blueflame1
 
  1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2008 04:42 pm
@High Seas,
Here's some more godawful nonsense for you, "Parker: White House Officials Agree That Palin Should Be Off GOP Ticket»"
Last month, conservative columnist Kathleen Parker wrote a scathing column saying that Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) is “way out of her league” as the GOP’s vice presidential candidate and called on the Alaska governor to “bow out” of the race in order to “save McCain, her party, and the country she loves.”

Parker has subsequently noted angry responses from conservatives around the country. “To the GOP base, predictably, I’m a traitor,” Parker wrote.

Last night on the Colbert Report, Parker reiterated her belief that Palin is not qualified for the GOP ticket, but she also revealed that some White House officials have told her that they secretly agree:

COLBERT: Now but you said you got emails from people in the White House who secretively "

PARKER: Did I say that?

COLBERT: Yes you did. You said you secretly got emails from people in the White House but you wouldn’t name who they were, who said that they agreed with you.

PARKER: That’s correct.

Watch it (starting at 2:06)
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/14/parker-palin-white-house/
Indeed, Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) choice of Palin as his running mate has stirred the conservative establishment. New York Times columnist David Brooks has said that Palin is “a fatal cancer” on the GOP and said he prefers someone “who’s read a few more books.”

After calling the race “over” in response to Palin’s selection, Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan has offered only tepid praise of Palin, saying she mainly shows a “great and natural competence about the show business of politics.”

Responding to Palin’s critics on the right, McCain said, “Now if there’s a Georgetown cocktail party person who quote calls himself a conservative and doesn’t like her, good luck, good luck, fine.”
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2008 04:45 pm
@blueflame1,
Hey, blueflame, haven't you heard? Palin is a Obama plant for the McCain team.

No other reason makes any sense. Better than all the "intelligence" departments of the US. I think it's called "shock and awe."
blueflame1
 
  1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2008 05:00 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I thought McCain was the plant. Palin is just one piece of evidence of that.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2008 05:31 pm
@blueflame1,
Hadn't thought of that; but it does make some sense. Palin is more popular than McCain, and it's because she has lipstick. Can't be much else; not even a dumb blond (insult to them).
JTT
 
  1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2008 09:39 pm
I think the drill drill drill gang are gonna wanna drill drill drill the energy expert, Sarah. Who's your momma lookin' out for now, boys? I guess Sarah figured no sense in sending the gas south when Alaska was gonna secede from the union anyway.

Quote:

Palin Opposed Plan To Bring Alaska’s Natural Gas To The Lower 48 States

Actually, last year, Palin opposed a plan to bring Alaska’s natural gas to the lower 48 states. This past summer, the Department of Energy issued an order allowing ConocoPhillips and Marathon Oil to to export 98.1 billion cubic feet of Alaskan natural gas " roughly the amount of natural gas used by 1.4 million families " to Asia. This had been the practice since 1969, since there were few alternatives to exporting.

However, as Time reports, “since this past May, some of Alaska’s gas could have wound up in domestic hands.” Sempra Energy opened the first Liquified Natural Gas terminal on the West Coast of North America. The facility “is tied directly to the gas pipeline system that leads to California, Texas and Arizona.” However, Palin intervened with the DOE in April 2007, asking it to approve Conoco/Marathon’s exports to Asia:

She asked DOE to condition its approval on guarantees that gas needed in Alaska not be diverted to the better-paying foreign venues " a position she held until this past January, when the producers reached separate agreement with the state to meet its needs.

At no time did Palin or her government cite the desire to preserve Alaskan gas for the lower 48 states. The Sempra terminal began operations just four months after Palin announced unconditional support for the Marathon and ConocoPhillips request and a month before DOE approved their plans to export gas to Asia.

As one of America’s top energy experts, Palin should have known about the Sempra project, which was “well-known and much anticipated in energy circles.”

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/14/palin-wyden-energy/

0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2008 10:47 pm
guardian.co.uk

VP for vendetta

Quote:

The Troopergate report suggests how Sarah Palin would govern the US: by abusing her power to settle personal grudges

Michelle Goldberg
October 14, 2008

When I was in Alaska last month, several people told me they were afraid to speak about Sarah Palin on the record, lest they invite retaliation from the governor's office or, God forbid, from the next vice-president. At the time, I didn't take such worries too seriously. As abominable a candidate as Palin is, it was hard for me to imagine vice-presidential staffers trying ruin the lives of private Wasilla citizens just because they had displeased her. But reading the official report of the investigation into the Palin abuse-of-power scandal known as Troopergate, it seems that perhaps her critics were being more prudent than paranoid.

