Guns: how much longer will it take ....

@InfraBlue,

InfraBlue wrote:

What part of "differentiate," and my explanation thereof do you not understand?

He has not seen your explanation thereof. If you provided it before, he missed it. He is asking you to restate your explanation thereof.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

You clearly thinkcivil rights are silly because you refuse to do anything about the gross violations of civil rights caused by gun violence, and you laugh at those who are trying to lessen that toll. Admit it, it's true.

2 Replies

@MontereyJack,

Progressive attempts to outlaw pistol grips on semi-auto rifles have nothing to do with lessening any toll or saving any lives.

Preventing progressives from outlawing pistol grips on semi-auto rifles does not harm anyone or damage civil rights in any way.

0 Replies

@InfraBlue,

Quote:

What part of "differentiate," and my explanation thereof do you not understand?

The part I don't understand is the part you have yet to explain. The part I do understand is your failure to explain the difference between an assault weapon and an assault rifle.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Quote:

you laugh at those who are trying to lessen that toll.

If he's laughing at anything, he's laughing at the silly idea that a pistol-grip, barrel shroud, or flash suppressor makes a rifle so dangerous that any rifle that has these items should be banned.

0 Replies

@Glennn,

You need to read before knee-jerk replying.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

He needs to learn to read before knee-jerk responding.

0 Replies

@InfraBlue,

Now you're claiming that pointing out your failure to explain the difference between an assault weapon and an assault rifle is a kneejerk reply.

After you explain the difference between an assault rifle and an assault weapon, explain how it is that asking you to do so qualifies as a kneejerk reply.

2 Replies

@Glennn,

You have to believe everything the uneducated gun owners say about guns or you are a murderer and an enabler.

0 Replies

@Glennn,

Here, https://able2know.org/topic/131081-410#post-6972721. There'll be a quiz on the reading.

2 Replies

@InfraBlue,

Now you're seeing things. That post does not contain anything even remotely resembling your explanation of the difference between an assault weapon and an assault rifle. However, it does contain me asking you the question of what the difference is between an assault weapon and an assault rifle.

If you could actually produce the post in which you explain the difference between an assault rifle and an assault weapon, that would be swell. Or, you could just explain the difference right now. But based on your past and current performance regarding that simple task, I won't hold my breath.

0 Replies

@InfraBlue,

InfraBlue wrote:

Here, https://able2know.org/topic/131081-410#post-6972721. There'll be a quiz on the reading.

https://able2know.org/topic/131081-410#post-6972721

2 Replies

@InfraBlue,

Quote:

An assault rifle is capable of burst or automatic fire, whereas an assault weapon such as the AR-15 is a weapon based on assault rifles sans the burst or automatic fire capability.

So, even though the AR-15 does not function as an assault rifle, you believe that it nonetheless qualifies as an assault weapon. Now all you have to do is explain how calling it a weapon instead of a rifle changes anything about it.

1 Reply

@Glennn,

It differentiates it from an assault rifle for legislative purposes.

1 Reply

@InfraBlue,

The question to you was: how does calling a non assault rifle an assault weapon change anything about the non assault rifle?

1 Reply

@Glennn,

Physically, it doesn't. Legislatively, which is what this thread is about, it does.

2 Replies

@InfraBlue,

So in other words, the only argument that you have for outlawing the AR-15 is the fact that you've arbitrarily applied a scary name to it.

Arbitrarily applying a scary name to a weapon does not create a compelling government interest in restricting it.

1 Reply

@InfraBlue,

InfraBlue wrote:

an assault weapon . . . is a weapon based on assault rifles sans the burst or automatic fire capability.

That is a fraudulent definition. Only weapons that have burst or automatic fire capability meet the true definition of the term assault weapon.

InfraBlue wrote:

an assault weapon such as the AR-15

Semi-auto-only AR-15 rifles lack the burst or automatic fire capability that is required for them to meet the true definition of the term assault weapon.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Wrong. The argument I have for outlawing the AR-15 is because it's only difference from military issue weapons is selective fire capability, and the fact that it's extensively used in murderous crimes.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:
an assault weapon . . . is a weapon based on assault rifles sans the burst or automatic fire capability.

That is a fraudulent definition.

No it's not.

oralloy wrote:

Only weapons that have burst or automatic fire capability meet the true definition of the term assault weapon.

No they don't.

oralloy wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:
an assault weapon such as the AR-15

Semi-auto-only AR-15 rifles lack the burst or automatic fire capability that is required for them to meet the true definition of the term assault weapon.

Yours is an incorrect definition of the term "assault weapon."

1 Reply

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know