@hawkeye10,
Quote:1. He overreached by including ineffective measures, such as a ban on military-style assault weapons. Opponents seized on those measures to doom the whole package of proposals.
Yes. Thanks again to all the extremists who vehemently insisted that every possible measure be tied to an unconstitutional ban on harmless cosmetic features.
We couldn't have defeated magazine limits without you.
Quote:4. The president imagines that the GOP is the opposition on gun-control policies, but his biggest problem is red-state Democrats who are convinced he offers them no political insulation from irate gun owners.
Some red-state Democrats ARE irate gun owners.
But yes, any politician whose district is a rural area needs to respect the will of the NRA.
Quote:10. There are a whole lot of law-abiding gun owners who don’t trust the government.
The last is perhaps the most important factor, too often ignored by the gun-averse media. The NRA succeeds because it has many, many members who feel strongly about the issue and see the ominous hands of government behind innocuous-sounding proposals (e.g. “background checks”). Just as liberals viscerally recoil from government regulation of marriage and abortion, conservatives do when it comes to guns.
Well, sort of.
But that makes it sound as if we "just believe that there must be something bad" in the proposals.
In reality we actually look at what is being proposed. We learn exactly what the proposals would do. And then we object specifically to the draconian provisions in those innocuous-sounding proposals.