As scandals go, Troopergate is absurdly picayune. According to the report, released Friday by the bipartisan legislative council that authorised the investigation, Palin and her husband tried to use their political power to have her sister's ex-husband, state trooper Michael Wooten, fired from his job and investigated for workers compensation fraud. They also pressed authorities to prosecute him for a moose shooting that was unlawful because of a technicality (the permit had been issued to his then-wife, who was with him at the time, rather than to Wooten, who pulled the trigger). The governor then fired Walt Monegan, the public safety commissioner, because he refused to get rid of Wooten, something he could not legally have done. This stuff is so ridiculously small it seems silly to even be writing about it, especially at time of multiplying global emergencies.

Yet given that there is still a chance - albeit a diminishing one - that Palin could soon be in a position of national political power, it's worth looking at how she has exercised power in the past. As a window into how Palin might rule, Troopergate's very pettiness is what makes it so troubling. We're used to politicians who do favours for campaign contributors, who are too cozy with lobbyists and who resort to underhanded tactics against political foes. What we are not used to are politicians who use their offices to intervene in family quarrels and punish their relatives' personal enemies. For the last eight years, we've suffered under an administration that sees no difference between politics and governing. Palin is something arguably worse, a person who sees no difference between her private life and her public duties. Even Dick Cheney, after all, hasn't used his office to torment disfavoured former in-laws.

Though Palin claims the report has exonerated her, that's an outright lie. It is true that it concluded that she was within her rights to fire Monegan, since the governor is allowed to replace department heads without cause. But it also found that Palin "abused her power" by violating the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act, which holds that any "effort to benefit a personal or financial interest through official action" is a violation of the public trust.

More interesting than the report's conclusion, though, are its pitiful little details. There are endless haranguing phone calls to people throughout the bureaucracy demanding action against Wooten, even after the Palins are warned that their actions could get them in legal trouble. There are scenes of Todd Palin, who apparently spent a great deal of time working in no official capacity out of his wife's office, presenting Monegan with dirt on Wooten unearthed by a private investigator. We see Todd trying to bust his ex-brother-in- law for dropping his kids off at school and then at church in a patrol car (both times, it turns out Wooten had permission to use the vehicle for personal business). We learn that the judge presiding over Wooten's divorce from Palin's sister weighed the Palin family's vendetta against him in splitting up their assets, ruling that Wooten is likely to earn less in the future because his ex-wife's family "have decided to take off with the guy's livelihood".

This is not, of course, the only case in which Palin has behaved like Gossip Girl's Blair Waldorf, mobilising her minions against those who've fallen from her good graces. One of the people enlisted against Wooten was Palin's legislative director John Bitney, a friend of hers since junior high school. Bitney later angered Palin by having an affair with Debbie Richter, who at the time was separated from Todd Palin's best friend. He was summarily fired. (Debbie Richter has since become Debbie Bitney).

All this is, of course, pretty trivial stuff. But how terrifying to think of a vice-president - or a president - wielding the power of her office to settle such personal grudges. The Bush administration has famously been described as the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. Palin promises something tawdrier still. Again, bad prime-time soap operas offer the best analogy. Could America survive the rule of the Mayberry Carringtons?


LINK
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2008 11:00 pm
Anchorage Daily News Editorial

Palin vindicated?
Governor offers Orwellian spin


Quote:
Sarah Palin's reaction to the Legislature's Troopergate report
is an embarrassment to Alaskans and the nation....


Read the entire editorial here:
http://www.adn.com/opinion/view/story/555236.html




cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 15 Oct, 2008 11:00 am
@Debra Law,
The biggest problem is that McCain can't see the embarrassment he has caused our country by picking Palin. His senility knows no bounds.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Fri 17 Oct, 2008 01:51 pm
"Palin also made a point of mentioning that she loved to visit the "pro-America" areas of the country, of which North Carolina is one. No word on which states she views as unpatriotic."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 17 Oct, 2008 02:43 pm
@Debra Law,
You wouldn't know it by the support Palin is still getting in the lower-48, especially in the "low" lands of America and in Alaska.
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Mon 20 Oct, 2008 04:01 pm
@cicerone imposter,
CI and Blue:
Here's something to laugh about.
http://www.palinaspresident.us/
Just move your mouse, then click, especially the door!
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Tue 21 Oct, 2008 12:47 pm
Me fail civics? That's unpossible!
by Kagro X
Tue Oct 21, 2008 at 11:05:43 AM PDT
Take a look at a clip from another typically vapid and disastrous Sarah Palin television interview and see what it looks like when the reporter is actually uninterested in clarifications or follow ups. I guess that's what Palin has moved on to these days. Local affiliate interviews with reporters who won't ask anything hard.

But that doesn't actually mean Palin gives correct answers. Oh, no! Far from it! All it means is that the reporter asking the questions doesn't give any indication of being aware that the answers are incorrect.

