@Merry Andrew,
Merry: Right you are, Set. I hesitated before upper-casing 'viking' in the headline. But concession to accepted useage won out.
Merry: In other words, you're wrong but I'll allow that you're right, Setanta.
=======================
jtt: Merry Merry, that's likely to get you booted out of your prescriptivist club.
I'm puzzled. How might Setanta be "right"?
No rancor.
======================
Merry:
1. I wasn't aware of being a member of any such "prescriptivist" club.
2. Setanta is correct in stating that the word 'viking' is properly not a noun but a verb. These people didn't call themselves Vikings. They were Scandinavian farmers of old who, in their spare time, went a-viking to supplement their income by either raiding or trading.
Merry: I'm not a prescriptivist but here's my prescription as regards this issue.
=======================
jtt: How could you even consider writing 2 after you wrote 1, Merry?
For a moment I thought you had an actual reason for suggesting that Setanta was "right".
Still no rancor, though certainly a large measure of surprise, bordering on shock.
======================
jtt: [
to plainoldme]
It doesn't matter what the origin of a word is
===========================
Merry Andrew: What a classic JTT bullshit statement! Priceless.
No explanation at all from Merry, even to his latest posting. And after this, Merry old Andrew tries to pull that "Oh I have such a hard time not retaliating, Mame, I must try to be a better person".
So, in your second posting, Merry, you tell Setanta he's right, then you tell him he's wrong then when asked to clear up the confusion, you cut and run.
And what's worst of all, you make out like you're the poor little put upon one. Been taking lessons from the grand master, Setanta?