I'm sorry, but this does absolutely nothing for me.
@maporsche,
Nah, it's a good argument spelled right or not.
The more I think about it, the happier I am with McCain's choice. Truly. For I don't think she will have much affect at all in the long run, and I think that he opens himself up to some problems by picking her. He basically just negated his major argument against Obama, something which will not go unnoticed; she is not very attractive to moderate voters (at least in her positions); and I don't know how well she will match up with Biden. And most importantly, I think this scandal that she's tied up in is going to receive a large injection of national attention, and that has a way of changing things, doesn't it?
It's a long shot by McCain and yaknow what? It's good when your opponent is forced to take long shots. It's really good.
Cycloptichorn
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
.................
It's a long shot by McCain and yaknow what? It's good when your opponent is forced to take long shots. It's really good.
Cycloptichorn
Cycl - what is the origin of this alleged military doctrine of long shots?
@gustavratzenhofer,
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
I'm sorry, but this does absolutely nothing for me.
She's got it going on....no doubt.
I'm hot for teacher.
@High Seas,
A lifetime of experience watching both politics, and football
It's a sign of weakness on McCain's part. And a weak pick overall. How long do you think it will be before we have the guy she had fired in a commercial? When the national reporters start snooping around, you really think more details about her investigation and scandal aren't going to come out?
Risky, risky...
Cycloptichorn
@edgarblythe,
ROFL
This is such a McCain boner, there is nothing left to do but poke fun.
ROFL
@ehBeth,
Quote:The 'wackjobs' tend to show up with their votes.
Very true. Hopefully the young voters show up in droves to cancel them out.
@Cycloptichorn,
"And surely we can agree that if the McCain campaign was desperate to transparently court voters put off by Hillary Clinton's loss, there is no dearth of women with far greater intellectual, executive, and political abilities--abilities that would allow them to assume the presidency in a heartbeat."
--Peter Scoblic
This is precisely the sentiment that Mr B (a McCain supporter to date) expressed while listening to Ms Palin today.
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
A lifetime of experience watching both politics, and football
..........
Still not enough experience since you conflate a "long shot" and a "Hail Mary pass"! Have a good weekend.
@High Seas,
I've seen that idea elsewhere, specifically in terms of Mondale and Ferraro. He was behind, he knew it, he tried something big and bold and attention-getting -- didn't work out too well for him.
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:It sways them to show that McCain is not a male chauvinist pig like Barack Obama, considering the disgraceful, humiliating way that Barack treated Hillary.
Where does this demented point of view come from? What was disgraceful? What was humiliating? Being the candidate (while being male) that Americans narrowly liked better makes him a male chauvinist pig? Explain this bout with idiocy or let it stand as the simple bout with idiocy that it is.
@Ticomaya,
Well, she's no Eric Cantor, that's for sure
Cycloptichorn
My take, for what it's worth:
1. Who? ... Oh. But she's only been a governor for less than two years.
2. She has a down syndrom baby. Before you take that as sexist or discriminatory, hear me out. A baby requires a lot of attention. A handicapped baby requires even more. She is comfortable with having her husband be home with the baby and taking care of the house. That is a rather liberal stance, seeing women as equals at work and a man as a man even if he's wearing an apron, no? CERTAINLY NOT far right, christian conservative values. So, I'm missing where she draws votes from christians, conservative women or men.
3. Along the same line of thinking, she doesn't garner the support or self identification from stay at home moms. How can she understand them?
4. This one may seem petty, but plays to peoples visual perceptions... Her hair style (and Cindy's) is right out of 1965. Progressive women, Hillary's Traveling Pantsuit group, will NOT vote for someone that looks like she will set women back 50 years.
5. Her stance on abortion rights will not draw Hillary, moderate or left votes.
6. She doesn't draw any minority votes I can think of... black, hispanic, cuban, etc.
7. She may be a lifetime member of the NRA, but you can believe there is a large population of guys out there (that identify with McCain), who think "...for the love of God, the womans s'posed to cook the meat not hunt it down!" Those that think it's sexy for her to shoot a gun, also want to pat her on the butt and send her back to the kitchen, NOT to the White House.
8. McCain is 72, and had two rounds with cancer. I can't imagine her being ready to be president if, godforbid, something happened to McCain on January 22nd, 2009, or any time in the first couple of years. At least Obama knows the heads of other countries. Hell, he had one of King Abdullah personally drive him to the airport.
That gets most of my initial impressions. I really don't get the selection of her for VP unless McCains realizing he doesn't really have it in him to be president but has to keep going through the motions since it is so late in the game.
@squinney,
Good post Squinney.
But, uh-oh. I just heard something very troubling: Palin has invoked Alaska's version of Executive priviledge in order to keep emails relating to her abuse of power investigation out of the hands of investigators.
...
Now, who does that sound like to you?
Bad, bad choice McCain. There's a reason you actually vet someone before you choose them. We are going to have a field day with this.
Cycloptichorn
@JPB,
The GOP seems to think women will eagerly vote for any ticket that includes a member of their gender. That's Republican tokenism and pandering at its worst.
Palin's addition to the ticket takes Republican faux-feminism to a whole new level. As Adam Serwer pointed out on TAPPED, this is in fact a condescending move by the GOP. It plays to the assumption that disaffected Hillary Clinton supporters did not care about her politics -- only her gender. In picking Palin, Republicans are lending credence to the sexist assumption that women voters are too stupid to investigate or care about the issues, and merely want to vote for someone who looks like them. As Serwer noted, it's akin to choosing Alan Keyes in an attempt to compete with Obama for votes from black Americans.
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=mccains_sexist_vp_pick
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:Well, she's no Eric Cantor, that's for sure
Cycloptichorn
No, she's not, but I'm pleased with his selection nonetheless.