Dis Chavez and get exiled!

The fact that this idiot is exiling any one that dissents trumps all other actions. He's just another little man with a frail ego and a small penis.

Sounds kind of like what Augusto did, oh wait no, he tortured and killed them, nevermind.

But they were all Commies? What's your point??????

:scratchchin: :devilheadbang: :devilheadbang: :devilheadbang: :devilheadbang: :scratchchin:

YOUR JUST A RIGHT-WING REDNECK PINO :thumbup:

But they were all Commies? What's your point??????

The point is, it is ***ed up policy, and baffoons that support it are equally ***ed in the head.

We have had a bad habit of backing groups and leaders based on nothing more than a temporary eye to eye view, and it has turned what was the greatest nation ever into a hypocritical cesspool of greed and corruption. In 1953 we helped sponsor the coup to overthrow Mohammed Mossadeq so that the Bristish could keep Iran from nationalizing and controlling their own oil, and to keep close to communist Russia. That turned out real nice, remember Ayatollah Khomeini? Then there was the debacle in the congo in 1960, that was a fun one. Or how about us arming the same peoples we are now fighting? You know, the mujahideen. We had to make sure those nasty ruskies didn't spread, so yea, lets arm a bunch of islamic fundamentalist, smoooth move. Haiti? Oh yea, did that one too. Then there's always your personal favorite, Pinochet, as western friendly as you want to paint him, he was a ***ing murderous bastard, and it's a disgrace we sponsored such a scumbag. We really lowered our morals on that one. And of course our failed littel expedition down south in Venezuela. And lets not forget that some think it's a great idea now arming the sunnis so they can fight AQ in Iraq. These are the same ***ers that have been VBIEDing our bases, and killing their own civilians, but now since they don't like the way AQ is doing things, we somehow have come to the conclusion it's a good idea to give them more guns? Yea, ok, riiight. With their distrust of Americans, and their being pissed off for not being included in the puppet government we installed, I, for some crazy reason, have my reservations about this move.

The point being, we constantly lower our morals as a nation, and spit on the graves of those that have died for it everytime we sponsor yet another murderous thug in the name of "fighting communism", or "fighting terrorism". As a nation we need to hold ourselves to a higher standard, and truely be a world leader. A country others want to model themselves after.

Pino my friend, I support you 100% as I so Dr and a few others. That does not mean that I do not agree with 92B on issues. Some of his positions are right on point. I prefer to keep an open mind, but I like your style, to be sure.

The point is, it is ***ed up policy, and baffoons that support it are equally ***ed in the head.

We have had a bad habit of backing groups and leaders based on nothing more than a temporary eye to eye view, and it has turned what was the greatest nation ever into a hypocritical cesspool of greed and corruption. In 1953 we helped sponsor the coup to overthrow Mohammed Mossadeq so that the Bristish could keep Iran from nationalizing and controlling their own oil, and to keep close to communist Russia. That turned out real nice, remember Ayatollah Khomeini? Then there was the debacle in the congo in 1960, that was a fun one. Or how about us arming the same peoples we are now fighting? You know, the mujahideen. We had to make sure those nasty ruskies didn't spread, so yea, lets arm a bunch of islamic fundamentalist, smoooth move. Haiti? Oh yea, did that one too. Then there's always your personal favorite, Pinochet, as western friendly as you want to paint him, he was a ***ing murderous bastard, and it's a disgrace we sponsored such a scumbag. We really lowered our morals on that one. And of course our failed littel expedition down south in Venezuela. And lets not forget that some think it's a great idea now arming the sunnis so they can fight AQ in Iraq. These are the same ***ers that have been VBIEDing our bases, and killing their own civilians, but now since they don't like the way AQ is doing things, we somehow have come to the conclusion it's a good idea to give them more guns? Yea, ok, riiight. With their distrust of Americans, and their being pissed off for not being included in the puppet government we installed, I, for some crazy reason, have my reservations about this move.

The point being, we constantly lower our morals as a nation, and spit on the graves of those that have died for it everytime we sponsor yet another murderous thug in the name of "fighting communism", or "fighting terrorism". As a nation we need to hold ourselves to a higher standard, and truely be a world leader. A country others want to model themselves after.

excellent post,spot on :thumbup:

There you go again, Scoob -- jumping on any and every opportunity to stand against America.

You think my comments are against America? Quite the contrary. Our government has screwed us up, and someone needs to fix us. If you think all these revolutions, and counter revolutions, and supporting those that would kill us in our sleep so big money companies can make a buck producing war goods is a good thing, you priorities for America are askew.

Like it or not, our economy, the biggest and richest in the world, is mostly operated by corporations. As a society, we decided to adopt the corporate model, as opposed to the local farming model, economically speaking, around the year 1900. We've been a strongly corporation-led people every since. That's what we are. To oppose all corporatism in America is very counter-productive. It's in our blood. WE NEED CORPORATIONS, IF WE WANT TO REMAIN RICH, STRONG AND FREE.:headbang:

There you go again, Scoob -- jumping on any and every opportunity to stand against America. I wish I knew more about Scotland, just to pay you back. But, I don't. Scotland is mysteriously quiet, except for when Dick and Bush attacked it with car-bombs not too long ago. I salute the Scottish cab-driver and other bystanders who gave those terrorists a good thrashing on sight. Those are the kind of folks you need to associate with more, Scoob. They're heroes. Unlike you and I, they actually did something in the WOT.:headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

i dont agree with 92b on everthing,but his post was spot on :thumbup:

Scoob, you won't be satisfied until the US implodes and ceases to exist as a nation. But.....your celebration will be short-lived. When we're gone, YOU WILL BECOME MUSLIM, or get your fiery redhead cut off.:bangin: :bangin:

no pino,i want the bush and the neo-cons to implode,i think the US is a great country,so why would i want it too cease to exist as a nation ? as for becoming a muslim,i can assure you,they're is no chance of that happening,you have a strange fascination,with the people of the UK and EUROPE becoming muslims.

Yeah...because my life-long study of history has convinced me that the only reason Europe didn't succumb to the Moslems in anitquity was its burning desire to remain Christian. Since then, Europe has abandoned Christianity, and now has nothing to protect it from a new-age, Islamic assault. Face it -- you're weak. You've lost your cultural identity. You swapped out Christianity for socialism, and you now cling to the latter, even after watching your sacred-cow of an empire (USSR) cave in under its own dead weight. You guys are toast. Muslim fanaticism will eventually lay waste to your tired out, whimpy, secular-progressive ideology. It's unsustainable because it's disgustingly shallow.:thumbdown:

what the hell are you talking about ? europe still is predominantly christian,whether it be catholic,protestant or orthodox,although form what i know most europeans dont attend church,or like myself,are not religous,you can be a christian and a socialist pino,they're are plent in europe,as for your "even watching your sacred cow of an empire (USSR) cave in under its own dead weight" i have said before,i was not a supporter of the soviet union and the warsaw pact,I AM NOT A COMMUNIST,i class myself as a social democrat,get your facts right.

Christians who don't go to church are fake Christians. If they can't even attend church, they're sure as hell not going to fight for their Christian identity or society. They will cave, when pressured by fanatical Islam, a stronger strain of religiosity than what they possess. And no....Socialism is a diet-variety of Marxism. When pushed, Socialists will gravitate to the far Left, and eventually become hardcore Reds. I don't buy your ambiguity. It's intentionally deceptive. I won't be deceived. Man's natural rights can't be realized under any form of tyranny. That's what Socialism demands first and foremost -- worship of the 'Almighty State', and suppression of all expressions and forms of individuality. No thanks, Marx. Your 'facts' are a pack of lies.