22
   

School bans word - "meep"

 
 
Merry Andrew
 
  2  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 01:29 am
@jjorge,
You should get in on the act, jjorge. The tsar has provided the e-mail addresses.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 02:22 am
@Linkat,
I'd almost like to ban the word 'like' when it's used thusly:

'And like I told her, like I'm not going to her party because like she didn't invite like any of my really good friends and like I don't know like any of the people she DID invite and like I'm just not interested.'

I'm like ( Laughing ), NOT exaggerating....this is part of an actual conversation between my daughter and her friend (thank god it was the friend who was speaking - I just turned up my ipod so I could refrain from asking her to please, please, PLEASE stop saying, 'like' (which I do ask my daughter and son to try to be cognizant of all the time- but I have the right to do that - they're my own kids).
jjorge
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 07:37 am
@aidan,
maybe they can be encouraged to substitute 'meep' for like.

it would come out like this:

"...And meep, I told her, meep I'm not going to the party because meep she didn't invite meep any of my really good friends and meep I don't know meep any of the people she DID invite and meep I'm just not interested..."
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 08:49 am

Is suspending a kid from school
(who only attends because of the compulsory education law)
like the OPPOSITE of what the truant officer did ??
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 08:59 am
@Linkat,
Linkat wrote:

What is "meep" -- apparently started with the 1980s Muppet character Beaker and is causing a lot of teeth-gnashing for adults at one Massachusetts high school. They have gone so far as to threaten suspension for students caught meeping.

The Prinicpal of this school sent automated calls to parents, warning them of the possible punishment after administrators learned that students were conspiring online to mass-meep.


There is strength in numbers.
What wud happen in the event of a mass meep
by the entire, unified student body, in an effort to control their own school ?





David
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 09:33 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:


There is strength in numbers.
What wud happen in the event of a mass meep
by the entire, unified student body, in an effort to control their own school ?


The Authorities could easily control this insubordination.

You don't have to suspend everyone... you just pick out a few "leaders" to make examples of. You make sure they understand that this will go on their record and that their grades will suffer (i.e. their future employment picture will be affected).

Another option would be to simply close the school for a couple of days... days that will, by law, need to be made up during the summer (the problem with this is that it punishes the teachers as well).

But the real goal is to turn student against student... by singling out a small few and then making the rest of the student body understand that any adverse consequences are the fault of these instigator... these young minds can easily by put back on the right path.

OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 10:39 am
@ebrown p,
David wrote:


There is strength in numbers.
What wud happen in the event of a mass meep
by the entire, unified student body, in an effort to control their own school ?


ebrown p wrote:
The Authorities could easily control this insubordination.
Government shoud be subordinated to its masters: the citizens.

As citizens, it behooves us to keep our lowlife hireling
in its proper place, always reminding it of its inferiority to us.
History has proven too well that when our hireling gets out of hand
there 's hell to pay for its employers, the citizens.







ebrown p wrote:
You don't have to suspend everyone... you just pick out a few "leaders" to make examples of.
Then, it will have behooven the students to have chosen replacements; a first VP,
a second VP, etc. to defeat the collective.




ebrown p wrote:
You make sure they understand that this will go on their record and that their grades will suffer
(i.e. their future employment picture will be affected).
I see your point:
so there shud be patriotic employers who will be CONSPICUOUS
about hiring the freedom fighters, recognizing their leadership potential, with decent salaries.
If their grades suffer in retribution, then that is corruption -- cheating -- by the teachers,
in that the grades are administered for issues unrelated to the coursework,
whose learning the grades purport to reflect.
Thay shoud be held to account; maybe their teaching licenses
shoud be suspended.
Good thinking, Mr. Brown.






ebrown p wrote:
Another option would be to simply close the school for a couple of days... days that will, by law,
need to be made up during the summer (the problem with this is that it punishes the teachers as well).
Well, the students can repeat the beginning of the cycle again, or simply not arrive in the summer.
So long as thay act in unison, thay shoud be safe.







ebrown p wrote:
But the real goal is to turn student against student... by singling
out a small few and then making the rest of the student body
understand that any adverse consequences are the fault of these
instigator... these young minds can easily by put back on the right path.
In other words: u say that their bravery may be tested.
I have confidence that thay will come thru as true Americans,
triumphing over the collective.
I am put in mind of the successful Romanian Revolution in December of 1989.

