@FreeDuck,
I agree.
One other thing I thought of recently... we're hearing a lot about that, how McCain stepped on Obama's convention speech et al, and it's true. But a record-setting number of people SAW that speech, first-hand. The stepping-on really counts in terms of filters -- people finding out about it who didn't see it themselves. And while there wasn't a lot of positive coverage of the speech/ convention once the Palin choice came out, what coverage I did see was positive -- and I don't think there was much
negative coverage.
Often there is the post-speech dissections, trying to point out contradictions or fudges or he was for it before he was against it or whatever. That didn't happen either.
So you have some 40 million people who saw Obama's speech live -- and then haven't had their impressions of Obama's speech messed with. THAT might turn out to be a real positive. It was a speech that was really well received by a lot of people. (As far as I can tell, the least-positive responses are from major Obama supporters, who liked it fine but had seen much of it before. It seemed to go over really well with undecideds and those who were less familiar with him. And every media report I saw about it was positive.)