61
   

The Confederacy was About Slavery

 
 
Ionus
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 05:13 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
"If I cant win the argument, it must be because my opponent is racist"
Hahahaha !! Thanks for a good laugh...as usual at your expense ...."If I cant win an argument, it must be because my opponent is Australian"

Most racists are delicate with a chip on their shoulder....anal retentive types.....just like you.....and you argue you cant be a racist despite the evidence because you don't want to be thought of badly ? You should have thought of that a long time ago .
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 05:21 pm
@Ionus,
good attempt at shifting the issue. Kinda stupid, but nice try.

ANUS must seek a new brain cause the one hes got aint working too well.
Ionus
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 05:24 pm
@farmerman,
So why is it if you shift the issue you are not running scared ?

Gomer the Turd must seek help .
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 05:26 pm
@Ionus,
I havent shifted anything ANUS, are you on more unfriendly drugs tonite?

ANUS must seek a new brain...yadda yadda.
Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 05:40 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
I havent shifted anything
Why do you think your stupidity is not obvious to others ? You think all you have to do is have a comeback and your fans...sorry fan....will believe you . That you can sprout such bullshit and think you are doing well says you have a lot of disorder in your personality . There is a way you can get help and improve your life.....you are not well .

Gomer the Turd must seek help .
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 05:45 pm
@Ionus,
Its quite reasonable for you to go through these seratim clips of others posts, never add anything but sicko one line ad hominems and then claim that its your opponent whose argument is weak. Ive presented several lines of strong evidence, and several others has done so also. Even hawkeye actually had a post that supports the title of this thread.
I really dont know how your stupid head works and , plese, dont tell me cause I just ate supper.

ANUS must get a new brain cause the one he has aint working at all.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 05:46 pm
@farmerman,
NIGHTY NIGHT ANUS, youre getting to be a big bore and Im just feeding you.
Ionus
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 05:58 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
Ive presented several lines of strong evidence,
Not in this thread . You have presented what every white boy is taught to white wash the Civil War...it wasn't about power, us whites killed almost as many of us as all the other wars into this century put together.....and why did the whites kill so many of each other ? To free the black man from slavery.... Very Happy ...shaw 'nuf !

When I pointed out England had banned slavery of Englishmen almost a thousand years ago as an aside you jumped on it thinking you could avenge all those times you were wrong and humiliated . And **** for brains thought he smelt blood too and claimed it wasnt 1,000 years ago...OK, it was actually 945 by one estimate and 909 by another.....but the point is sound . Slavery was outlawed in England a long time ago . You could have been discussing what that meant for later laws, but you were too busy drinking and abusing...then you had to gall to suggest the problem was not you and **** for brains but my nationality ! You would have made a swell plantation owner with your personality defects and stupid arrogance .

Gomer the Turd must seek help .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 05:59 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
NIGHTY NIGHT ANUS
Awww.....what a nice man......nighty night Gomer...kiss kiss

Gomer the Turd must seek help .
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 10:31 pm
@Ionus,
Poor Law from 1547, by Edward VI : "persistent slavery" as the punishment for "vagabonds".
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 10:39 pm
@Ionus,
Those black slaves were English "subjects", yes.
Setanta
 
  0  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 03:09 am
@mysteryman,
Thanks, Boss. I'm almost ashamed to admit that i like them (almost, but not quite). It's really bad as a depiction of probable prehistory, but i like a good story well told, and she provides that despite the BS.

Again, thanks for the notice.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 03:15 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Poor Law from 1547, by Edward VI : "persistent slavery" as the punishment for "vagabonds".
Reference ??? Did you translate it from the Latin or from German ?
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 03:15 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Those black slaves were English "subjects", yes.
Bet you they werent . Reference ?
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 03:18 am
@Setanta,
Is she the one that wrote those "Clan of the CAve BEar" Books?
Setanta
 
  0  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 03:26 am
@farmerman,
Yeah, and in many respects they suck--but she's a good story-teller, and i'm a sucker for that.
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 03:36 am
@Setanta,
I remember when the frst book came out, I didnt know anybody whod read it. SO< I went to see the mnovie with Darryl Hqnnaqh. She was hot but the movie was a slow motion train wreck as I recall.
I liked the movie'The Search For Fire" with one of the Zappa Girls ('moon unit or some name like that).
Setanta
 
  0  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 03:48 am
@farmerman,
Yeah, Quest for Fire was very entertaining (French-Canadian, the original title was La Guerre de feu). Clan of the Cave Bear[/i'] sucked, but it got better. I never saw the motion picture.
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 04:03 am
@Setanta,
The thing I hated the most was the pompous creation of a "Neanderthal sign language" and complete with subtitles I hate subtitles cause you miss the movie.
I just went and reqad that the book author sued the movie company for 40million for ******* up her book. MAybe if I can find an MP3 or CD audio book. Ive got too much other **** to read now.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  0  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 04:10 am
I wouldn't recommend making a very great effort to read her books. I've read them all (except this newst one), but i've never actually purchased one. She seems to have been seduced by the common image of a neanderthal as a hulking brute. This came from the original individual who was found in Germany in the 19th century. Modern researchers quickly identified him as a man in his 40s suffering from crippling arthritis. Artists continue to portray neanderthals with a jutting jaw and sloping forehead, mouth slightly agape, which is at odds with the image produced by specialists who reconstruct faces from the skull. For example, the archaeological evidence is that neanderthals were using iron pyrite with flints to start fires thousands of years before there is any evidence of early modern man doing the same. I think Auel is a not-so-gifted amateur who only began to see that she needed to do careful research after the second book--the third book shows some sign that she got expert advice for the first time in her series.
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 04:46:28