Guns: how much longer will it take ....

I live in Australia. I ran into an African American man who had emmigrated here. He was well spoken / mannered / dressed. I asked him why he decided to move to Australia. He said he felt safe from the police here. It says a lot of the situation in the US that a well spoken well dressed black man would move here for such a reason.
Admittedly it is the smallest of sample sizes, as he is the only African American I've spoken to here - moving to Australia is very rare for them.

Those are cases where you proclaimed me guilty of racism and then invited me to try to prove myself innocent.

You obviously know almost nothing about Australia.

Absolutetly -just like you called me a liar, and asked me to quote where you had said 'it is a fact that progressives are evil'.... and I then quoted you.

The hypocrisy you engage in asking others to back their words up when you won't

the same reason you've avoided what you've been asked to provide...you can't, so you pretend you are not doing so of your own choice...with the motivation being you you don't have to acknowledge the truth to yourself.

On these forums, when it comes to conflict between a black person and a white person - you have never supported a black person involved in conflict with a white person (while supporting the white person every single time), you dismiss any context that supports black people (while supporting the white persons context every single time), you take to extremes your interpretation against black people (while minimising anything wrong the white person has done).

Each of these is evidenced. Nor can you show otherwise on these forums, and in this area you are extremely racist.

One of the strange things about your posts is they fail tests of justice:

Reasonableness: is the given reason reasonable? If not is not reasonable, it is not a valid reason for the action.

Proportionality: Eg. I shove you, so you shoot me, is not proportionate, and not reasonably justified.

Both of these tests you bias so heavily in favour the white person in each of your discussions that what is reasonable is no longer recognisable in your writings, and proportionality doesn't exist in your writings.

It's not the only issue you have - where something can't truly be known, you draw a conclusion and don't admit to any other possibility...always in favour of the white person.

However, I don't expect that you will admit to your racism. That you are, has been thoroughly exhibited by you, but we can justify anything to ourselves until we are black and blue in the face. If we truly want to believe something, others will never convince us otherwise.

I live in Australia. I ran into an African American man who had emmigrated here. He was well spoken / mannered / dressed. I asked him why he decided to move to Australia. He said he felt safe from the police here. It says a lot of the situation in the US that a well spoken well dressed black man would move here for such a reason.

Admittedly it is the smallest of sample sizes, as he is the only African American I've spoken to here - moving to Australia is very rare for them.

Perhaps Australians are more advanced when it comes to race relations.

NealNealNeal wrote:

perhaps we do not have a full understanding. I think that we should have a dialog and listen to the concerns of blacks.

NealNealNeal wrote:

We need to work together so that all people have the opportunity to succeed.

I'm way past caring about dialogue with these anti-white racists at this point. If they try to murder people, they'll be killed in self defense.

I have a rule:
- if I have conflict with one person, it may just be a conflict of personalities
- if I have conflict with two people, well, coincidences do happen
- if I have conflict with three people...it's time to look at the common denominator.

Now on a forum, the forum may attract people with particular ideas or inclinations, so the rule would have to be looked at in context (do you see how context is used?)...but a whole heap of people say:

- you don't deal with reality well (even though you claim otherwise)
- you keep peddling your opinion as fact (even though you claim otherwise)

...and on your side, you accuse more people of lying about you than anyone I've ever known.

In case this isn't clear - this isn't about logic, but human interaction, and human perception.

From my perception - they are correct.

I know that won't change your mind, and nor is it meant to (you've shown multiple times you don't)

the liar is you, about vikor and me. your own repeated claims prove that.

I'm not certain I'd exactly call what he's doing lying - as I think it is more of the nature that his mind is programmed so it won't let him think about particular arguments....and in its determined avoidance of thinking about such arguments...

he falls back to the only thing he can think of "it must be a lie".

Ie. He has a hard time dealing with reality.