@iamsam82,
iamsam82 wrote:
Let me guess...
right wing...
er...
middle-aged plus...
Almost certainly American...
Owns a gun in case the crucifix isn't quite powerful enough...
Did not go into further education...
All good guesses.
Mostly wrong but, still, quite good.
1. Certainly not right-wing. Perhaps slightly left of center would be the closest.
2. Unfortunately, a bit beyond middle age. Unless 71 is now 'the new 51.'
3. American by adoption. Born in Northeastern Europe.
4. Do own a couple of fire-sticks but no crucifixes at all.
5. Two academic degrees. Never went for the PhD.
I do appreciate GW's standing up for me although I took no offense at your estimate, sam. And, since I've been asked, I'll explain what I meant by being amused at your post.
I'm no Christian, but I do think that early Christianity has taken a largely undeserved beating at the hands of the atheist hordes here on A2k and elsewhere. Say what you will about the closed minds of the so-called Church fathers in the early days following the collapse of the Roman Empire, but if it weren't for the monks and priests working to copy some ancient manuscripts (including a great deal of secular scientiifc work), we might not have anything resembling a Euro-centered culture at all today. The hordes coming out of the
Schwartzwald and crossing the Rhine -- Goths, Vandals, Saxons, Angles, Jutes, Franks, etc. etc. -- were burning everything in sight, particularly books (known as
codices) and parchment scrolls since these were of no use to the invaders. None of them could read.
It is largely due to one Patricius (whom the Irish now dub Saint Patrick) that some of the Western culture -- Aristotle, Archimedes, Eratosthenes etc. etc. etc. -- is still available to us. Patrick brought not only Christianity to Ireland but literacy as well.
And if you read anything at all about the early Church in Eire, you will soon come to the conclusion that the intransigence of Church hierarchy was by no means as rigid as we like to believe. Learning was valued above all and there was a kind of equality which later ages would have considered quite heretical, not to say blasphemous. Prioresses in female convents often had as much authority in the administration of a parish as male bishops and archbishops. We also tend to forget that monasteries were about the only places where anything resembling scientific research was being conducted at all. Granted, by today's standards some of this experimentation seems nothing more than superstition -- alchemy, atrology, the search for the philosopher's stone. Nonsense, right? But compare that to what was going on outside those monasteries. The Christian religious institutions were almost the only pin-points of light in those so-called Dark Ages. (I say 'almost' because there was certainly an interest in scientific inquiry among the Jews of Europe. But their access to research materials was limited and, given the prejudices of the time, they were inclined to maintain a low profile.
I also quite agree with Green Witch regarding the wearing of the burqa. Would we really rather see an Islamic-dominated world today rather than a nominally Christian one?