Here's her answer to the last question she's asked. It's a doozy, and she has to b.s. her way through it. It came from a third grader, after all:

Q: Brandon Garcia wants to know, "What does the Vice President do?"

PALIN: Aw, that’s something that Piper would ask me, as a second grader, also. That's a great question, Brandon, and a Vice President has a really great job, because no only are they there to support the President agenda, they're like a team member, the team mate to that President. But also, they're in charge of the United States Senate, so if they want to they can really get in there with the Senators and make a lot of good policy changes that will make life better for Brandon and his family and his classroom. And it's a great job and I look forward to having that job.
video http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/21/123025/00/91/637578
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 21 Oct, 2008 02:54 pm
@blueflame1,
Palin failed her social studies classes, and now she's ready to be our veep, and god forbid, our president. Conservatives fail to see the connection.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Tue 21 Oct, 2008 07:13 pm
The Palin Effect: From Bad To Worse
by Marcus Baram HuffPost Reporting From DC
Two new polls provide further evidence of Sarah Palin's transformation over the course of two months from energy boost to major drawback and her rising unfavorability ratings present a real vulnerability for the McCain campaign.

In fact, her qualifications to be president "rank as voters' top concern about McCain's candidacy - ahead of continuing President Bush's policies, enacting economic policies that only benefit the rich and keeping too high of a troop presence in Iraq," according to a new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll.

Fifty-five percent of respondents say Palin is not qualified to serve as president, five points higher than their previous poll.

In addition, for the first time, more voters have a negative opinion of her than a positive one. In the survey, 47 percent view her negatively, versus 38 percent who see her in a positive light.
That's a striking shift since McCain chose Palin as his running mate in early September, when she held a 47 to 27 percent positive rating.


According to a new poll from the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, opinions of Palin have flipped in the last month, especially among the female voters she was expected to attract to the McCain ticket.

Almost half - 49% - of voters have an unfavorable opinion of her while 44% have a favorable view. A month ago, "favorable opinions of Palin outnumbered negative ones by 54% to 32%," according to the poll.

Women, especially women under age 50, have become increasingly critical of Palin: 60% now express an unfavorable view of Palin, up from 36% in mid-September. Notably, opinions of Palin have a greater impact on voting intentions than do opinions of Joe Biden, Obama's running mate.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  2  
Wed 22 Oct, 2008 03:04 pm
I have a feeling that this will have a negative effect on views of Palin.

From Times OnlineOctober 22, 2008

Republicans spent $150,000 on Sarah Palin's clothes

Jenny Booth
The Republican Party has spent $150,000 in upmarket designer stores on dressing Sarah Palin for the part of vice-president.

During September, more than $75,000 was spent in a single shopping spree at Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, and another $9,500 at Macy's in the same city - scene of the Republican party convention where John McCain introduced Ms Palin as his running mate. Another $5,000 was spent at Atelier, a classy men's boutique, suggesting that Ms Palin's husband Todd, jocularly known in Alaska as the First Dude, may also have come in for some sprucing up.

Later in the month $50,000 was spent in forays into Saks Fifth Avenue in New York and St Louis, on a procession of neat little waisted jackets, pencil skirts, killer boots and patent heels that have enabled Ms Palin to appear in at least one, and sometimes two or three, new outfits a day.

The party also spent nearly $5,000 on hair and makeup.


The figures have emerged from the Republicans' monthly financial disclosure report for September, listed under a new heading of "campaign accessories".

Since Ms Palin was unveiled as Mr McCain's choice for Vice President on August 29, the Governor of Alaska - a former beauty queen contestant - seems not to have been photographed in the same outfit twice.

Red has emerged as a key colour, worn at upbeat moments in such guises as a red leather jacket with a clinging short black skirt, and a tight red suit with a ribbon under the bust.

In the days around October 10, however, when the Troopergate scandal resurfaced to tarnish Ms Palin's image, she was photographed in much more serious outfits, each a tailored ensemble in sombre, sensible black and grey.

Mrs Palin has had a few fashion howlers, such as her foray into peach satin on August 30, a fussy and unflattering white tie-fronted jacket on October 6, and a hideous shiny brown jacket on October 15. She has also several times repeated the fashion faux pas of teaming white tops with black skirts, making her look like a waitress.

Mainly, however, she has stuck with a tried and tested formula of short tailored suits, with skirt levels always above the knee.

News photographers have responded with a huge volume of generally flattering pictures, some of which look more like catwalk images than political portraiture.

There were reports earlier this month that she had been working with a team of stylists and a voice coach on refining her image. What did not emerge until today was the scale of the outlay, believed to be unprecedented in the annals of American presidential campaigning.

Male candidates have in the past come in for severe ribbing over much smaller sums, such as Democratic contender John Edwards's $400 haircuts and Mr McCain's $500 Ferragamo shoes.

