28
   

Now you are on my ignore list!

 
 
ebrown p
 
  2  
Reply Tue 23 Jun, 2009 05:05 pm
This thread is getting far too sappy and sentimental for my tastes.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Jun, 2009 05:09 pm
@Intrepid,
OK, that caused me to laugh..
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Jun, 2009 05:17 pm
@Robert Gentel,
I follow two "trivia/game" thread: the travel thread - "Where am I", and the Haiku thread. So I'd be a person left still thumbing down Lovatts forevermore, forevermore, in order to see those two I just noted. Wonder if there could be a workaround where someone like me could blank out most trivia/game/riddle threads. I can't guess if that could be easily worked out or difficult to devise..
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Jun, 2009 05:29 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
prob so
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Jun, 2009 05:53 pm
@chai2,
Set wants to know where you got that pic of me.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Jun, 2009 05:55 pm
@panzade,
panzade wrote:

I don't have anybody on ignore...I get a kick out of the lunatic fringe

I have gotten a kick out of the lunatic fringe too.

Call me a hypocrit, but I have dated a couple of commie chics (what the hell . . . )
and an uncle-in-law was a nazi. The FBI found a flag bearing a swastika
in his underwear drawer, during the Second World War.
He was not criminally prosecuted because he did not do anything unlawful.
He just had his opinions. He came from Germany during the 1920s.
With my family being of English derivation, he gloated over
the progress of the Second World War, at its beginning.
He used to taunt: "they are really giving it to the British, aren 't they ?"
referring to the bombing. We had some relatives remaining in England.
However, he tended to more pervasive silence toward the end of the war.
Anyway, on a personal basis, he was pleasant, intellectual,
and I enjoyed debating with him at family re-unions.
I argued for libertarian, laissez faire capitalism and Individualism.
He argued for collectivism, but he was polite and friendly;
to my mind, that is determinative as to whether a social relationship will endure.


I remember (at least) one guy on Abuzz who shared a lot of my political ideology,
but who polluted Abuzz continually with an unending succession of obscene language.
He was worthy of being put on Ignore, as were perverted leftists
who did the same thing. Leftists and Rightists were reciprocally
attributing various forms of sexual perversity to one another.
It was tiresome. I admit that u can get a kick out of the lunatic fringe.

My only criteria for being thrown in the Ignore Dungeon in this forum
are: (1) obscene, scatological language, and (2) incomprehensibility.
Some people are inarticulate; some are aliens unfamiliar with English.
If its too much work to figure out what someone has in mind,
I don 't wanna have to look at that. I don 't get paid for this.





David
chai2
 
  2  
Reply Tue 23 Jun, 2009 06:05 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

I don 't get paid for this.



TTH does.

Laughing
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 23 Jun, 2009 06:12 pm
@panzade,
panzade wrote:

prob so

I also get the impression that Chai
is more delightfully and delicately feminine than Veronica Hamel.



David

0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Jun, 2009 07:50 pm
I can handle weird and/or crazy. Gunga, for example, has never been on my ignore list.

Vulgar or constantly, deliberately disruptive gets on my ignore list.







David's marginal because of his font choices.... Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
chai2
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 04:46 am
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

Set wants to know where you got that pic of me.


Ha!
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 06:04 am
@chai2,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

I don 't get paid for this.


chai2 wrote:
Quote:
TTH does.

Laughing
How ?
TTH
 
  0  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 06:23 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I actually do get paid for being on the internet. This site pays me in satisfaction of humor and learning. It is the other site that pays me money. I signed a confidentiality agreement with the company years ago. In that agreement, I am not allowed to divulge what they show me or tell me and what I report back to them. Not even my husband knows. That is one agreement I refuse to break.
chai2
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 06:23 am
oh, there was a big thread she had in the past where she announced she was getting paid for posting on here (by some unnamed source), and "spying" on people.
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 06:24 am
@chai2,
Chai
Look up
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 06:43 am
@TTH,
TTH wrote:
Quote:
I actually do get paid for being on the internet.
This site pays me in satisfaction of humor and learning.

Agreed that it is sometimes humorous and educational.





TTH wrote:
Quote:
It is the other site that pays me money.

There are 2 sites ?



TTH wrote:
Quote:
I signed a confidentiality agreement with the company years ago.

Which company is this ?




TTH wrote:
Quote:

In that agreement, I am not allowed to divulge what they show me
or tell me and what I report back to them. Not even my husband knows.
That is one agreement I refuse to break.

Loyalty is good.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 06:45 am
@chai2,
chai2 wrote:
Quote:
oh, there was a big thread she had in the past where she
announced she was getting paid for posting on here
(by some unnamed source), and "spying" on people.

I used to spy on the communists a long time ago.





David
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 07:10 am
@OmSigDAVID,


Quote:
Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last, have you no sense of decency?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:58 am
@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO2iiovYq70[/youtube]

Quote:
Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last, have you no sense of decency?


The proponent of that question
was supporting the interests of those who woud enslave all Americans
along with the rest of the world. In the 3rd World War, he stood on the side of communist slavery.
I had the honor of having met, and briefly known Herbert Philbrick.
I never was so honored as to meet Senator Tailgunner Joe McCarthy.
His heart was in the right place; in my mind and in my heart, I embrace him.

When we nuked the Japs, our purpose was not to dump decency all over them.
Our purpose was war; it was to dump lethality & fatality upon them. It worked.
Until the end of the 3rd World War on Christmas Eve, 1991,
the communists were waging war against us.

To whatever extent Senator McCarthy had negative effect upon the communists,
he has my enduring gratitude. I wish that Senator McCarthy had been successful
in treating the commies more severely. Thay deserved it. The commies were worse than the nazis.

Long live Joe McCarthy in the love and high esteem of all good Americans !



David
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:02 am

Is that politically correct enuf for u ?
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:03 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Er....

The issue with McCarthy is not that he was a hard-liner against Communism.

The issue with McCarthy is that he was riding the wave of public fear, feeding that fear, in order to establish a power base. And the people that he persecuted were not revolutionaries.

McCarthy was just another demagogue.

Quote:
Main Entry: dem·a·gogue
1 : a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/demagogue
 

Related Topics

Lola at the Coffee House - Question by Lola
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Adding Tags to Threads - Discussion by Brandon9000
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Merry Andrew - Discussion by edgarblythe
Spot the April Fools gag yet? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Great New Look to A2K- Applause, Robert! - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Head count - Discussion by CalamityJane
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
The great migration - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 11:32:40