Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jul, 2013 06:25 pm
This might be of interest:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/07/130726191729.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fhealth_medicine+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Health+%26+Medicine+News%29

I thought it interesting, that the idea was mentioned, that those that are allowed to legally carry a gun would truly benefit a mass shooting situation if they got proper training, so they wouldn't accidentally shoot bystanders, or people fleeing the situation. Would gun holders accept going through such a training effort?
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 30 Jul, 2013 06:49 pm
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:
This might be of interest:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/07/130726191729.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fhealth_medicine+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Health+%26+Medicine+News%29

I thought it interesting, that the idea was mentioned, that those that are allowed to legally carry a gun would truly benefit a mass shooting situation if they got proper training, so they wouldn't accidentally shoot bystanders, or people fleeing the situation. Would gun holders accept going through such a training effort?

So people who got the extra training would then be authorized to approach and confront a bad guy instead of remaining in a defensive posture?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 06:46:52