Guns: how much longer will it take ....

The point I was trying to make is that "pistol grip" is a distraction. If you make the discussion about 'pistol grips, you might as well claim the color of the weapon makes it more dangerous. It's just a way to avoid responsibility.

1 Reply

@Glennn,

youre also quite an idiot .Ive been stating for quite sometime that the ROF with these pieces of "design makeup" do hve fire rate assistqnce uses in URBAN ASSAULT, where a normal barrel and normal forepiece like you have on a, say, 45-70 carbine WOULD GET IN THE WAY. I was perfectly clear of that. You guys are just busy cackling on a single issue that was really included in the 94 "Weapons ban" without any explanations. O yes, there was no real functional reason for adding them except as some douche bag political trick to pass over big clips and rapid fire semis. or that it was for 'Urban targeting". They knew what they were aying and it was both DEMS and GOPS who crafted the bill , (no matter who voted "for it")

Now just go way and play with oral

2 Replies

@farmerman,

Let's take this one issue at a time.

So you're okay with pistol-grips on a semiautomatic rifle. Yes? No?

Quote:

a shortened barrel and pistol grip will show a marked increase rate of accurate fire than a standard rifle.

Can you cite something to prove this claim?

Yeah, that's what I thought.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

In your mind.

Nope. In reality.

farmerman wrote:

Ive found it rather easy to best you at so many subjects that all the funs gone for me.

You cannot provide any examples of you ever besting me at anything.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

yeh youre probably right. Ill just have to take solace in the fact that Im smarter than you and oral together. BUT really , thats nothing for me to brag about eh?

My IQ is 170.

The fact that you can never make an intelligent argument, but instead you rely solely on childish name-calling, shows that your IQ is considerably less than mine.

As is the case with many people, I really don't have any sense of Glennn's IQ. But the fact that he makes factual and logical arguments definitely puts him far ahead of you.

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

I'm in this ilk of people with no mental capacity as well.

I would say that you are a lot smarter than Farmerman and Izzythepush. You don't rely on childish name-calling the way that they do.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

youre also quite an idiot .

You engage in childish name-calling because you are unable to add anything intelligent to the conversation.

farmerman wrote:

Ive been stating for quite sometime that the ROF with these pieces of "design makeup" do hve fire rate assistqnce uses in URBAN ASSAULT, where a normal barrel and normal forepiece like you have on a, say, 45-70 carbine WOULD GET IN THE WAY. I was perfectly clear of that.

Note that "assault weapons" bans do not usually address barrel length.

farmerman wrote:

You guys are just busy cackling on a single issue that was really included in the 94 "Weapons ban" without any explanations.

The fact that you don't care about saving lives and only want to violate people's civil liberties for fun is pretty relevant.

farmerman wrote:

O yes, there was no real functional reason for adding them except as some douche bag political trick to pass over big clips and rapid fire semis. or that it was for 'Urban targeting". They knew what they were aying and it was both DEMS and GOPS who crafted the bill , (no matter who voted "for it")

It is rather Orwellian for you to blame Republicans for a law that you support and they oppose.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

oral was the one who began it with his mantrae debate techniques.

Wrong. You started it with your demands to outlaw pistol grips. I just countered your demand to violate everyone's civil liberties for no reason.

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

That's what my cat does.

You as well have an IQ considerably less than mine, based on the fact that you don't say anything intelligent and instead rely solely on childish name-calling.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

that "good guy with a gun" hypothesis is motly bullhit.

LOL! No it isn't. Why do you think we provide police officers with guns?

Or are you one of those progressives who wants to disarm police officers as well?

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

Why do you think we provide police officers with guns

dont talk like an idiot.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

I see that you have no intelligent rebuttal to my point.

1 Reply

I'm headed out to see Star Wars again. I'll be back later.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Was that a threat?

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

I see that you have no intelligent rebuttal to my point.

I imagine that you are the only one who thinks it warrants same.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

You'd be wrong. Those of us who are capable of intelligent discussion know that it is far preferable to the childish name-calling that you engage in.

0 Replies

@RABEL222,

RABEL222 wrote:

Was that a threat?

No. Star Wars is a famous series of blockbuster movies.

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

glitterbag wrote:

The point I was trying to make is that "pistol grip" is a distraction.

Your point is wrong. It is the central issue. Progressives are trying to outlaw pistol grips, and we will not allow them to do so.

glitterbag wrote:

If you make the discussion about 'pistol grips, you might as well claim the color of the weapon makes it more dangerous.

True. It would amount to the same thing.

Outlawing guns based on their color would also serve the progressives' goal of violating people's civil liberties for fun.

glitterbag wrote:

It's just a way to avoid responsibility.

Wrong. It's a way for progressives to try to violate people's civil liberties for fun.

0 Replies

@revelette3,

revelette3 wrote:

The shooting in Texas is billed as sort of a "good guys with a gun." My question is, what if the bad guy wasn't allowed to have the gun in the church in the first place? Then no one would have been killed.

You mean like how "not allowing bad guys to take guns into schools" prevents school shootings?

0 Replies

@Glennn,

Glennn wrote:

Quote:

It's apparent that you are having difficulty processing my claim for gun control.

Okay. So, if a rifle has a pistol-grip, what item in combination with that pistol-grip prompts you to call for the banning of that rifle?

Something along the specs of an AR-15, AK47, and others.

1 Reply

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know