1
   

Democrats now want to Ban the War on Terror

 
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 08:26 am
@trappedbyparties,
trapped.by.parties;15493 wrote:
Well i lean more to the right than the left, and i don't have hardly any money, altho i do live in the south. If by "countryflok" you mean people who want what is best for the country, then you are correct. I would strongly consider myself "countryfolk". And besides that, i see alot more trust fund babies who went to private schools on the lib side anyways. That my friend is sheltered. The fantasy world you people live in is repulsive. Libs would ban expelling flatulance if they thought it would save the world from "Global Warming". Intelligence means nothing if you don't know how to use it.(properly)
You said it alot more elequinte then i chose to. I think it's funny that these bostonian openminded tolerant elitists find it neccessary to congregate in exclusive metropolitans, shows alot in the way of what they really feel about openminded tolerence? Seems the only ones they like tolerating is themselves.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 08:34 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;15506 wrote:
Seems the only ones they like tolerating is themselves.


By labeling oneself left right, liberal or neocon by default the tolerance level has dropped. The simple need to be, or to label(ed) indicates a predisposition to intolerance based simply on a label. Fact is, labels don't mean anything, it just an excuse to warmonger among ourselves.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 08:42 am
@Silverchild79,
Your one to talk? Label any religious people lately?
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 08:44 am
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;15508 wrote:
By labeling oneself left right, liberal or neocon by default the tolerance level has dropped. The simple need to be, or to label(ed) indicates a predisposition to intolerance based simply on a label. Fact is, labels don't mean anything, it just an excuse to warmonger among ourselves.
Your one to talk? Label any religious people lately? Or it is OK to label religion and not label "oneself left right, liberal or neocon by default?"
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 09:23 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;15511 wrote:
Your one to talk? Label any religious people lately? Or it is OK to label religion and not label "oneself left right, liberal or neocon by default?"


I am not religious, I call zealots zealots, but I do not hate, or have malice simply based on the fact that one chooses to practice religion, or specificaly chooses catholic, lutheren, mormon, islam etc, just like I will call BS on someones point fo view no matter what political affiliation they hold. Anyone that uses their religion as a vehicle for promotion of agenda pretty much falls into the catagory I am talking about.

Good try though, but next time make a relevant accusation.
I Understand
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 12:31 pm
@trappedbyparties,
trapped.by.parties;15493 wrote:
Well i lean more to the right than the left, and i don't have hardly any money, altho i do live in the south. If by "countryflok" you mean people who want what is best for the country, then you are correct. I would strongly consider myself "countryfolk". And besides that, i see alot more trust fund babies who went to private schools on the lib side anyways. That my friend is sheltered. The fantasy world you people live in is repulsive. Libs would ban expelling flatulance if they thought it would save the world from "Global Warming". Intelligence means nothing if you don't know how to use it.(properly)


Listen, I am 22 years old. My parents barely make $40,000 a year together in one of the most expensive states to live in. I almost make double what they make combined in a year and I got it for myself. I was raised basically to get everything myself. I have lived in predominately black neighborhoods and the "ghettos". I am not sheltered. Anyone that follows scientific reports knows that the polar ice caps are melting at a very fast rate. I don't mean the scientific reports funded by Exxon-Mobil either. All the data points towards carbon emissions having a role on speeding up this process. The Earth may be in a period of climate change ,but our carbon loving society is speeding up the process in which millions of lives could be lost due to the sea levels raising 50 ft. Thats the smart thing to do my friend. Funding a "war on terror" which the US will never win is not an intelligent thing to do. We keep losing more and more of our soldiers to a bullshit agenda.
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 01:05 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;12679 wrote:
It means a lot. It basically means the Democrats, they who will be in charge of America in the coming years, don't recognize any war on terrorism. They're redefining the conflict. They're essentially withdrawing from it on a global scale, and focusing on Iraq, where their main concern is withdrawal. It sucks. Democrats are WEAK. They represent, celebrate and perpetuate in America, WEAKNESS. They all need to see and absorb the lessons of "300".:headbang:


The lessons of the "300?" You mean that a small, committed group of
patriots and insurgents can stand up to a superior numbered invading force?

You're weak between the ears.
0 Replies
 
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 01:13 pm
@Silverchild79,


#1, FOX News exists just to get people with your views rev'ed up, and they
never fail.

#2, "War on Terror" is a laughably bad concept. War on an emotion and
response? I understand the futility of discussing semantics with people who
don't know what semantics are, but "War on Terrorism" would be more fitting.
Except, wait, we support terrorist ourselves, and always have:

http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/04/18/report_us_backs_militant_kurdish_group/

but we have a habit of betraying who we use to do our dirty work:

http://www.cato.org/dailys/02-26-99.html

So, we pay the consequences, which is how Al Qaeda came into being in the
first place.

Black and White (and Red White and Blue) judgements on this stuff don't
work.

We've very actively created the mess we have to deal with in the world,
and we still don't understand how we screw things up.
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 02:01 pm
@oleo,
oleo;15536 wrote:
#1, FOX News exists just to get people with your views rev'ed up, and they
never fail.

#2, "War on Terror" is a laughably bad concept. War on an emotion and
response? I understand the futility of discussing semantics with people who
don't know what semantics are, but "War on Terrorism" would be more fitting.
Except, wait, we support terrorist ourselves, and always have:

United Press International - NewsTrack - Top News - Report: U.S. backs militant Kurdish group

but we have a habit of betraying who we use to do our dirty work:

The United States as Global Cop: Arresting Consequences

So, we pay the consequences, which is how Al Qaeda came into being in the
first place.

