Let's get rid of the Electoral College

Id feel better if they jut would vote to do away with the "winner take all" assignment of electors.
That would make every state more representative of a "one man, one vote" set-up.

When you raise the issue of my intelligence

That's a major part of the definition of a fool, not knowing one is one.

I dont bring up your SB score, YOU DO. Everyone else here merely responds in kind.

You are a fraud,

a stupid wanker and someone who is least able to analyze abstractly.

I will herein and hereon, ignore your masturbatory assertions

1You say something really vapid (Like winner take all is NOT voter disenfranchisement),

2 I call attention by saying that youve just made a stupid remark

3. TO which you assert that Im bringing up youre self-proclaimed IQ?

Ya know, I think, besides acquiring math skills, becoming waay more creative, and learning more history, I think you need help in handling your ass backwards self -esteem problem.

Superiority complexes are really inferiority complexes turned upside down.

I know youll post some seriatim Bullshit

your masturbatory assertions

I believe the Electoral College must be retained , otherwise we would have to make a major Constitutional Amendment drive converting our Rep Govt away from Democratic Republic. Im satisfied with the Republic concept. Im jut annoyed at the way the EC has been fiddled with. "Winner take all " strips the loser of any states plurality of ANY electors.
Im including Calif . The GOP has glued themselves to the "WTA" means of selecting electors.

It would do away with these key states that often win an election for a popular vote LOSER (Like Trump).

In reqlity, it would turn our presidential elections into as close to a popular vote without having to overhaul our entire Constitution.

Im jut annoyed at the way the EC has been fiddled with.

"Winner take all" strips the loser of any states plurality of ANY electors.
Im including Calif.

The GOP has glued themselves to the "WTA" means of selecting electors.

It would do away with these key states that often win an election for a popular vote LOSER (Like Trump).

In reality, it would turn our presidential elections into as close to a popular vote without having to overhaul our entire Constitution.

I think getting any kind of change is a long shot, but it seems that changing the "winner take all" feature has the best shot of happening.

The notion that the Republican candidate was still in play although being 7,000,000 votes behind should disgust anyone who champions the notion of democracy...

which seems to eliminate a huge segment of the Republican Party.

Quite frankly, I am more worried by the fact that a state like Wyoming (population less than 600,000) has 2 senators representing its people...and a state like California (population almost 40,000,000) has only 2.

That also should disgust anyone who champions the notion of democracy.

In any case, an attempt by the Democrats to right this wrong SHOULD be made while they have any fire-power whatever. At least an attempt to rectify it should be made.

Its the desire for "one prson, one vote". Winnr take all just dumps that into an ash bin.
Most of the mutants of the Trumpy crowd know thi but insist on making voter suppression , gerrymndering, and disenfranchisement as the only ways they can possibly win.
The GOP has been caught now with the Ga bill. I hope the USSC comes down on that, if not, we are heading for a GOP driven fascist state.