46
   

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:01 pm
@coldjoint,
bullshit. trump and his enablers are tearing the country apart. Vote him out in Nov. and restore sanity.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:02 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:
Considering charges are beings assessed for making a false claim to police, there's more evidence of criminal acts.

The notion that it's a crime to call the police when a black man tries to kill your pet is exactly why it is OK for people to shoot and kill any black men who might pose a threat to them.

Your claim that not leashing a dog justifies destroying someone's life is Orwellian and preposterous.
neptuneblue
 
  4  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:09 pm
@oralloy,
I knew you just couldn't resist bring up race into it.

She could have:

-turned and walked away
-leashed her pet

But the criminal in her allowed her to believe she was superior to a black man. She was wrong.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:17 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:
I knew you just couldn't resist bring up race into it.

Me?

I'm not the one who is saying that people should have their lives destroyed for calling the police when a black man tries to kill their pet.


neptuneblue wrote:
She could have:
-turned and walked away
-leashed her pet

No she couldn't have. He was trying to kill her pet.

Her choices were:

a) let him kill her pet

b) call the police and let her life be destroyed by deranged progressives

c) kill him and quietly slip away before the police arrive

She made the wrong choice. The correct option when a minority threatens you is to kill them and then slip away before the police arrive.


neptuneblue wrote:
But the criminal in her allowed her to believe she was superior to a black man.

There is nothing criminal about stopping a black man from killing your pet.

There is nothing superior about it either. It is just an attempt to save the life of her pet.


neptuneblue wrote:
She was wrong.

The only thing she did wrong was not kill the thug who was trying to kill her pet.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:25 pm
@oralloy,
It was her racist meltdown that triggered it. She was perfectly free to make the decision to react that way. She was perfectly free to respect the law and put her dog on the lkeash asshe was legally obligated to use. She didn't.. Now she has to live with the consequences of her decision. Maybe next time she'll okbey the law. And try curtailing your advocacy for murder.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:25 pm
@MontereyJack,
Wrong again. There is nothing racist about preventing a black man from killing your pet.

Neither is preventing a black man from killing your pet murder. People have every right to prevent people from killing their pets.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:28 pm
@oralloy,
It's racist to make that statement in the absence of any evidence that his aim was something other than leashing the dog. You immediately make extraordinarily malign inferences on no evidence, as usual.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:29 pm
@MontereyJack,
Wrong again. When a black man tries to kill your pet, there is nothing racist about calling the police.

There is also nothing wrong with gunning him down and slipping away undetected so that your life isn't destroyed by deranged progressives.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:30 pm
@oralloy,
whatever you're going to say when youj finally have a thought, you are merely makikng the most extreme possible pure supposition and advocating murder on that evidence-free opinion.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:31 pm
@MontereyJack,
Wrong again. Gunning down black men who try to kill your pet isn't murder. People have the right to protect their pets.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:32 pm
@oralloy,
yep, I was right.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:32 pm
@MontereyJack,
No you weren't. People have every right to protect their pets when a black man tries to kill them.
0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:35 pm
@oralloy,
You are negating her criminal action first.

She disobeyed a law concerning her animal. She refused to comply with a request to obey the law. With your reasoning, Mr. Cooper should have shot and killed her for criminal action.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:36 pm
@neptuneblue,
That's because her supposedly criminal action is a trivial offense.

My reasoning does not justify killing someone for a trivial offense. It does justify killing someone to protect the life of your pet.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:41 pm
@MontereyJack,
There is NO evidence his aim was anything other than trying to put the dog on a leash. That is entirely your own wildly unfounded malign opinion. Even in the zero probability case it were actually true, she would still be committing murder if she were to kill him. And you're again advocating racist murder.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:42 pm
@neptuneblue,
hear ye, hear ye.
0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:43 pm
@oralloy,
A non-leashed animal is not a trivial offence. It's a menace to society and there are laws about it. She broke the law, got caught, lost her job and criminal charges are pending.

She's a criminal and as such, can and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:45 pm
@neptuneblue,
Don't be silly. Not leashing your dog in the park doesn't warrant anything more than a ticket.

You are just as much of a menace as this woman is because of your speeding and your jaywalking.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:47 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
There is NO evidence his aim was anything other than trying to put the dog on a leash. That is entirely your own wildly unfounded malign opinion.

Wrong again. He said that she wasn't going to like what he was about to do and then tried to lure her pet away from her.


MontereyJack wrote:
Even in the zero probability case it were actually true, she would still be committing murder if she were to kill him.

Wrong again. Preventing a black man from killing your pet isn't murder.


MontereyJack wrote:
And you're again advocating racist murder.

Wrong again. Preventing a black man from killing your pet is neither racist nor murder.
neptuneblue
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2020 01:48 pm
@oralloy,
A criminal is a criminal, and she will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Don't forget the cowtipping....
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/16/2020 at 11:47:20