the enemy's. And yes, we'll eventually pull out, but not for a long time. It's always good to kill the Enemy. Sometimes victory must be unconventionally defined.:no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no:
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 01:55 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;29021 wrote:
your still trying to link saddam and AQ,bin-laden hated saddam,and hans blix was against the invasion of iraq.


"My enemy's enemy is my friend."

If Hans opposed the invasion, much of his post-invasion commentary didn't reflect that sentiment. I listened carefully to several of his interviews. He conceeded readily that SH acted as though he had WMDs. Given our WOT, any leader of a rogue nation in the Middle East who behaved that way could expect attack. If you act dangerous, you might get taken out as a result. :headbang:
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 02:01 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;29254 wrote:
So will the enemy's. And yes, we'll eventually pull out, but not for a long time. It's always good to kill the Enemy. Sometimes victory must be unconventionally defined.:no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no:


SICK!!!
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 06:34 pm
@aaronssongs,
SH would've messed with us, big time, the more engaged we became in Afghanistan. Nah....that old skank had to go.
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 12:25 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;29256 wrote:
"My enemy's enemy is my friend."

If Hans opposed the invasion, much of his post-invasion commentary didn't reflect that sentiment. I listened carefully to several of his interviews. He conceeded readily that SH acted as though he had WMDs. Given our WOT, any leader of a rogue nation in the Middle East who behaved that way could expect attack. If you act dangerous, you might get taken out as a result. :headbang:


"he acted as though he had WMDs" what a great reason for invading iraq,and hans blix,was against the invasion pino !
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 01:26 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;29315 wrote:
"he acted as though he had WMDs" what a great reason for invading iraq,and hans blix,was against the invasion pino !


Scooby,
These folk suffer from delusions...it must be a malady which strikes only Republicans and conservatives. They live in another universe...where up is down, black is white, imaginary WMD's are to be pursued, chase bin Laden, don't chase bin Laden...oooh, look, let's chase Saddam...it's not a civil war, well, maybe it is....we've got to get them before they come and get us (they did get us....well, we just gotta get 'em)...border patrol, homeland security...all fantasy...sad, and dangerous...they have to be stopped..at all cost.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 04:01 pm
@aaronssongs,
Quote:
where up is down, black is white,
So to us your white? And you discriminate against blacks, nice.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 04:26 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;29258 wrote:
SICK!!!


LIFE AS A SUPER-POWER!:headbang:
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 04:28 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;29327 wrote:
Scooby,
These folk suffer from delusions...it must be a malady which strikes only Republicans and conservatives. They live in another universe...where up is down, black is white, imaginary WMD's are to be pursued, chase bin Laden, don't chase bin Laden...oooh, look, let's chase Saddam...it's not a civil war, well, maybe it is....we've got to get them before they come and get us (they did get us....well, we just gotta get 'em)...border patrol, homeland security...all fantasy...sad, and dangerous...they have to be stopped..at all cost.


Easy, Chief. Easy. Slow down. Listen to the voice of John Wayne within you:
"Talk low, slow, and don't say too much.":headbang:
0 Replies
 
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 04:35 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;29364 wrote:
So to us your white? And you discriminate against blacks, nice.


Are you really that stupid, and so lacking of understanding of the English language, that you continually make simple mistakes in syntax and grammar?
It's not "your"...it's you're...two different word forms, meaning two different things. And since your undeveloped mind cannot understand "deeper meanings" than what lies on the surface, my reference to "black and white", was "global", not "specific", and specifically, not referring "to myself"....Am I dealing with mental retards, or grown men having a difficult time carrying on intelligent discourse? Really!
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 04:43 pm
@aaronssongs,
I don't give a crap, i will put "your" anytime i wish. Don't like it, don't read it.
Quote:
Am I dealing with mental retards, or grown men having a difficult time carrying on intelligent discourse? Really!
It's pretty sad when you can't dictate how the conversation goes huh?
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Aug, 2007 12:01 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;29364 wrote:
So to us your white? And you discriminate against blacks, nice.


this comes from a guy who keeps making references to OBAMA'S name !
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Aug, 2007 12:03 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;29388 wrote:
Are you really that stupid, and so lacking of understanding of the English language, that you continually make simple mistakes in syntax and grammar?
It's not "your"...it's you're...two different word forms, meaning two different things. And since your undeveloped mind cannot understand "deeper meanings" than what lies on the surface, my reference to "black and white", was "global", not "specific", and specifically, not referring "to myself"....Am I dealing with mental retards, or grown men having a difficult time carrying on intelligent discourse? Really!


well they did vote for BUSH :eek: what do you expect aaron.
0 Replies
 
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Aug, 2007 01:08 pm
@aaronssongs,
This is a racist thread.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Aug, 2007 01:52 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;29388 wrote:
Are you really that stupid, and so lacking of understanding of the English language, that you continually make simple mistakes in syntax and grammar?
It's not "your"...it's you're...two different word forms, meaning two different things. And since your undeveloped mind cannot understand "deeper meanings" than what lies on the surface, my reference to "black and white", was "global", not "specific", and specifically, not referring "to myself"....Am I dealing with mental retards, or grown men having a difficult time carrying on intelligent discourse? Really!


A-Ron, do you realize that in this writing critique/rant, you misspelled a word and once again, your punctuation is screwed up? What gives? You claim to be able to teach that which you cannot do? No thanks. That's whack.:thumbdown: :FU1: :FU1: :FU1: :FU1: :thumbdown:
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Aug, 2007 01:53 pm
@aaronssongs,
I really believe the only racist amongst us is A-Ron. It doesn't bother me, though. I refuse to give in to racism. I belong to God, and the Catholic Church. I won't go there, no matter how irresponsibly others might act.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.88 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 02:55:02