29
   

FINAL COUNTDOWN FOR USA ELECTION 2008

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:26 pm
@Foxfyre,
Quote:

But other than the remarks of a few hateful members of the AIP, it just doesn't strike me as a particularly radical, subversive, or extremist organization nor one that is Anti-American. It is very much pro-Alaska.


Fox, that was the founder of the AIP who made those remarks.

How can you say it's not anti-American? It's a secessionist party. It was created with the intent of getting AK out of the USA. It's as anti-American as things come, Fox.

Quote:

And while Sarah Palin has been gracious to the AIP as it contains a large chunk of Alaskans, there is no evidence that she was inspired to become a member or that she ever used any of its radical members as mentors, advocates, associates, or spokespersons to help her move up the political ladder.


Funny you should say that, as Palin's political mentor was a member of the AIP - from Newsweek:

Quote:
To the extent Palin has a governing philosophy, it was shaped by her political mentor, former governor Wally Hickel. The 89-year-old Hickel is a member of the Alaska Independence Party, which espouses, among other things, greater autonomy or even separation from the United States. (Husband Todd Palin is not a member of the party now, but he was registered as an AIP voter at different periods of his life totaling seven years. Sarah has never been a member but attended a party conference in her hometown of Wasilla.)


http://www.newsweek.com/id/157696

So, it seems her mentor was a member of the party, and one who formed her ideology, and helped her move up the political ladder. Care to respond to this fact? I only ask, because it sort of torpedoes your claim above.

Cycloptichorn
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:26 pm
@Foxfyre,
McCain apposed "most of that" to change his true stripes; he voted with Bush 90% of the time during the past eight years. His flip-flops on regulation/de-regulation should have most conservatives confused about his true position. His recent leadership skills during the bailout legislation was a bust, but he was trying to take credit when most of the legislation was already completed by congress and the committee. His input during the white house meeting was non-existent, but he tried again to take full credit that delayed the meeting 2-3 hours by insiders. Most those who attended said Obama made some good suggestions on the bailout legislation.

Leadership and judgment seems lacking by McCain's recent shenanigans; only conservatives are blind to them.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:30 pm
@spendius,
Spendi, you are being absurd.

I have NEVER.....nor has any Conservative I know EVER.....opposed health care for everybody. We ALL think health care for everybody is a fine idea. We just don't agree with a big government program or government mandates as the best way to achieve it. John McCain's healthcare program is probably unrealistic in the way he has laid that out, but he has the right basic idea. Government CAN implement policies and incentives that makes it possible for healthcare to be more competitive which is the best way to bring down the cost without taking away the peoples' choices and freedoms, and Government can manipulate the tax policy to make health care more affordable for everybody.

Why President Bush didn't get that done when he had a Republican majority, I can't say other than much of his agenda was set aside in the wake of 9/11. There isn't a snowball's chance in hell of it happening in an Obama administration,however.


0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:32 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cyclop I posted the platform. Show me where there is any anti-Americanism in it. Show me that Todd Palin supported the founder or joined when the AIP was first organized. (The party was founded in 1967. He joined in 1995. It had become a much different animal by that time.) Then you might have an argument. Otherwise, it seems to me that the AIP at this time is just another Independent Party, probably opposed to the GOP and Democrats, but perfectly respectable.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:36 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

Cyclop I posted the platform. Show me where there is any anti-Americanism in it. Show me that Todd Palin supported the founder or joined when the AIP was first organized. Then you might have an argument. Otherwise, it seems to me that the AIP is just another Independent Party, probably opposed to the GOP and Democrats, but otherwise perfectly respectable.


Fox, do you even realize that AIP stands for the Alaskan Independence party, not independent party? The two words are significantly different. So don't give me that crap about them being just a bunch of political independents.

It doesn't matter at what point Palin joined, it's a radical, anti-American organization dedicated to getting AK out of America. It doesn't matter one whit what they post on their platform... I mean, let's look at the goals of the AIP:

Quote:
Until we as Alaskans receive our Ultimate Goal, the AIP will continue to strive to make Alaska a better place to live with less government interference in our everyday lives.


The Alaskan Independence Party's goal is the vote we were entitled to in 1958, one choice from among the following four alternatives:

1) Remain a Territory.
2) Become a separate and Independent Nation.
3) Accept Commonwealth status.
4) Become a State.

The call for this vote is in furtherance of the dream of the Alaskan Independence Party's founding father, Joe Vogler, which was for Alaskans to achieve independence under a minimal government, fully responsive to the people, promoting a peaceful and lawful means of resolving differences.


It's 100% fair to say that when you join an organization, you support the ideas of the founder. That's like you claiming that people who join AQ don't really support Bin Laden. The whole purpose of the AIP is to get a vote, in order to get AK out of the US and to return the federal property there to the state.

You didn't respond to your error about Palin's political mentor; who most certainly did join during the formative days of that party. She got her political training from an anti-American radical. Please respond to this point.

