1
   

Latinos divided on immigration issue

 
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:01 pm
@Lasombra,
Lasombra wrote:
How would you propose removing a population, roughly the size of Pennsylvania, out of the country?

Last time I checked, we had a problem evicting a lone, little Cuban boy. Imagine what kind of CF we'll get into when you multiply it 11 million times?


Also, while you're deporting these illegals, what do you do with those that have kids who were born here? Wouldn't you be deporting American citizens, who could be atleast 20 years old?

It's one thing to say GTFO, but it's another to actually do it. Nevermind the fact that the moment you say that you're going to evict everyone that you will turn the climate of the country to that of Poland in the late 30's; and last time I checked..that wasn't too friendly of a time.
Quote:
what do you do with those that have kids who were born here? Wouldn't you be deporting American citizens, who could be atleast 20 years old?

No, just because you were born here does not make you a citizen.
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:06 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
No, just because you were born here does not make you a citizen.


You might want to research that statement.Very Happy
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:07 pm
@ndjs,
ndjs wrote:
While I'd love to see them all gone, I know it's impossible. It would be pointless until the borders are secured anyways. Yeah, ok, so maybe you don't look brown. But I know plenty of hispanics who refer to themselves as brown, talk about brown pride, etc. I never said all of them do that, they don't. You won't find me making a generalization about races.

I know for a fact that many times illegals are discovered through traffic stops, warrants being served for others, etc. And you are right, police don't have jurisdiction. But they should either make the proper reports or be given jurisdiction to hold illegals until the proprer authorities can do something about it.

What does it say about our country's stance on illegal immigration if the police say, "Oh, you're illegal? Alright then, stay out of trouble. See ya."
Quote:
what do you do with those that have kids who were born here? Wouldn't you be deporting American citizens, who could be atleast 20 years old?

No comprende, you'll have to translate it to spanish please, LOL.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:07 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
tumbleweed wrote:
You might want to research that statement.Very Happy
I have. I stand by my statement.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:11 pm
@Lasombra,
Lasombra wrote:
That goes on all the time, but local authorities must respond to actual calls - not just do traffic stops on "brown" people to see if they're legal or illegal, as that would be unconstitutional.

It is only unconstitutional if you are a US citizen, you have no right if you are not.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:15 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
tumbleweed wrote:
Expand it? What good would that do? If they can't do their job now, how is making it even bigger going to solve the problem? They aren't using all the tools at their disposal.

Didn't Bush establish the DHS? Isn't the DHS responsible for border security?
Neither one seems very effective.
I think you keep getting Fema and DHS mixed up. They are separate entity's. They are very effective for what they have to work with. No new attacks speaks for itself.
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:23 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
I think you keep getting Fema and DHS mixed up. They are separate entity's. They are very effective for what they have to work with. No new attacks speaks for itself.

No new attacks does nothing to speak for itself. You exclude the possibility that now instead of killing our citizens they are going to Iraq and killing our military men and women and citizens of that country.
0 Replies
 
Lasombra
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:31 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
tumbleweed wrote:
Expand it? What good would that do? If they can't do their job now, how is making it even bigger going to solve the problem? They aren't using all the tools at their disposal.

Didn't Bush establish the DHS? Isn't the DHS responsible for border security?
Neither one seems very effective.



By expanding it, I mean using the technology that we have been using in the WOT.

  • Let's tap the phones of Coyotes
  • Let's use UAVs to monitor the border. The trial programs in Idaho worked quite well nabbing drug smugglers
  • Let's hire more border patrol agents
  • Let's "embed" BP officers with teams of Minutemen


Yes President Bush established the Department of Homeland Security, however it isn't a new entity, rather an amalgam of existing agencies (Border Patrol, ICE, parts fo the Coast Guard, parts of the FBI etc...) and I'd say that we as a whole haven't been effective with Border Security no matter who the President. Nice Strawman though Wink
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:34 pm
@Curmudgeon,
Quote:
Let's hire more border patrol agents

Put the military on the borders.
Lasombra
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:34 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
No, just because you were born here does not make you a citizen.



Apparently you haven't heard of the 14th Amendment?


it's been around for a bit... almost 140 years
Lasombra
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:36 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
About as much as being hispanic does to this immigration problem. I appears to me they make it an issue about there heritage, i see no problem with ndjs being proud of his.



Well.. we don't *all* do it, but I'll grant you that vocal minorities have a penchant to do it.... just like the Black Panthers or the Klan.

I don't have a problem with anyone taking pride in their heritage.
0 Replies
 
Lasombra
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:41 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
It is only unconstitutional if you are a US citizen, you have no right if you are not.