Of course, we expect it to be peaceful.

If the first effort does not succeed,
thay can persist until thay do. With practice, their organizational structure shud improve, as thay learn from their mistakes.
As their efforts become more successful
presumably the authoritarians will put up the White Flag
and beg to negotiate.





David
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 05:54 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
No David... you don't understand.

The schools first priority is ORDER-- there can be no education with chaos. This is why the school has POWER over the students.

Retribution (through grades or future record) is not "cheating"... this is the primary power that the school (seeing as schools do not have tanks or the power to throw the students in jail).

The school authority best serves the students by imposing rules and restrictions which must be obeyed. This is why it is imperative that such acts of defiance are dealt with most severely as a deterrence so that this defiance will not happen in the future.

If such insubordination; such disrespect for authority; such flouting of the social norms are tolerated, how will these students ever learn to be good law-abiding citizens.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 06:44 pm
@ebrown p,
Quote:
The schools first priority is ORDER


No. In a military prep school order should be around 13th on the priority list, in a public school somewhere around the high 20's.
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  2  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 06:50 pm
A schools first priority is to educate. This is an example of stupidity, but by deflection should teach the students something. I'm not really sure it needed learning, but the students will invariably come up against idiocy throughout there lives, better to learn the lesson when they're young, I guess.
jjorge
 
  4  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 07:35 pm
@Ceili,
When I quit school to join the Marines at seventeen, one of my favorite teachers (who liked me even though I was a smart-ass) said to me, "The hardest thing for you is going to be when you discover that you have to take orders from someone who is not as smart as you." She was right of course but one could make the argument that the worst teachers and school administrators fall into the same category -- stupid but in charge.

The best teachers and administrators don't see school as a battle field or student silliness as a declaration of war.
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 07:37 pm
@jjorge,
Amen
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Nov, 2009 12:39 am
@jjorge,
Quote:
maybe they can be encouraged to substitute 'meep' for like.

it would come out like this:

"...And meep, I told her, meep I'm not going to the party because meep she didn't invite meep any of my really good friends and meep I don't know meep any of the people she DID invite and meep I'm just not interested..."
Laughing Laughing

Yeah, and like , I could say 'meep' every time one of them says 'like' in the middle of a sentence where there's no simile to be found.

I think I'm gonna do that - next time I'm playing chauffeur and listening to the conversation from the back seat, when one them says something along the lines of, 'Geez, I'm like so hungry' I'm gonna go 'MEEP'! I'm gonna start doing that today and see what they do so if they say something else along the lines of, 'Like, I'd really like to...' I'll go 'MEEP'! and we'll just drive down the road saying 'like' and 'meep'.

But just for my own information - is 'meep' along the same lines as 'talk to the hand'?

When someone uses it are they implying that they don't have to listen to or pay attention to what someone else is saying because it's so vacuous?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Nov, 2009 03:07 am
@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:

No David... you don't understand.
I was having a little fun with u.
I am a reflexively anti-authoritarian person,
(except in a military context).



ebrown p wrote:
The schools first priority is ORDER-- there can be no education with chaos.
We must agree on that point.
That is not controversial.




ebrown p wrote:
This is why the school has POWER over the students.
There are major philosophical problems with that;
i.e., where did that power come from ?
Was it from the consent of the governed?
Hell, thay r even screwed out of their right to vote.
This "power" emulates n mimics slavery:
forced labor, against the will of the laborer,
in exchange for no pay. BIG PROBLEMS.
Obviously, I know the counterarguments in efforts to justify.
I was in the system long enuf to take a doctorate in jurisprudence.





ebrown p wrote:
Retribution (through grades or future record) is not "cheating"...
this is the primary power that the school
(seeing as schools do not have tanks or the power to throw the students in jail).
It is naked fraud, if a student is given a lower grade in geografy because he called the teacher a bum
or because he seduced the teacher 's wife.
The fact that, as u point out, the school cannot jail a student,
does not justify the school in telling lies about the student.
Grades are purportedly an accurate indication of how much
of the coursework the student learned.
If the school practices deception and mendacity about how much
he has learned as an act of vengeance for his arriving late or leaving early,
then the school is corrupt; the grades r unreliable.










