McCain is blowing his election chances.

So....do Obama supporters want Obama to go negative now? Is that what I'm hearing?

maporsche wrote:

So....do Obama supporters want Obama to go negative now? Is that what I'm hearing?

Uh...no.

real life wrote:

Great cartoon. I'll set it as my desktop background.

So that's how you memorize these really long memes. I knew there had to be a trick to it considering your lot's grasp of things. And here I thought it was just mindless droning.

snood wrote:

maporsche wrote:

So....do Obama supporters want Obama to go negative now? Is that what I'm hearing?

Uh...no.

what would be the consequences if he did?

JTT wrote:

real life wrote:

Great cartoon. I'll set it as my desktop background.

So that's how you memorize these really long memes. I knew there had to be a trick to it considering your lot's grasp of things. And here I thought it was just mindless droning.

That's one reason I could never be a liberal. They take themselves WAAAAY too seriously.

snood wrote:

maporsche wrote:

So....do Obama supporters want Obama to go negative now? Is that what I'm hearing?

Uh...no.

what would be the consequences if he did?

real life wrote:

JTT wrote:

real life wrote:

Great cartoon. I'll set it as my desktop background.

So that's how you memorize these really long memes. I knew there had to be a trick to it considering your lot's grasp of things. And here I thought it was just mindless droning.

That's one reason I could never be a liberal. They take themselves WAAAAY too seriously.

That's funny, "real life". Self-righteous prig makes sweeping and ironic generalization. You're a funny guy.

snood wrote:

real life wrote:

JTT wrote:

real life wrote:

Great cartoon. I'll set it as my desktop background.

So that's how you memorize these really long memes. I knew there had to be a trick to it considering your lot's grasp of things. And here I thought it was just mindless droning.

That's one reason I could never be a liberal. They take themselves WAAAAY too seriously.

That's funny, "real life". Self-righteous prig makes sweeping and ironic generalization. You're a funny guy.

You've done nothing to dispel the notion, I must say.

...but no criticism for McArcane so clearly reneging on his "respectful campaign that never questions opponents' patriotism" from you stalwart keepers of the objectivity flame, eh?

The war in Iraq "is lost" and a US troop surge is failing to bring peace to the country, the leader of the Democratic majority in the US Congress, Harry Reid, said Thursday.
"I believe ... that this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme violence in Iraq this week," Reid told journalists.

"They both want to keep us tied to another country's civil war, a war we cannot win," she said. "That in a nutshell is the Bush/McCain Iraq policy. Don't learn from your mistakes, repeat them."


She said if elected she would convene military advisers and ask them to develop a plan to begin bringing U.S. troops home within 60 days of her taking office next January.

snood wrote:

...but no criticism for McArcane so clearly reneging on his "respectful campaign that never questions opponents' patriotism" from you stalwart keepers of the objectivity flame, eh?

If he made that claim, I think he should renege on it.

Well, don't you keep abreast of the issues. And such an honorable person you are, agreeing McCain should do exactly what would be expected of him as a conservative/Republican.


I think the patriotism of many on the left SHOULD be doubted, publicly and loudly

Isn't this a laugh! The left questions the lies, the corruption, the war crimes but real life provides active support for these and he has the nerve to question anyone's patriotism. AMAZING!

Quote:

The war in Iraq "is lost" and a US troop surge is failing to bring peace to the country, the leader of the Democratic majority in the US Congress, Harry Reid, said Thursday.
"I believe ... that this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme violence in Iraq this week," Reid told journalists.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070419184534.ileoeb47&show_article=1

Harry Reid, leader of the Senate, is heavily invested in America's military defeat, advising us in effect to give up.

Quote:

"They both want to keep us tied to another country's civil war, a war we cannot win," she said. "That in a nutshell is the Bush/McCain Iraq policy. Don't learn from your mistakes, repeat them."


She said if elected she would convene military advisers and ask them to develop a plan to begin bringing U.S. troops home within 60 days of her taking office next January.

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Hillary_cant_win_Iraq/2008/03/17/80999.html

Hillary Clinton, also heavily invested in defeat, laments that it costs too much to win and promises a swift pullout.

I have never seen any Obama supporter admit that ANY analysis of his positions, that finds fault with his positions, is an objective report.
Have you? [..]

On the other hand, I can say the same thing about McCain supporters.

mysteryman wrote:

I have never seen any Obama supporter admit that ANY analysis of his positions, that finds fault with his positions, is an objective report.
Have you? [..]

On the other hand, I can say the same thing about McCain supporters.

Yes, we all know that Obama supporters are viscerally unable to make, or even countenance, any criticism of the man or his positions. Whereas McCain supporters are always willing to acknowledge objective criticisms of their guy.

This, of course, explains why a thread that invited Obama supporters to explain which parts of his program or politics they disagree with, yielded 12 pages full of explanations by "Obamaites" of where they differed and disagreed with their candidate, while a similar thread for McCain supporters resulted mostly in ...

<crickets>

oh come on Nimh, that's hardly fair. Any McCain thread rapidly devolves into some kind of insult match as too many opponents here can find nothing else to do but throw insults around or belittle whatever reasoning provided.

If I thought I could actually make positive posts about McCain without a page of replies about how wrong I was or how stupid I was for thinking such I'd do it in a heartbeat.

I think "some" would have been appropriate Nimh. I mean look at BBB's defense of Edwards... slam McCain because he did the same thing... 20 years ago...

Fox, I don't think that's true either. We have our share of idiots who claim to be McCain supporters who have nothing better to do then to slam their opponents.

You were defeated before you started. You were unwelcome intruders who have savagely devastated a sovereign nation that was no threat to you or anyone. You continue to lie and support lies regarding this issue ......