@sozobe,
sozobe wrote:
This, by the way, is proven false by the above FactCheck entry:
Quote:Berg has said that he would drop his case if Obama simply provides documentary proof of his birth, but to date the candidate has not done so, instead releasing only images of a purported "certification of live birth" to the partisan Daily Kos blog and the sympathetic FactCheck web site.
The campaign didn't just release "images" of the birth certificate, they released a copy of
the actual certificate. (Not "copy" as in scan or xerox but as in "official birth certificate" of the type you'd use for anything that requires one.) That's a quickly provable falsehood.
So all Berg has to go on is accusing FactCheck of lying because they're in the tank for Obama, and that's a tough row to hoe.
How do you know? Do you think FactCheck actually checked with the State of Hawaii to verify the authenticity of the birth certificate? And why hasn't the campaign simply produced that actual certificate to the judge to put that lawsuit to rest? McCain has produced every piece of documentation re his record, credentials, citizenship, etc. that has been requested and there has been no secrecy that I'm aware of. (There was much made during the time Cindy Mccain didn't release her private financial information that John had no part of.)
It seems that it would be very simple for Obama to satisfy the lawsuit in a manner satisfactory to anybody. Certainly a sitting U.S. Senator and Presidential candidate has the clout to obtain an affidavit from the authorities testifying to the authenticity of the document. Here is what FactCheck says they received as authentication:
Quote: The "secrecy" ended when Tommy Vietor at the Obama campaign sent a message to us and other reporters saying, "I know there have been some rumors spreading about Obama’s citizenship, so I wanted to make sure you all had a copy of his birth certificate." A digital image was attached.
They accepted what the Obama campaign gave them as apparently so do you. They also in a roundabout way stated they did not verify it. What evidence is there that it isn't a forgery as skillful as the one Dan Rather attempted to use to discredit George W. Bush?
But that authentic birth certificate presented to the judge, preferably in front of a battery of reporters, and having it ruled authentic, could put this whole thing to rest. It raises a legitimate question why Obama has not done that. And the fact that he is allowing no members of the press to accompany him to Hawaii on this trip also leaves room to speculate if he will be making a trip to the court house trying to come up with something to help him out here.