Cycloptichorn
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:39 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:

Cyclop I posted the platform. Show me where there is any anti-Americanism in it. Show me that Todd Palin supported the founder or joined when the AIP was first organized. Then you might have an argument. Otherwise, it seems to me that the AIP is just another Independent Party, probably opposed to the GOP and Democrats, but otherwise perfectly respectable.


Fox, do you even realize that AIP stands for the Alaskan Independence party, not independent party? The two words are significantly different. So don't give me that crap about them being just a bunch of political independents.

It doesn't matter at what point Palin joined, it's a radical, anti-American organization dedicated to getting AK out of America. It doesn't matter one whit what they post on their platform... I mean, let's look at the goals of the AIP:

Quote:
Until we as Alaskans receive our Ultimate Goal, the AIP will continue to strive to make Alaska a better place to live with less government interference in our everyday lives.


The Alaskan Independence Party's goal is the vote we were entitled to in 1958, one choice from among the following four alternatives:

1) Remain a Territory.
2) Become a separate and Independent Nation.
3) Accept Commonwealth status.
4) Become a State.

The call for this vote is in furtherance of the dream of the Alaskan Independence Party's founding father, Joe Vogler, which was for Alaskans to achieve independence under a minimal government, fully responsive to the people, promoting a peaceful and lawful means of resolving differences.


It's 100% fair to say that when you join an organization, you support the ideas of the founder. That's like you claiming that people who join AQ don't really support Bin Laden. The whole purpose of the AIP is to get a vote, in order to get AK out of the US and to return the federal property there to the state.

You didn't respond to your error about Palin's political mentor; who most certainly did join during the formative days of that party. She got her political training from an anti-American radical. Please respond to this point.

Cycloptichorn


Please show a credible source that isn't an unsourced smear from a leftwing blog for your point, and I'll respond to it.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:40 pm
@Foxfyre,
Are you claiming that Newsweek is not a credible source, Fox? I already linked to their piece when I initially pointed out your error.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:41 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
Cyclop I posted the platform. Show me where there is any anti-Americanism in it.


It probably depends how you define anti-Americanism. There seems to exist a good amount of disdain for the United States throughout the proclamations of the AIP. I'll give you an example from the FAQ of the party (about what would happen after Alaska became independent):

Quote:
Q: Would I lose my U.S. citizenship?

A: Depending on the form of independence, several forms of citizenship would be possible, including the retention of U.S. citizenship or dual citizenship. However, considering the moral, educational, and economic decay of the U.S., Alaskans' who hold themselves to a higher standard might very well decide to at least maintain an arm's length distance from a country in decline.


You may not agree that calling the United States "a country in decline" or talking about the " the moral, educational, and economic decay of the U.S." is anti-American, or that their proposed solution of breaking away from the United States is radical. That's probably in the eye of the beholder.


Quote:
Show me that Todd Palin supported the founder or joined when the AIP was first organized. Then you might have an argument.


Not according to your standard. After all, you criticize Obama for merely being a member of the same board as Ayers. Obama never supported Ayers, or his ideas of a couple of decades ago.

According to your statement just here, you don't have an argument.


Quote:
Otherwise, it seems to me that the AIP is just another Independent Party, probably opposed to the GOP and Democrats, but otherwise perfectly respectable.


Secession from the Union or the idea of becoming an independent nation or maybe joining Canada is certainly perfectly respectable.
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:43 pm
@Foxfyre,
I also would like to point out:

Quote:
The party was founded in 1967. He joined in 1995. It had become a much different animal by that time.


Fox, C'mon. Who do you think was the head of the AIP in the 1990's? Joe Vogeler, the same guy who founded it. It wasn't a 'different animal.' It was ran by the same anti-American guy.

Cycloptichorn
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:46 pm
@old europe,
Fox's double-standard meme is only obvious to her readers, and completely void in her own brain.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 12:54 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

I also would like to point out:

Quote:
The party was founded in 1967. He joined in 1995. It had become a much different animal by that time.


Fox, C'mon. Who do you think was the head of the AIP in the 1990's? Joe Vogeler, the same guy who founded it. It wasn't a 'different animal.' It was ran by the same anti-American guy.

Cycloptichorn


Again show me a source. The only thing I've seen posted by you was a smear piece from Salon that I didn't read.

And since you accept that but won't accept with the AIP says about themselves or posts on their website or what the actual history is, you probably won't believe this press release also posted on the AIP website:

Quote:
UPDATE September 3, 2008 Noon ADT
It has been brought to our attention that there is a COUNTERFEIT SITE now up on the net. This site is a FRAUD and has infringed our copyright. We are presently seeking legal recourse.

Contrary to initial reports, Vice-President candidate Governor Sarah Palin was never a member of our party. We stand corrected. We issued a press release today. It is posted here to those members of the media who did not recieve it.

Todd Palin was registered as a member but never participated in any party activities aside from attending a convention in Wasilla at one time.

We had several hundred people attend that convention and nothing of noteworthy status took place outside of nominating the most conservative candidate up to that date to ever run for Governor of Alaska. That candidate was the sitting Lt. Governor, Jack Coghill. This man was one of the authors and signers of the Constitution of the State of Alaska.


