Guns: how much longer will it take ....

@oralloy,

whine whine whine whine

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DWg4XOTVoAAE1s6.jpg

http://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/966078572321562625

http://www.gannett-cdn.com/media/2018/02/20/USATODAY/USATODAY/636547353091154050-04.JPG

1 Reply

@oralloy,

dinesh Dsouza is an ass. What they are is disgusted that the legislature should be such corrupt pawns for the murderous giun lobbuy.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Support for civil rights is neither corrupt nor murderous.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

obviously reading comprehension isnt a skill youve attained.But, as I say, how literate do you have to be to keep incessantly repeating one or two lines??

1 Reply

@farmerman,

The reason why you engage in childish name-calling is because you have no facts to justify your anti-freedom agenda.

2 Replies

@oralloy,

Quote:

The reason why you engage in childish name-calling is because you have no facts to justify your anti-freedom agenda.

That is not the only reason he calls names. The facts that are pointed out frustrate him like a child who has dropped their ice cream cone, they lash out at anyone, but the person that dropped it, themselves.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

as I asked , but you just choose to keep up your bumper sticker attacks, How sharp y gotta be to keep repeating same ole dumass phrases everytime youre called on em???

You actually believe that you represent what our Demo Republic stands for??

you seem to believe "Freedom for all so long as they are free to believe only as you do ".

YOU REALLY DONT UNDERSTAND OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT AND OUR CONSTITUTION.

2 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

as I asked , but you just choose to keep up your bumper sticker attacks,

As long as you run around demanding to violate people's civil rights for fun, you are going to be criticized for it.

farmerman wrote:

How sharp y gotta be to keep repeating same ole dumass phrases everytime youre called on em???

Your dislike of truthful and factual criticism does not mean that there is anything wrong with me posting truthful and factual criticism.

farmerman wrote:

You actually believe that you represent what our Demo Republic stands for??

Well, I certainly stand up for civil rights and prevent you from violating them for fun.

farmerman wrote:

you seem to believe "Freedom for all so long as they are free to believe only as you do ".

Nonsense. You are free to dislike civil rights all you want.

You just are not free to violate people's civil rights.

farmerman wrote:

YOU REALLY DONT UNDERSTAND OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT AND OUR CONSTITUTION.

I understand it perfectly. And it does not allow you to run around violating people's civil rights for fun.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

Quote:

You actually believe that you represent what our Demo Republic stands for??

Do you actually think you can repeal the 2nd amendment? That system needs two thirds of the states. Until that is done he is right, not wrong.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

as was said numerous times to the folks on your wavelength,(Who, for the most part, seem to be unencumbered by the thought process) NO-ONE has herein called for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment. You guys seem to have very little attachment to facts and little respect for truth.
I and several others have merely addressed the fact that we already HAVE a Firearms Law that was heavily supported by the NRA when it was passed by Congress..
I believe several of your folks do not feel that this law, as modified, detracts from the scope and breadth of the 2nd Amendment. Controls of firearms that can deliver many bullets at high speed in an urban assault weapon are whats the "target"

Try to keep your arguments away from wacky superlatives and stick with facts that are not "alternative"

2 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

as was said numerous times to the folks on your wavelength,(Who, for the most part, seem to be unencumbered by the thought process)

Our thinking is just fine. That's why you can't provide any logical arguments against our position.

farmerman wrote:

NO-ONE has herein called for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment.

You've called for it before.

farmerman wrote:

You guys seem to have very little attachment to facts and little respect for truth.

You can't point out anything that we're wrong about.

farmerman wrote:

Controls of firearms that can deliver many bullets at high speed in an urban assault weapon are whats the "target"

You just spent several pages engaged in name-calling over pistol grips.

farmerman wrote:

Try to keep your arguments away from wacky superlatives and stick with facts that are not "alternative"

We always do that.

3 Replies

@oralloy,

I already produced a logical rational counter to yiur tuff. It was waaaay back when you tarted your **** about outlawing Democrats and calling those who didnt believe like you "traitors" and, in addition, where you seemed to state that assault weapon control was limited to "pistol grips"
Dont you even recall your bumper stickers??

Early onset?

Quote:

You've called for it before.

I called for its refinement so that it would make sense at most. SCholars and the courts disagree (No decisions have been unanimous) SInce youve been slowly grudgingly agreeing to design control on militqry style weapons, it may not be necessary but it still will be generational

2 Replies

@oralloy,

Quote:

You just spent several pages engaged in name-calling over pistol grips

Wometims you come across really dim . I said that pistol grips were a "packqge design" where the gun, in order to be able to smoothly engage in rapid fire and not hve major recoil problem , had pistol grips. I HQVE been one whose made the distinction that its the rapid fire of large amounts of bullets that I see as the terminus of what needs the changing.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

We always do that

Equivocations are your principal game, truth has no place in your world

1 Reply

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

I already produced a logical rational counter to yiur tuff.

No you haven't.

farmerman wrote:

Dont you even recall your bumper stickers??

Your referring to facts as bumper stickers does not change the fact that you have no logical counter to these facts.

farmerman wrote:

I called for its refinement so that it would make sense at most.

It makes sense now.

The only reason you want to change it is because it won't let you violate people's rights for no reason, and that is what you want to do.

farmerman wrote:

SInce youve been slowly grudgingly agreeing to design control on militqry style weapons,

My position is unchanged.

farmerman wrote:

it may not be necessary but it still will be generational

Future generations are not going to start rejecting freedom and civil rights.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

Quote:

SInce youve been slowly grudgingly agreeing to design control on militqry style weapons, it may not be necessary but it still will be generational

At this time in history we should not be weakening our country, this is a time to stand up to bullies that control the MSM. America cannot not lose its virility or we lose. Guns are an important part of our history, don't let slack law enforcement enforced by progressive regulations or terrorists or just plain crazy take them away.

I will have to admit I paraphrased what Theodore Roosevelt said about the importance attached to a nations virility, it is not a dirty word. Something the next generation should know about, especially, because it comes from a progressive hero.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

Wometims you come across really dim .

No I don't. You just get frustrated when the facts are against you, and you falsely accuse people of being dim because you have no other arguments.

farmerman wrote:

I said that pistol grips were a "packqge design" where the gun, in order to be able to smoothly engage in rapid fire and not hve major recoil problem , had pistol grips.

That is nonsense. Pistol grips are not an enabler of rapid fire.

farmerman wrote:

I HQVE been one whose made the distinction that its the rapid fire of large amounts of bullets that I see as the terminus of what needs the changing.

You certainly weren't making this distinction in your recent name-calling tantrum over pistol grips.

2 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

Equivocations are your principal game, truth has no place in your world

You have a big mouth for someone who can't point out any errors in my statements.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

You must be feeling pretty special right now. Look at you!!! Getting all that attention.

1 Reply

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know