57
   

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Forums: Politics, Guns, Gun Control, U S Politics, American Conservatives
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2021 07:04 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
yOU CAN'T DO a drive-by knifing.

So what? Criminal gangs were still able to kill each other before cars and guns.


MontereyJack wrote:
You can't do a mass strangulation at a walmart.

So what? You can do a bombing, or drive a truck into a crowd at high speed.


MontereyJack wrote:
you can't do a road rage poisoning.

So what? You can still beat the other driver to death with your bare hands.


MontereyJack wrote:
Your argument is irrelevant, as always.

I do not agree with the frequent progressive contention that facts and reality are irrelevant.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2021 07:07 pm
@oralloy,
your "facts"aren't true. Your "reality" is really your illusion.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2021 07:09 pm
@oralloy,
so they're dead because they were shot, way too many times each year. that is the fact, that is the reality. it's the guns.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2021 07:11 pm
@MontereyJack,
They'd be just as dead if they were killed with some other weapon.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2021 07:12 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
your "facts"aren't true. Your "reality" is really your illusion.

Wrong. Facts are true by definition. Reality is not an illusion.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2021 07:15 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
You realize of course archie bunker is a laughingstock for his blatant prejudices and the lousy justifications for them

I do not share the progressive tendency to ridicule people who rely on facts and logic.


MontereyJack wrote:
so it's not surprising he makes the same stupid argument you've been pushing for years.. dumb when he makes it, dumber when you do it thirty years later.

I do not agree with the progressive contention that facts and logic are stupid.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 05:27 am
@oralloy,
what you call facts and logic are contrafactual and illogical. they are in reality not actual facts or logical reasoning. You spend far too much time in a videogame unikverse to recognize actual reality,
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 05:29 am
@MontereyJack,
Wrong again. My facts are real and my logic is sound. That why you've never been able to point out a single flaw in any of my arguments.
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 07:39 am
@oralloy,
Murder by defenestration is nowhere near as efficient as murder by firearm.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 07:40 am
@InfraBlue,
It is efficient enough to get the job done. The victim ends up being just as dead.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 08:03 am
@oralloy,
Your3 so called facts and logic are really neither as has been pointed out ro you repeatedly. If you deny it you are either lieing or the victim of selective awmnesia. Probably the former.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 08:37 am
@MontereyJack,
re oralloy:
I forgot to mention you could also be delusional. That is a strong contender.
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 09:30 am
@oralloy,
In terms of homicide rates, defenestration wouldn't be anywhere near as efficient as the use of firearms.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 03:15 pm
@InfraBlue,
That is incorrect. Statistics show very clearly that gun availability has little impact on homicide rates.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 03:17 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Your so called facts and logic are really neither as has been pointed out to you repeatedly.

Wrong again. My facts are all correct and my logic is impregnable. That is why you always fail to challenge anything that I say.


MontereyJack wrote:
If you deny it you are either lieing or the victim of selective amnesia. Probably the former.

Wrong again. What I'm doing is telling the truth.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 03:19 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
re oralloy:
I forgot to mention you could also be delusional. That is a strong contender.

Wrong again. It is you who is delusional. That is why I am always able to prove you wrong and you can never prove me wrong.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 03:44 pm
@oralloy,
Not incorrect. I didn't mention gun availability.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 04:12 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
Not incorrect.

That is incorrect. Statistics show very clearly that gun availability has little impact on homicide rates.


InfraBlue wrote:
I didn't mention gun availability.

That's OK. I mentioned it.
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 04:16 pm
@oralloy,
Not correct. You're confused.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2021 04:20 pm
@InfraBlue,
Nope. I am 100% correct. Statistics are very clear on the matter.

Gun availability has little impact on homicide rates.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Guns: how much longer will it take ....
  3. » Page 564
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.17 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 09:27:39
▲ ▼