Actually, if you are a foreign national, you have many rights here in the US, including:
  • Your Right to Refuse Entry Into Your Home
  • Your Right to Remain Silent
  • Your Rights if You are Arrested
  • Your Right to Refuse to Sign Any Document
  • Your Right to Send Your Children to Public Schools
  • Your Right to Medical Treatment
0 Replies
 
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:42 pm
@Lasombra,
Lasombra wrote:
Apparently you haven't heard of the 14th Amendment?


it's been around for a bit... almost 140 years

Quote:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


For reference
0 Replies
 
Lasombra
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:43 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent wrote:
I never said pull anyone over because they might be illegal. I said when someone is pulled over for a routine traffic stop and it turns out they do not have a license because they are illegal.. the higher authority should be notified.


Generally, state and local police officers do not have the power to arrest you for violating immigration laws. The enforcement of immigration laws is generally left to ICE. However, some state laws grant local police the authority to arrest persons who violate federal criminal laws, including criminal immigration statutes. In addition, a 1986 federal statute includes a requirement that state law enforcement officials notify ICE when they arrest any individual suspected of being an undocumented alien on drug charges.
An ICE officer is allowed to arrest you without a warrant if he believes that you are in the United States illegally and has reason to believe that you are likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for your arrest. If ICE arrests you without a warrant, they must give you a form informing you of your rights. The form must note that you are allowed to speak with an attorney or other representative. ICE must give you a list of attorneys who will provide you with free legal services in the event that you cannot afford to pay for the services of a private attorney. If you ask to speak to an attorney, ICE must give you access to a telephone and at least two hours to try to call an attorney. During that time, ICE may not interrogate you, other than to obtain basic biographical information.
0 Replies
 
Lasombra
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:49 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent wrote:
Put the military on the borders.



This was done in the 90's by the then President Clinton IIRC. Public opinion weend after some confrontations between soldiers and illegals.


Personally, I don't think it's a good idea to put soldiers on the border. Soldiers are used to fight wars. Federal cops are a better weapon.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:53 pm
@Lasombra,
Lasombra wrote:
Apparently you haven't heard of the 14th Amendment?


it's been around for a bit... almost 140 years
If you hold citizenship in another country and are visiting the US, legal or none legal you are not a citizen of this country.
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 05:54 pm
@Lasombra,
Lasombra wrote:
This was done in the 90's by the then President Clinton IIRC. Public opinion weend after some confrontations between soldiers and illegals.


Personally, I don't think it's a good idea to put soldiers on the border. Soldiers are used to fight wars. Federal cops are a better weapon.

Federal cops arent stopping 2 million people from getting in America illegaly. You want it to stop or not? Put the military on the border.
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 06:06 pm
@Lasombra,
Lasombra wrote:
By expanding it, I mean using the technology that we have been using in the WOT.

  • Let's tap the phones of Coyotes
  • Let's use UAVs to monitor the border. The trial programs in Idaho worked quite well nabbing drug smugglers
  • Let's hire more border patrol agents
  • Let's "embed" BP officers with teams of Minutemen


Yes President Bush established the Department of Homeland Security, however it isn't a new entity, rather an amalgam of existing agencies (Border Patrol, ICE, parts fo the Coast Guard, parts of the FBI etc...) and I'd say that we as a whole haven't been effective with Border Security no matter who the President. Nice Strawman though Wink


What do you mean strawman? lol.

Say what you want, Bush created a branch of government that is a flop.It can't even carry out policies it was formed to enforce.
0 Replies
 
Lasombra
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 06:11 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
If you hold citizenship in another country and are visiting the US, legal or none legal you are not a citizen of this country.



I didn't say that.


Again, here's what you said:
Drnaline wrote:

No, just because you were born here does not make you a citizen.


You are saying that it doesn't matter if you are born here to determine your citizenship.

I am saying that being born here is all you need to be a citizen - no matter who your parents are.

I have the US Constitution on my side, and you have .... nothing.


I am right, you are wrong.


Thank you, please drive through. Wink
0 Replies
 
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2006 06:12 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
I have. I stand by my statement.



Birth within the United States
Children born in the United States (including, in most cases, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Panama Canal Zone before it was returned to Panama), are U.S. citizens at birth (unless born to foreign diplomatic staff), regardless of the citizenship or nationality of the parents (see Jus soli). This has become controversal, as many Mexican parents will cross the border into the United States to give birth, so that their children will be U.S. citizens. A birth certificate is considered evidence of citizenship
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 12:47:40