57
   

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Forums: Politics, Guns, Gun Control, U S Politics, American Conservatives
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 10:17 am
@coldjoint,
Oh well, that justifies all the killing eh?
Is your fingerhold on reality that contrived?

coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 10:20 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Oh well, that justifies all the killing eh?


Did I say that, no I did not.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 10:21 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Most of what he says comes from the founding fathers.
Look into the history of the NRA and its association with the Firearms Act.
PS , Hardly anything of what Oralloy posts is a direct quote from the Constitution. Point me to the section that uses "Freedom Haters", or refers to "Those that want to despoil our civil rights"??




coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 10:25 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Point me to the section that uses "Freedom Haters",


They are covered under the sections concerned with sedition.
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 10:48 am
@coldjoint,
Thats how many of you think. Quote something from 1798 and fail to follow it up.

coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 10:49 am
Quote:
Section 3 - The Text
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.


It only makes sense to call freedom haters traitors.
http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/article-iii-section-3
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 10:54 am
@coldjoint,
BRANDENBURG v OHIO. These"Enemies or Sedition" laws(as modified since 1798) would probably be considered unconstitutional today.


coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 10:54 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
1798

U.S. Constitution: 1789 . Here is a link you should understand
https://bensguide.gpo.gov/about-ben-and-gpo
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 10:56 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
would probably be considered unconstitutional today.


Probably? Is that a legal term? Stop wasting my time.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 11:05 am
@coldjoint,
read the history of the sedition acts. You jut try to hide when my simple question was where in the constitution does the term "freedom haters" show up?
Or how about "The Democratic party should be outlawed"

WHO THE hell died and left you clowns in charge of a Democratic Republic??



0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 11:07 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
It only makes sense to call freedom haters traitors
Both phrases are bald faced lies and are themselves traitorous to what our country spouses and promotes.

Pinky youre just a few stems short of a ganglion
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 11:09 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Both phrases are bald faced lies

Prove it. And my ganglion lacks less than your spine lacks vertebrae.
gungasnake
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 01:28 pm
It doesn't take the world's loosest definition of treason to want to see people brought to justice for Fast-and-Furious, Uranium-1, or the Steele dossier and its misuse for obtaining FISA warrants to be used for political purposes.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 01:36 pm
@gungasnake,
all of which are mfrd; bullshit, especially U-1.
The truth is out there(Unless youre a Trump licker)
farmerman
 
  4  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 01:38 pm
@coldjoint,
have you been a twit all your life?? Cause youre entire history here is redolent with twitness
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 01:40 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
have you been a twit all your life?


Try the topic, no one, especially me, is interested in your puerile name calling.
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 03:54 pm
@coldjoint,
so then quit the terms of "traitor," and" freedom haters", twit.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 03:58 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
traitor


I do not think I ever said "freedom haters", the use of "traitor" is when it applies. Please tell someone else what to do.
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 04:11 pm
@coldjoint,
when you are an apologist you are of the same mind. So pleeease,dont blow smoke.
"I didnt murder him, I just helped dispose of the body"
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2018 04:23 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
you are of the same mind

That's ironic coming from you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Guns: how much longer will it take ....
  3. » Page 110
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 11/27/2024 at 12:50:16
▲ ▼