@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:This profile fits with a lot if people.
It fits with people who have police beat confessions out of them.
ossobuco wrote:She got advice, if even from herself.
Her story was completely consistent both before and after that interrogation session. The only time it changed is when the Italians were hitting her.
And there was another question I asked there:
If the police only went after that guy because they were being misled, why did they completely ignore her retraction and keep going after him?
I believe OCCOM BILL pointed out to you a few pages back that these statements were quite clearly coerced. You sort of dodged the point by acting like he was saying we should make Miranda legally binding on other governments, but the fact remains that it is utterly preposterous to blame Amanda for anything she said in that statement.
And that interrogation is not the only place where the facts completely support Amanda and completely contradict the Italians, either.
Every bit of the evidence the Italians pretended they had against Amanda turned out to be completely fabricated.
For instance, their claim that the breakin was staged "because there was broken glass on clothes" is quite clearly refuted by the actual pictures from the crime scene, which clearly show that there was not a bit of broken glass on clothes.
And let's not forget the fictitious bleach purchase receipts they told everyone they had.
ossobuco wrote:I remain not knowing what happened,
That is a preposterous position to take considering all the evidence.
There is ZERO evidence that Knox (or her boyfriend) had anything to do with this crime.
Guede, and only Guede, left his DNA on the victim.
Guede, and only Guede, left his DNA in the victim.
Guede, and only Guede, left his fingerprints at the murder site (and in the victim's blood no less).
Guede, and only Guede, has a history of committing breakins *identical* to the breakin that happened here (and he has a history of carrying a large knife during his breakins as well).
ossobuco wrote:and despite your wailing, I don't think you do either.
No. The evidence allows me to know exactly what happened.
Guede broke in through the window, alone, while carrying a large knife (just like he has done many times before), and then he killed Kercher with his knife.
ossobuco wrote:I think arrogance in this matter by any country is not applied well.
What you see in me is not arrogance, but a very large amount of completely justified anger.