The Republican Party has tried to play down the extraordinary sum it has spent on packaging Ms Palin.

"With all of the important issues facing the country right now, it's remarkable that we're spending time talking about pantsuits and blouses," said Tracey Schmitt, a party spokeswoman.

"It was always the intent that the clothing go to a charitable purpose after the campaign."

Maria Comella, another spokeswoman, declined to say whether it was necessary to spend $5,000 a day on clothes for Ms Palin.

"The campaign does not comment on strategic decisions regarding how financial resources available to the campaign are spent," said Ms Comella, in a statement to the US political website Politico which first noticed the coyly named entry in the Republicans' accounts.

The Republicans have declined to say whether the shopping sprees have continued into October. Disclosure of their campaign accounts for this month is not expected until after the presidential election is over.

0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Thu 23 Oct, 2008 09:12 am
Flash! Sarah Palin divorces her spouse and marries Joe the Plumber.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Thu 23 Oct, 2008 11:20 am
hahaha. http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/1/O/2/vice-presidential-lk1016d.jpg
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Thu 23 Oct, 2008 07:16 pm
McCain speaking out against using campaigning financing for personal things like clothes, back in '93 when he was still a good politician and stood for decent principles at least (bolding added by the author): http://talk.theknot.com/boards/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=57135404&forumid=47&MsdVisit=1


McCain on Palin's "Slush Fund"

Let's pretend we have a time machine. And let us travel back in time to visit wise words from the John McCain of old. Let's travel back to May 25, 1993, specifically, when the old John McCain stood on the floor of the Senate and presented the following eloquent condemnation of the abuse of campaign funds (PDF):

E>
Mr. McCAIN. Madam President, the amendment before the Senate is a very simple one. It restricts the use of campaign funds for inherently personal purposes. The amendment would restrict individuals from using campaign funds for such things as home mortgage payments, clothing purchases, noncampaign automobile expenses, country club memberships, and vacations or other trips that are noncampaign in nature.

Madam President, I want to emphasize I will be citing some examples of how campaign funds have been used which are extremely egregious, but I want to point out they are not illegal, and the purpose of this amendment is to restrict the use of those campaign funds because, if we are truly going to have campaign finance reform, I do not believe that campaign funds should be used for such things as country club dues, tuxedos, vacations, and other purposes for which they are now almost routinely used by certain Members of both bodies.

I point out that Senators and Members of Congress currently earn $139,000 a year, which means that Members of Congress are in the top 1 percent of wage earners in the country. So let there be no mistake, Members of Congress do earn a good wage, a wage that does not leave them poor.

I think it is worth contrasting a Member's salary and perks with that of a typical American family.

According to the U.S. census, in 1990 the median family income in America was $30,056. With that $30,056, the average American family was expected to put a roof over their head, feed their children, and send them to school. It seems to me that we should be able to survive as well at a salary level of $139,000 per year. [ed. note: Sarah Palin's salary as Governor of Alaska is $125,000 per year]

The use of campaign funds for items which most Americans would consider to be strictly personal reasons, in my view, erodes public confidence and erodes it significantly.
PDF of McCAin presenting amendment page 16 http://dailykos.com/images/user/28416/McCain_on_Personal_Expenses_II.pdf
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Fri 24 Oct, 2008 07:07 am
So, Governor, how are you?
Quote:
ABC News’ Kate Snow Reports: After Governor Sarah Palin said it would be “fine” to release her medical records in an interview Wednesday, the McCain-Palin campaign is feeling no sense of urgency about actually releasing any records.

Spokeswoman Maria Comella told ABC News on Thursday: “When medical information related to Governor Palin’s health is ready to be released we will make that information available.”

NBC’s Brian Williams had asked Palin in an interview that aired Wednesday, “Did I hear you just agree to release your medical records?"

Palin replied: "The medical records. So be it. If that will allow some curiosity seekers, perhaps, to have one more thing that they can either check the box off that they can find something to criticize, perhaps, or find something to rest them assured over. Fine. I'm healthy, I'm happy, had five kids. That is going to be in the medical records. Never been seriously ill or hurt. You will see that in the medical records if they're released."

Comella declined to give any more information about when the records might be released or whether there were any particular issues holding up their release.


What do you think those records will show the Governor doing on the day Trig Palin came into the world?

Joe(Visiting the maternity ward but not as a patient?)Nation


Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 24 Oct, 2008 10:13 am
@Joe Nation,
The hospital where the kid was supposedly born has no record of him being born there that day, nor has any witness come forwards saying that she was in fact there at the hospital that day.

Just sayin'

Cycloptichorn
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » McCain's VP:
  3. » Page 93
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.22 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 02:58:19