@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:does a ranch gun hqve a huge clip
Just like with any other gun, that has nothing at all to do with the gun, and is entirely based on what sort of magazine you attach to the gun.
I should add, you sound pretty ignorant when you refer to magazines as clips. Of course I normally let such things pass and focus on the meat of the argument instead. But since you are using such tactics against me, perhaps I should return the favor.
Of course, now you'll ignore my rebuttal of your point and focus on your clip/magazine blunder instead. But you would have ignored the main point anyway so I guess it doesn't really matter.
farmerman wrote:other features like a swing away stock etc etc, that allow it to be pointed and shot at rapid rates with lotsa ammo??
None of these features involve rate of fire.
farmerman wrote:If so, then it oughta be handled the same way as all the other AR wannabees.
The way such guns ought to be handled is: they should be treated as normal ordinary rifles, because that is exactly what they are.
farmerman wrote:Whats so hard to understand/ Brands dont kill people, GUNS with massive loads seem to be the ones involved with almost all the mass shootings weve experienced. Columbine, Connecticut, LAs Vegas, and Florida.
You tell us.
You are the one who keeps distracting from the issue of magazine capacity with goofy attempts to ban cosmetic features.
farmerman wrote:DO you need me to make up a list?? Im not sure I know all the wannabee POS that you penus envy guys try to hump and whine when the grownup wanna take em away or mod em so they arent as available with such a high lethality index.
Bigoted name-calling is all that any of you freedom haters have.