Black and White (and Red White and Blue) judgements on this stuff don't
work.

We've very actively created the mess we have to deal with in the world,
and we still don't understand how we screw things up.


I think you forgot #3, "The preceding is a paid propaganda tirade funded by the DNC, MSNBC, and George Soros. Talking points written by Howard Dean. All rights reserved."
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 02:02 pm
@I Understand,
Quote:
Listen, I am 22 years old. My parents barely make $40,000 a year together in one of the most expensive states to live in. I almost make double what they make combined in a year and I got it for myself. I was raised basically to get everything myself. I have lived in predominately black neighborhoods and the "ghettos". I am not sheltered.


I see where you're comin' from, brotha. It's hard out there for a lib.
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 02:46 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;15539 wrote:
I think you forgot #3, "The preceding is a paid propaganda tirade funded by the DNC, MSNBC, and George Soros. Talking points written by Howard Dean. All rights reserved."


It's not my fault that they're a lot more on target regarding the truth than the
other side.
0 Replies
 
I Understand
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 02:55 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;15540 wrote:
I see where you're comin' from, brotha. It's hard out there for a lib.


Good ol' sarcasm. Have you lived in poverty before? It is one of the most miserable things there is and I feel for the people that are suffering. When you are sick and cannot go to the doctor. You see how you feel. I have compassion. I am not selfish and self-centered. I want change for these people. But of course thats the way capitalism works, you need people to suffer at the low- tier jobs all of there lives to benefit yourself.
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 04:12 pm
@Silverchild79,
We have a system in which it is possible to get a thing called a job and with hard work it is quite possible to get a better one if yours is crappy, and if too many do this, we don't pull them back, we just fill the gap with illegal immigrants.

Anyway, I was referring to the fact that you seem to tout your hardships as some sort of thing that makes you better in the debate. Would you like an award? It really doesn't matter.

Anyway, even the poor in America are about 100x better off than most in Africa and a lot in the Middle East and Asia, probably most there too. And of course, Latin America.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 04:17 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;15550 wrote:
We have a system in which it is possible to get a thing called a job and with hard work it is quite possible to get a better one if yours is crappy, and if too many do this, we don't pull them back, we just fill the gap with illegal immigrants.

Anyway, I was referring to the fact that you seem to tout your hardships as some sort of thing that makes you better in the debate. Would you like an award? It really doesn't matter.

Anyway, even the poor in America are about 100x better off than most in Africa and a lot in the Middle East and Asia, probably most there too. And of course, Latin America.


So that would be a no.
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 04:21 pm
@Silverchild79,
No to having lived in poverty? Sure.
0 Replies
 
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 04:35 pm
@Silverchild79,
Didn't think so.

Trapped referenced I Understand as a rich kid and that being the explaination of his liberal views, hence he retorted with the fact that he isn't. Hardly touting ones hardships to win a debate.

Trapped
Quote:
I would strongly consider myself "countryfolk". And besides that, i see alot more trust fund babies who went to private schools on the lib side anyways. That my friend is sheltered. The fantasy world you people live in is repulsive.


I understand
Quote:
Listen, I am 22 years old. My parents barely make $40,000 a year together in one of the most expensive states to live in. I almost make double what they make combined in a year and I got it for myself. I was raised basically to get everything myself. I have lived in predominately black neighborhoods and the "ghettos". I am not sheltered. Anyone that follows scientific reports knows that the polar ice caps are melting at a very fast rate. I don't mean the scientific reports funded by Exxon-Mobil either. All the data points towards carbon emissions having a role on speeding up this process. The Earth may be in a period of climate change ,but our carbon loving society is speeding up the process in which millions of lives could be lost due to the sea levels raising 50 ft. Thats the smart thing to do my friend. Funding a "war on terror" which the US will never win is not an intelligent thing to do. We keep losing more and more of our soldiers to a bull**** agenda.


Maybe "those people" would have been a better phrase than "you people".
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 05:26 pm
@Silverchild79,
Yep throw millions of tax payer dollars at stopping global warming, global warming can't be stopped because Earth is aging like it's population. The left thinks it's a nobel cause thus so shall the rest of society or they will start screaming.

I've noticed that it's okay to demean Christians, but hell has no fury than the left if you mention Radical Islam. Honestly this group of spineless wankers would gladly hand over their country "Lest they offend". Offend, they don't mind offending me with their verbal clap trap and snotting and bawling. Opps sorry off topic.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 05:36 pm
@Silverchild79,
"You're weak between the ears."

I will mash your bag, Lips.
0 Replies
 
I Understand
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 05:43 pm
@Red cv,
Red;15562 wrote:
Yep throw millions of tax payer dollars at stopping global warming, global warming can't be stopped because Earth is aging like it's population. The left thinks it's a nobel cause thus so shall the rest of society or they will start screaming.

I've noticed that it's okay to demean Christians, but hell has no fury than the left if you mention Radical Islam. Honestly this group of spineless wankers would gladly hand over their country "Lest they offend". Offend, they don't mind offending me with their verbal clap trap and snotting and bawling. Opps sorry off topic.



Of course I demean radical Islam. They want to usher in armegeddon. So do the Radical Christians. I am an optimist. Global warming has been accelerated by carbon emissions like the data tells us. If we can slow down that acceleration we can buy ourselves some hope that science can progress us to find another world or fix the global warming problem scientifically.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 05:55 pm
@Drnaline,
Don't demean them, dammit. Blow them up.:beat:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/08/2025 at 05:59:55