28
   

Now you are on my ignore list!

 
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 10:39 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

I MET a lot of those communist subversives
David


exactly how many did you meet? names/numbers? where did you meet them? why did you meet them?
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 01:09 pm
@ehBeth,
... and are you still a communist? How did you manage to dupe that mental giant, Joe McCarthy?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 01:23 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
I MET a lot of those communist subversives
David


exactly how many did you meet? names/numbers? where did you meet them? why did you meet them?


And exactly how did you know they were communist subversives?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 01:24 pm
@DrewDad,
Congratulations on more than one passage of lame humor . . . my hat is off to you (or would be, if i ever wore one).
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 01:27 pm
@Setanta,
Quote:
no amount of ranting by the gun nuts and the conservatives does any harm at all to my freedom . . .


... 'til you get plugged with one of the results of their ranting.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 05:10 pm
@panzade,
panzade wrote:

Quote:
I have now put genoves on my ignore list.


I would ask you to reconsider. If the folks who eventually revealed McCarthy's total disregard for the truth had put him on ignore, we'd be living in Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four Amerika


This has nothing to do with McCarthy. This has to do with the total idiot called genoves.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 05:55 pm
@panzade,
100% in agreement
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:01 pm
@ehBeth,
I'll have to scroll back, was it Set I agreed with? Yes, dammit.
My father was a victim of a McCarthy era foible writ large. You and I, ehBeth, break about the diff between maniacs in legal positions and bombastics online.

I want to sieve out the scrim. Engaging only raises and amuses them.

Which is a quandary for me with Omsig.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:01 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I MET a lot of those communist subversives
David


exactly how many did you meet?
names/numbers? where did you meet them?

why did you meet them?

I met them for purposes of countersubversion.
I worked for a joint project between the NY State Troopers
and the US House Committee on unAmerican Activities many decades ago.
Some of their meetings were public; hence, number estimates r impossible.





David
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:05 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Hiss.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:07 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:

Hiss.

Yeah; we got him.

I was not involved in that,
but we got him.





David
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:10 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Hah, I didn't think of that, good catch.

but I'm still hissing at you.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:12 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:

Hah, I didn't think of that, good catch.

but I'm still hissing at you.

OK; I 'll hafta get an endorsement on my insurance to cover that.
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:23 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
works up her bacteriological/virological spit.. well, I could do that, given that's a a field of my interest, but I dunno, it's interesting to see omsig as a product of those times, not that I didn't guess that, but it's more clear.
dyslexia
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:28 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

ossobuco wrote:

Hiss.

Yeah; we got him.

I was not involved in that,
but we got him.





David
so you must be in your 90's.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:36 pm
@ossobuco,
Possible but not sure.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:38 pm
@dyslexia,
He would have/could have been a hopeful or a recruit of some sort.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:51 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:

works up her bacteriological/virological spit.. well, I could do that, given that's a a field of my interest, but I dunno,
it's interesting to see omsig as a product of those times, not that I didn't guess that, but it's more clear.

I took Stalin, et seq. very seriously.
I believed that we were ultimately going to lose,
because of the feeble, tender-hearted opposition offered by liberals to communism.

In their quest to conquer the world,
the commies were practical; very much so.
Thay were very willing to be as evil as necessary to get the job done.

American liberals gave us little hope of a long-term successful resistance.
Some of the liberals with whom I discussed the situation
said that it woud not be bad if the commies won.
Some that I knew were heartbroken when thay collapsed in 1991.



David
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 06:58 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
I'm no fan of Stalin, good grief. Europeans and one particular australian think of me as near right wing. I don't really care how you took Stalin.
I care about the major hunt in the US, which was vile.

Oh, and I get ehBeth's rondelay of questions.
ebrown p
 
  4  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 09:58 pm
@ossobuco,
It seems to me that Joseph Stalin and Joseph McCarthy were the same kind of person using the same tactics to the same ends.

The only difference was that Stalin had much more success.
 

Related Topics

Lola at the Coffee House - Question by Lola
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Adding Tags to Threads - Discussion by Brandon9000
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Merry Andrew - Discussion by edgarblythe
Spot the April Fools gag yet? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Great New Look to A2K- Applause, Robert! - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Head count - Discussion by CalamityJane
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
The great migration - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 12:54:30