If only Clinton had been a Republican

How did you come to that conclusion?

I'll need something a little more then hearsay or opinion.

You were fighting established countries. We are fighting terrorism globally. It is a never ending war that will continue to see money dumped into it.

Bad example.

You know... you're right. Clinton gave us an Exit Strategy to get out of Kosovo.


Bush didn't.

So you're saying that you would rather *not* fight a war on terrorism, just because it costs a lot of money?

We fought Germany, and Japan because they represented an ideal that was abhorant and evil in this world and should have been removed from the face of the Earth.

I'd say Global Terrorism is just as abhorrant and evil. It would be immoral to fight a war based soley on if the cost benefit analysis comes up roses.

Inflation do to the value of the dollar going down, the increase in the national debt. Budgets that call for more global spending. The realization that kids today will have no social security to leave off of.

I guess you are under the impression that the government can just create money when it needs it and there will be no negative effect.

What is Bush's exit strategy for Iraq? Do not see one. Please. Clinton sucked it up in his 8 years. I do not like Clinton. Stop telling me about Clinton. Bush is in office now and he is doing no better. We are stuck in Iraq with no progress being made toward getting our soldiers out.

I am saying that we can not fight Global Terrorism, Iraq and Iran at the same time and have just a damn peachy economy :no:

I'd like to have a dollar for every time someone defending Bush referred to Clinton as a defense.lol.

The only reason I brought that up was to point out that even though Clinton had an exit strategy, we are still in Kosovo.

You want me to stop talking about Clinton, yet the title of the thread has his name in it.... Go figure.

Apparently you haven't been reading the status reports coming out of Iraq.


January-April


Too Bad... you'd be more informed and wouldn't have to rely on talking points to make your case.

What is the point of debating what might have happened in 2004?

Does anybody here really think Kerry would have us in any better of a position than we are now?

So stop bitching about the past? :dunno:

I dunno, just a thought.

To defend Bush, would require that you mount a cogent argument, let alone an attack.

So far I haven't seen anything but for talking points and strawmen.


Perhaps if you tried a little harder, I might take you a little more seriously.

Of course it is left leaning. That is how you want it to be. While I never said they were accurate it is pretty common knowledge that people are tired of Bush and his Adminstration. You just do not care to accept it.

You were fighting established countries. We are fighting terrorism globally. It is a never ending war that will continue to see money dumped into it.

Bad example.

Hersay? Remember that big post you never responded to? Read it. Points out many instances of you turning around and finding a democrat that did the same thing if someone finds something wrong with Bush.

What is the point of debating what might have happened in 2004?

Does anybody here really think Kerry would have us in any better of a position than we are now?