It is on the counterfeit site where Joe Vogler quotes are featured by the way.
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 01:02 pm
@Foxfyre,
Oh the link to that press release and the real AIP website is here:
http://www.akip.org/

(Also I got the date wrong on the date the party was founded. It was organized in the 1970's, not 1960's, and became a recognized party in the mid 1980's.)

Now, I have argued a defense of an accusation with Sarah Palin with some substance. I wonder if Obama supporters can do the same re some of the more nefarious characters named as his associates?
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 01:04 pm
@old europe,
The American Independence Party (AIP) wrote:
Depending on the form of independence, several forms of citizenship would be possible, including the retention of U.S. citizenship or dual citizenship. However, considering the moral, educational, and economic decay of the U.S., Alaskans' who hold themselves to a higher standard might very well decide to at least maintain an arm's length distance from a country in decline.


The AIP, in substance and effect, called the United States a rotting corpse.

Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 01:05 pm
@Debra Law,
Please provide a link Debra. We already know two websites exist that look identical but one is real and one is a counterfeit designed specifically to smear Sarah Palin. You'll need more than something made up by some hateful person to convince me that the AIP is some subversive radical organization.
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 01:09 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
Please provide a link Debra. We already know two websites exist that look identical but one is real and one is a counterfeit designed specifically to smear Sarah Palin. You'll need more than something made up by some hateful person to convince me that the AIP is some subversive radical organization.


It's from the FAQ page of the Alaskan Independence Party.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 01:13 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
You'll need more than something made up by some hateful person to convince me that the AIP is some subversive radical organization.


Funny, by the way. You seem to say that the quoted part is "something made up by some hateful person", something designed to convince you that the Alaskan Independence Party is a "subversive radical organization".

As the quoted part comes right from the party's own website - do you stand by your statement? Or do you change your opinion that this stuff was written by some "hateful person" and that it paints the AIP as a "subversive radical organization"?
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 01:23 pm
@old europe,
oe, When you have to explain any organization's charter to the likes of Fox, you're wasting your time. Their imagination and mental blocks sees what they want to see.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 01:24 pm
@old europe,
Show me where it comes from their website. Remember there are two websites--a counterfeit and the real deal. The internet trolls have manipulated Google to insure that the counterfeit one comes to the top. Just another example of the noble Obama supporters ethical tactics I guess.

The most subversive thing I found on the website was this:
Goals
Quote:
Until we as Alaskans receive our Ultimate Goal, the AIP will continue to strive to make Alaska a better place to live with less government interference in our everyday lives.

The Alaskan Independence Party's goal is the vote we were entitled to in 1958, one choice from among the following four alternatives:
1) Remain a Territory.
2) Become a separate and Independent Nation.
3) Accept Commonwealth status.
4) Become a State.
The call for this vote is in furtherance of the dream of the Alaskan Independence Party's founding father, Joe Vogler, which was for Alaskans to achieve independence under a minimal government, fully responsive to the people, promoting a peaceful and lawful means of resolving differences.


And yet their platform leads with allegiance to the U.S. Constitution and no effort has been made to encourage the Alaska legislature to consider succession.

There is no indicaton that Sarah or Mr. Palin even knew this was part of the persona of the Party. It could explain why Sarah never joined and her husband never became active. I dunno.

I'm not speaking in favor of the AIP. I just don't see anything especially sinister or subversive there; just people who don't like the way the USA is going much and think they could do it better themselves.

Obama is running on the exact same principle; he just wants the power to run things instead of adopting a live and let live point of view.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 01:28 pm
@Foxfyre,
Fox, refute this from CBS News:

Quote:
The Alaska Independence Party
By Steve Benen

Sep 2, 2008

THE ALASKA INDEPENDENCE PARTY.... What may prove to be the single most damaging angle to Sarah Palin's role on the Republican Party ticket? There are quite a few contenders (ethics scandal, earmarks, inexperience, outside-the-mainstream views), but following up on Hilzoy's item from last night, Palin's association with the Alaska Independence Party might be the most politically detrimental.

It's practically impossible to make a "Country First" argument when your running mate is affiliated with a political party that puts country second.

Officials of the Alaskan Independence Party say that Palin was once so independent, she was once a member of their party, which since the 1970s has been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can secede from the United States.And while McCain's motto -- as seen in a new TV ad -- is "Country First," the AIP's motto is the exact opposite -- "Alaska First -- Alaska Always."

Lynette Clark, the chairman of the AIP, tells ABC News that Palin and her husband Todd were members in 1994, even attending the 1994 statewide convention in Wasilla. Clark was AIP secretary at the time.

"We are a state's rights party," Clark -- a self-employed goldminer -- tells ABC News. The AIP has "a plank that challenges the legality of the Alaskan statehood vote as illegal and in violation of United Nations charter and international law."
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2008 01:29 pm
@Foxfyre,
Good heavens, Foxfyre. Just click on the link on the party's website - you give the link to their homepage yourself.

http://i36.tinypic.com/k03cyx.jpg
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 11/26/2024 at 10:38:53