FREEDOM MARCHES ON !!!

Full agreement with you on this point. I too feel that an armed citizenry is a deterrent against crime, and I lean liberal on most subjects, save this.

I thought this was a thread on french fries.

Well, Farmer, I can understand that some liberals
may not wish to become victims of crime.

simply stated, and quite correct

When guns are outlawed, only omsigdavid will have guns.

When alcohol was outlawed only OmSigDAVID had booze ?

You must have been quite popular.

Reminds me of 1951, when I was the only guy on the block
with a television set. Made me VERY popular.

Those who offended me during the day,
were denied access at 5PM, when broadcasting began.

This is your 4th thread on guns. Who are you trying to convince? I suggest you get some counselling to deal with this weird infatuation.

Who am I trying to convinve ??


As an integral n necessary part of the democratic process,
it behooves a citizen to convince as many of his fellow citizens
as possible of matters of concern, in this case, a matter
of existential importance, both in terms of providing for survival
of the depredations of criminals or animals,
and of keeping government in line (which was the concept of the Founders,
in putting sovereignty into the hands of the citizens,
having wrested it from from the hands of constituted authority).


If I rented space on placards on busses or subways,
wud u ask me who I wanna convince ?

The answer is: EVERYONE !!!!!!!!!

Everyone who wud desire to survive a violent confrontation.


I don't intend to stop posting, however hi the numbers get.

Omsigdavid has free alcohol?

faugh! I care not - I already have a hangover - and my own TV.....

And continue to ignore the reasons for having such a violent society. A society where the only way to deal with problems is violence. The seat of freedom, and yet the citizens are sh!t scared of their own government. Maybe the USA is not such model of democracy after all eh?

If that's freedom, you can have it. Thankfully, I'm 12 000 miles out of range of your weapons.

The desire to be successful in defending a violent confrontation
is not a "weird infatuation".

Your reasoning is very strange; one might say "liberal",
but I don't wish to use foul language on this forum.






P.S.

I wonder how u wud react, if such an emergency occurred
to one of your favorite people, in your presence.
Perhaps u'd improvise; maybe hit the predator with your shoe,
like Nikita Kruschev, or expectorate upon his person ??

In an emergency, one had better possess the necessary equipment.
Remember, EVEN IN PRISONS, criminals have secretly MADE their own guns.
THEY WILL arm themselves to whatever extent they wish,
but may freely remain HELPLESS, if u prefer.

Let the criminal have discretion as to whether your mother
or your child will live or die (if u so desire).

The way to deal with a violent attack of a criminal or
a pack of wolves, or a bear is better counter-violence.
Your life depends on your having more power.

As long as we r all armed, as the Founders intended,
we need not fear government. (u have a foul mouth.)

Democracy has nothing to do with this issue.
It is self defense, and keeping government within its constitutional limits.

1. It IS freedom.

2. We CAN have it; we will have it.

3. I care not at all whether U have any freedom; not my business.

4. We will not waste our ammunition on u.

What if he attacks your bears with his shoe?

Oh - sorry - I have become confused - what if he attacks your mother with Nikita Kruschev?

Dammit, I know that's not right...

When the unarmed n helpless Reginald Denny
was being stomped in L.A., on nationwide TV,
from sea to shining sea, for almost an hour,
when any kick cud have been his last,
with the police having fled the scene,

I wonder if Wilso wud have been willing to counsel him
on the delights of being helpless and unarmed.


I wonder if Mr. Wilso wud have been willing to counsel
Kitty Genovese, while she was being repeatedly stabbed (to death)
in the streets of Queens, NY City, for about an hour,
n told her how much better off she
was in being unarmed n helpless.

While 12 year old Polly Klass, was bound n kidnapped by
knife wielding Richard Davis, later to be raped n killed,
wud our good Mr. Wilso have whispered in her ear how much better off
she was, in being unarmed n helpless
so that Mr. Davis had unimpaired discretion as to whether to rape n murder her ?


Is that Mr. Wilso's idea of "democracy" ?