May I see your papers, citizen?

@ABE5177,

ABE5177 wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
He (Holder) said, when asked if he thought the law was constitutional, "I haven't been briefed yet".

That was just after he admitted he had not read the bill....

what daya expect if brown is th n nw black like illegals say??

holdr is the oldblack, screw him and his boss abnd th horses thery rode in on

hey, the only incoherent ones here are the racists like brownie and his illegal ilk

gotta have someone to spell check posts, just got one

so what i said was

"brown is the new black" that's a dictum from a girls's rag called vogue, they weren't talking about niggers either or illegal hispanics just clothes

holder and his boss are welcome to go back to the hovels their daddies came from today i got my new bumper sticker

"A Village in Kenya is Missing its Idiot"
so take that and shove it, maybe the lot of them should be deported black and brown

did my explanation help your understanding????

0 Replies

@ghostinthemachine702,

I understand ABE perfectly well.

0 Replies

@ebrown p,

ebrown p wrote:

(For the record, I read the racist bill before it was signed)

Do tell... please list what you think is racist about this bill.

1 Reply

@H2O MAN,

Quote:

Do tell... please list what you think is racist about this bill.

Why? Didn't YOU read the bill?

3 Replies

@ebrown p,

ebrown p wrote:

Quote:

Do tell... please list what you think is racist about this bill.

Why? Didn't YOU read the bill?

You must have me confused with Eric Holder.

0 Replies

@ebrown p,

Quote:

Do tell... please list what you think is racist about this bill.

ebrown p wrote:

Why? Didn't YOU read the bill?

Its a reasonable request, Mr. Brown,
asking u to point out the specific words to which u object.

David

0 Replies

I saw a report last night on Fox News that a number of states were going to punish Arizona with some sort of trade sanctions and that a number of others were thinking of bringing in similar legislation to what Arizona has done.

Was it true?

1 Reply

@spendius,

New Mexico is thinking about relocating so they don't have to share a state line with the hateful Arizona.

That's what I read.

On my iPod. Or X-Box.

"Information can be a distraction".

Or something.

1 Reply

@Irishk,

That's very true.

0 Replies

Quote:

Should the federal government challenge Arizona's immigration law in court?

No 63% 59478

Yes 37% 34563

Consistent with the other evidence that the Arizona law is supported by Americans.

0 Replies

@H2O MAN,

H2O MAN wrote:

It's a BIG DEAL and it reveals a pattern of arrogant incompetence
that permeates the entire Obama administration top-to-bottom.

His staff has not yet provided him with the Readers Digest condensed
version, but he continues to talk **** about the new law for the press.

You got nothing!

Once again, you proudly prove your ignorance. Unless one is preparing an analysis, one does not sit down and read raw legislation. It mostly consists of provisions in other law incorporated by reference. An executive would rely on a staffer's analysis. I realize this is hard for you to understand, since you are a person whose writing is comparable to that in bumper stickers.

1 Reply

@Advocate,

You proudly wear your ignorance on your sleeve.

You are a fool if you think the Obama administration (the bumper sticker slogan administration) has a clue.

0 Replies

I am so tired of those contributors to this forum who haven't a clue as to what a Nazi or a Fascist or a Communist or a communist is . . . and, apparently, comedian Lewis Black has the same problem when it comes to glenn beck.

The AZ situation triggers this funny response:

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/05/13/lewis_black_glenn_beck_nazis/index.html

0 Replies

@ebrown p,

ebrown p wrote:

Quote:

Do tell... please list what you think is racist about this bill.

Why? Didn't YOU read the bill?

Typical. You cannot answer.

2 Replies

@Brandon9000,

Typical that you fail to understand the difference between "did not" and "can not".

Also, this whole thread is dedicated to the racism inherent in this law, so all you have to do is read the effing thread.

1 Reply

@Brandon9000,

I was going to ask if you'd read the rest of the thread since we've had this discussion several times, but at 58 pages long, maybe it's just worth reiterating. This law is racist because it cannot be enforced without profiling and that profiling will clearly be based on skin color. As I see it, Arizona police have two options. First, they can ask every single person they stop for proof of citizenship and take everyone that cannot show it to the courthouse pending proof of citizenship. Of course since Americans do not have to carry proof of citizenship around with them, so a decent number of citizens will be carted off to jail under this scenario, so this isn't going to happen. The second option is to just go after people with brown skin. This means that American citizens with brown skin will be frequently stopped while those with other color skin will go by unmolested. Don't think that Arizona police will harass citizens because of their skin color? It happened in Arizona earlier this year.

1 Reply

@DrewDad,

There is ZERO racism inherent in this law.

0 Replies

@engineer,

Is profiling bad, or unavoidable? when the cop on the street decides who to look at he in part depends upon his knowledge of who the bad guys tend to be, and on his instincts which are honed by experience and are in part irrational.

I think this call to void all profiling is impossible, and is part of an organized and ignoble effort to void humanity...to live in a fantasy world.

we have real problems, we need realistic and effective solutions. all of this theory about how such and such is "bad' simply because our concepts do not mesh with human reality is not much use. the correct response to this cry of foul for profiling is "it is time for the adults to take over, please grow up and join us".

3 Replies

@hawkeye10,

But where would you find them hawk and what would they do?

The nature of power is such that even if you did find them they would quickly become the same as those they replaced. Donald Duck and Albert Einstein would behave just the same on a hot tin roof or in a pit of poisonous snakes.

1 Reply

@spendius,

Quote:

But where would you find them hawk and what would they do?

find who, reasonable and educated people who can both figure out what the problems we face are and come up with reasonable ideas for solutions that might work?

humanity has been able to reach this level of effectiveness on a regular basis, I think we can do it again.

1 Reply

May I see your papers, citizen?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know