ebrown p wrote:
The school authority best serves the students by imposing rules and restrictions which must be obeyed.
That word is hopelessly vague,
unless u mean that it is best for the extortionist
who is enacting these rules (with no moral authority to do so).
Of course, as we have agreed, it IS best to keep reasonable order.
That can be a problem, in keeping the prisoners there against their will.








ebrown p wrote:
This is why it is imperative that such acts of defiance are dealt
with most severely as a deterrence so that this defiance will not happen in the future.
Again, the natural American reflex
is to reject and overthrow such arbitrary control,
to which thay have never consented,
and for which thay are not paid.
Even military conscripts are paid.





ebrown p wrote:
If such insubordination; such disrespect for authority;
such flouting of the social norms are tolerated,
how will these students ever learn to be good law-abiding citizens.
Mr. Brown, u just jumped the track
and got derailed on your logic. What u propose is BRAINWASHING,
telling American citizens what to DO, as distinct from explaining the Pythagorean Theorum

U blythefully ASSUME that the school has "authority",
when that is as FAKE as a $7 bill. It has no legitimacy.
It is a naked Emperor.

As citizens, it is imperative that we never forget
that government is our lowlife hireling not our boss.
WE, our forefathers, created the damned thing to serve US,
not so that we coud serve IT.
To a government, the citizens are its Creators, its Gods,
who brought it into existence. Government is the little child of the citizen.
Holders of public office (of whom I was once one) must remember
who owes respect to whom. I propose the DIRECT OPPOSITE
of Hitler 's dictum:
"authority from the top down, obedience from the bottom up."

Schools certainly were never granted any authority by anyone
to teach the students to be "good citizens" (whatever the hell THAT means) nor to abide by the law.
That is not a function of education.
Indeed, the citizens may choose to throw out the law,
not to abide by it. This is supposed to be a free country,
which means that we keep government, and its representatives
in schools, on a short leash and in the words of Robert Heinlein,
keep it "weak, starved and inoffensive." (The Moon Is a Harsh MIstress)





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 15 Nov, 2009 03:18 am
@jjorge,
jjorge wrote:

When I quit school to join the Marines at seventeen, one of my favorite teachers (who liked me even though I was a smart-ass) said to me, "The hardest thing for you is going to be when you discover that you have to take orders from someone who is not as smart as you." She was right of course but one could make the argument that the worst teachers and school administrators fall into the same category -- stupid but in charge.

The best teachers and administrators don't see school as a battle field or student silliness as a declaration of war.
U put that very well indeed.
Cheney was and is much, much more intelligent than W.
I wish Cheney had been President instead of either of the Bushes.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Nov, 2009 03:26 am
@jjorge,
jjorge wrote:

When I quit school to join the Marines at seventeen, one of my favorite teachers (who liked me even though I was a smart-ass) said to me, "The hardest thing for you is going to be when you discover that you have to take orders from someone who is not as smart as you."
She was right of course but one could make the argument that the worst teachers and school administrators
fall into the same category -- stupid but in charge.

The best teachers and administrators don't see school as a battle field or student silliness as a declaration of war.
Not only stupid, but CRAZY:
in the second grade, I had a teacher named MIss Raid,
who several times every day, imitated an air raid siren.
She tightly closed her eyes, dropped down her jaw, all the way,
closed her fists and brought them up to chest level
and let out a scream lasting for between around 25 to 40 seconds.

In a typical day, she did that around 7 times.





jjorge
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Nov, 2009 06:38 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Miss Raid sounds like a real gem!
There are many good teachers, yet teaching is still not a field that the 'best and brightest' aspire to -- presumably due to the low status (despite all the palaver about the 'noble' teaching profession) and comparatively low pay.
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Nov, 2009 10:55 am
@jjorge,
Teaching is often what liberal arts majors go into as a default career. I took it up at the age of 57 mainly because at that age I couldn't find anything more lucrative that I'd be physically able to do.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  3  
Reply Sun 15 Nov, 2009 10:59 am
I'm glad the authorities have finally banned the disruptive use of the word meep. Obviously the students will never find a new word they can utter disruptively.
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Nov, 2009 12:37 pm
@Thomas,
How about...
bleep
cleep
fleep
gleep
kleep
neep
pleep
queep
treep
vleep
xeep
yeep
or zeep?
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 09:06:28