Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Not wrong. The evidence proves that Mr. Zimmerman was the one who was standing there and Trayvon was the one who attacked him.



The evidence proves that this narrative never happened.

Not to mention the fact that the entire world could see that the person who recited that narrative was clearly lying.



The evidence shows that Trayvon attacked Mr. Zimmerman.



The evidence shows that Trayvon attacked Mr. Zimmerman.



The evidence shows that Trayvon attacked Mr. Zimmerman.



Rightly so. Mr. Zimmerman had every right to save himself.



I realize that BLM goons want black people to be allowed to murder police officers and white people with impunity, but no. Murder is not self defense.



I know BLM goons want it to be a crime for police officers and white people to defend themselves when black people try to murder them, but no. Self defense isn't murder.

You are not going with the evidence. Yoiyy are cherry picking and constructinh a fantasy narrative because you dont like the sworn testimony that vontradiicts your fable

Wrong again. The evidence shows very clearly that Mr. Zimmerman was staying in the one area and not following Trayvon.

Progressives really hate reality, but reality is hardly a fable.

Your the one who lives in a fantasy world.

Your inability to point out anything untrue in my posts shows otherwise.

Thank you, you just confirmed my opinion.

by culture you clearly racistically only mean WHITE culture, completely relegating all the black citizens in the ex-confederate states to non-persoknhood, because they sure as hell are not fans of the confederacy and its vendetta against their ancestors

That would be your racism not mine.

Progressive hatred of white culture is progressive racism.



I do no such thing.



That is their right. Black people have every right to be racists if they so choose.

I have the right to condemn their racism however.

talking of opposition to slavery, segregation, and racial discrimination as being racist is one of the most stupid immoral defenses of white racism I've ever seen. Shame on you.

You are not opposing slavery or segregation. You are opposing Southern culture.

Far from opposing racial discrimination, you are the one who is advocating racial discrimination. You justify your bigotry by explaining that it is only targeted at white people.

There is no stupidity in my opposition to your racism.

There is no immorality in my opposition to your racism.

Defending Southern culture is not defending racism.

There is no shame in my opposition to your racism.

Couple Charged After Videos Show White Woman Pulling Gun on Black Mother

A couple have been charged with felonious assault after widely circulated videos showed a white woman pointing
a gun at a Black woman in a parking lot in Michigan, the authorities said on Thursday.

I urge people who live in cites to come up with an urban version of the three S's to use if they need to defend themselves from violence.

I can't offer a lot of advice on what to do since I've no experience living in cities.

oralloy's three S's orally advocates are "Shoot, shovel, shut up", i.e. kill someone, bury the body, don't tell anyone, in other words, commit murder.

No. Self defense is not murder. People have the right to protect themselves when someone tries to harm them.

I realize that progressives can never get their heads around the idea of not being allowed to harm people they disagree with.

But progressives are wrong. Harming people is wrong.

Particularly wrong when cops do it and qualified immunity acts like a get out of jail free card and then the victim or relatives then have no way to see justice done.

Are you immune to reality? Qualified immunity has nothing to do with anyone getting out of jail.

All it does is prevent cities from paying damages.

Read the article. It doesn't apply just to cities. That's why it's a cornerstone of police reform legislation. And the general consensus here is that, despite your endless self-adulation, your grasp on reality is pretty tenuous.

It applies to whatever unit of government employs the police officers that are being sued.

This nitpicking doesn't change the reality that the only thing that this will change is how much government pays out in damages.



Appeals to the crowd are a logical fallacy.

Not to mention the reality that the consensus of delusional nutcases is pretty meaningless.

oralloy-Childish Name Calling R US..

I think that all policemen should have to have a physiological examination by a psychiatrist and any one who docent pass it should be dismissed. After all ALL citizens should trust the police who protect them are sane and not racists.