Guns: how much longer will it take ....

If this even neared the truth, you would not have the obsession for repeatedly telling everybody what your supposed I.Q. is. So, deny it all you need to, fact is, it does matter to you what others think of you.

I have no such obsession. It is you and a few other people who always bring up my IQ. Someone is obsessed about my IQ here, but it isn't me.

Since I possess morality and ethics, I would be bothered and try to make things right if I had somehow wronged someone. That's not really something that you'd understand though. Leftists don't have morality or ethics.

But as far as me caring because leftists hate me for telling the truth, no. I don't care at all that you hate me for telling the truth.

what an idiot you are. The one who first, and frequently, brought up IQ was YOU. As if noone else has one. Youve clearly tried to impress others with an empty boast as if it were a "silver bullet" or something. Youve been so wrong on so many counts that youve obviously forgotten that our genetics and past learning endow us with a mere "POTENTIAL" which is what IQ actually means. Lerning and other training and experience , may take someone less SB "endowed" to actually be smarter than you . That I can rad over and over from your wimpy mntra-like responses. (Youve got nothing to say o you use passive aggressive insults and assertions, most of which assume that youve got some math proof that youre a mental giant and how wrong you are)
Not having shown evidence, in numerous areas of any kind of research or training , just mere suppositions and mantric repetitions, you kinda backed your ass into the corner of your own making so I consider many folks here superior to you, youre a bluff, they are not.

Just folks? We have a dog who can say sausages.



And he's housetrained.

Heck, I saw a pile of sawdust which arranged itself to say 'Impeach the lying thieving crook!'

Don't be silly, Hillary isn't the President of the US, we can't impeach her, she can be thrown in jail though for her thieving crook ways.

I neglected to mention that termite dust outlined an arrow shape pointing at a photo of Trump.

any actual evidence?? Is there an actual crime involved?? are you just pulling this out of the files from some DOT com rightwing blog???



I thought so

All that after Oralloy told you he does not care what you think about him? OK.

That was not destroyed while the FBI watched, I hope so.

If you have spent any time working for any form of govt, you would realize she violated several laws. Having just one classified doc where it isn't suppose to be is enough to bring charges. While some of the doc's that were there were classified afterwards, there were still a bunch that were classified before they ended up on her server.

Now the question they didn't get to the bottom of, how those emails made it from the secured network to the unsecured network? There is zero connection between these networks and information can't be moved between them, unless they are either copied to a storage device, which is a violation, or they were printed out and then photo copied into an e-document again, which is also a violation.

Comey laid out the case, then punted and said they would have a hard time finding her a prosecutor to actually do their job.


The only reason he said this is because it was Hillary Clinton and she was running for President. If this were you or me, we would be sitting in jail right now with a guilty plea. Hillary Clinton was associated with or worked for the Federal govt in one capacity or another for over 20 years, she knew the protocols and had training to understand how to handle classified information, she and her staff disregarded those protocols and rules for whatever reason, intent has zero meaning when it comes to govt security. There was a Marine who took a picture of an area of a submarine that wasn't suppose to be photographed, he took the picture for his own memory, because he was a guard on the sub. He was put in jail because he took that photo, he also threw away the cellphone that had the picture on it, when the FBI started asking questions, he got more time for that. Hillary's people smashed cellphones with hammers before they could be handed over to the FBI, why aren't those people in trouble for destroying evidence?

We already know her supporters won't see the facts of the case. One of the people here who claims to have worked on such systems has refused to discuss the questions about moving info between the secured and unsecured networks, she knows the rules and laws were violated but won't admit it.

It's the same Crimes Trump is being accused of. You have that list handy, right?

my my, in order to reach the level of evidence it ought to be corroborated in a many ways a poible.
What you see Schiff doing is tightening the noose about actual crims, such as bribery or extortion an that continues to point to a fact that crimes WERE committed.

I recognize that the charges against Ms Clinton went away as soon as the election was over an the "lock her up" choir no longer needed to b fed the music.

I suppose that She can probably be charged with "Incompetence on the internet".

Nice try, but there is no evidence that Mr. Trump has accepted any bribes.

He may well have done the rest of what he is accused of, but there is nothing even remotely illegal about the rest of what he is being accused of.

You engage in name-calling because you aren't smart enough to contribute anything useful to a discussion.



Wrong again. I'm almost never the one who brings it up. It doesn't bother me a bit that I'm vastly smarter than you are. There's no obsession on my end.

I only address the issue because you keep obsessing over the fact that I'm smarter than you are. If you didn't keep bringing it up, probably no one else would either.



Wrong again. I merely set the record straight whenever you misrepresent my intelligence.



Wrong again. You cannot point out any errors in my posts.



Wrong again. That's you, not me.



Wrong again. I'm not backed into any sort of corner at all.



Considering your unimpressive intellect, "what you consider" isn't worth the electrons that you wasted writing that post.



Wrong again. I never bluff. Quite frankly, bluffing just isn't in my skill set.

Anyway, now that we've gotten that out of the way, do you have any more of those delicious tears? 🍸

It's a shame that I can't bill Farmerman for the wasted electrons.

Yes there is. Would you like to discuss it?

Didn't think so.

Apparently physics isnt in your "skill set " whereas BS is firmly in there.


As far as your boats ased on Vastly superior. I really really doubt that youd keep up in , , debate, short term memory, verbal or math skills.
But thats not my style. I like correcting error, not boasting about IQ . I endeavor to be accurate, not assertive .

see above. I feel that you and he are equally smart guys, just not smart enough to wrap it up.