1
   

FREEDOM MARCHES ON !!!

 
 
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 01:08 pm
On September 11, the Missouri Senate joined the House
in voting to override Governor Bob Holden`s veto of
HB 349, making the "Show Me State" the nation`s 36th state
to pass a non-discriminatory Right to Carry Guns
(RTC) law. The veto of HB 349 was overridden in the
House by a vote of 115 to 39. The vote in the Senate
was 23 to 10. This marks only the seventh time in
Missouri history that legislators have successfully
overturned a governor`s veto.

Missouri joins Colorado, New Mexico, and Minnesota
as the fourth state this year to pass a "must issue" RTC law.



We need a statute for instruction in the public schools,
for all the public, in firearms safety n accuracy.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 5,904 • Replies: 132
No top replies

 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 06:38 pm
Full agreement with you on this point. I too feel that an armed citizenry is a deterrent against crime, and I lean liberal on most subjects, save this.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 06:49 pm
I thought this was a thread on french fries.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 06:57 pm
Well, Farmer, I can understand that some liberals
may not wish to become victims of crime.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 07:41 pm
simply stated, and quite correct
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 07:46 pm
When guns are outlawed, only omsigdavid will have guns.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 08:50 pm
When alcohol was outlawed only OmSigDAVID had booze ?
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 08:55 pm
You must have been quite popular.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 09:04 pm
Reminds me of 1951, when I was the only guy on the block
with a television set. Made me VERY popular.

Those who offended me during the day,
were denied access at 5PM, when broadcasting began.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 09:10 pm
This is your 4th thread on guns. Who are you trying to convince? I suggest you get some counselling to deal with this weird infatuation.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:11 pm
Who am I trying to convinve ??


As an integral n necessary part of the democratic process,
it behooves a citizen to convince as many of his fellow citizens
as possible of matters of concern, in this case, a matter
of existential importance, both in terms of providing for survival
of the depredations of criminals or animals,
and of keeping government in line (which was the concept of the Founders,
in putting sovereignty into the hands of the citizens,
having wrested it from from the hands of constituted authority).


If I rented space on placards on busses or subways,
wud u ask me who I wanna convince ?

The answer is: EVERYONE !!!!!!!!!

Everyone who wud desire to survive a violent confrontation.


I don't intend to stop posting, however hi the numbers get.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:15 pm
Omsigdavid has free alcohol?

faugh! I care not - I already have a hangover - and my own TV.....
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:17 pm
And continue to ignore the reasons for having such a violent society. A society where the only way to deal with problems is violence. The seat of freedom, and yet the citizens are sh!t scared of their own government. Maybe the USA is not such model of democracy after all eh?
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:19 pm
If that's freedom, you can have it. Thankfully, I'm 12 000 miles out of range of your weapons.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:25 pm
The desire to be successful in defending a violent confrontation
is not a "weird infatuation".

Your reasoning is very strange; one might say "liberal",
but I don't wish to use foul language on this forum.






P.S.

I wonder how u wud react, if such an emergency occurred
to one of your favorite people, in your presence.
Perhaps u'd improvise; maybe hit the predator with your shoe,
like Nikita Kruschev, or expectorate upon his person ??

In an emergency, one had better possess the necessary equipment.
Remember, EVEN IN PRISONS, criminals have secretly MADE their own guns.
THEY WILL arm themselves to whatever extent they wish,
but may freely remain HELPLESS, if u prefer.

Let the criminal have discretion as to whether your mother
or your child will live or die (if u so desire).
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:32 pm
Wilso wrote:
And continue to ignore the reasons for having such a violent society. A society where the only way to deal with problems is violence. The seat of freedom, and yet the citizens are sh!t scared of their own government. Maybe the USA is not such model of democracy after all eh?



The way to deal with a violent attack of a criminal or
a pack of wolves, or a bear is better counter-violence.
Your life depends on your having more power.

As long as we r all armed, as the Founders intended,
we need not fear government. (u have a foul mouth.)

Democracy has nothing to do with this issue.
It is self defense, and keeping government within its constitutional limits.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:36 pm
Wilso wrote:
If that's freedom, you can have it. Thankfully, I'm 12 000 miles out of range of your weapons.



1. It IS freedom.

2. We CAN have it; we will have it.

3. I care not at all whether U have any freedom; not my business.

4. We will not waste our ammunition on u.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:40 pm
What if he attacks your bears with his shoe?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:45 pm
Oh - sorry - I have become confused - what if he attacks your mother with Nikita Kruschev?

Dammit, I know that's not right...
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2003 10:52 pm
When the unarmed n helpless Reginald Denny
was being stomped in L.A., on nationwide TV,
from sea to shining sea, for almost an hour,
when any kick cud have been his last,
with the police having fled the scene,

I wonder if Wilso wud have been willing to counsel him
on the delights of being helpless and unarmed.


I wonder if Mr. Wilso wud have been willing to counsel
Kitty Genovese, while she was being repeatedly stabbed (to death)
in the streets of Queens, NY City, for about an hour,
n told her how much better off she
was in being unarmed n helpless.

While 12 year old Polly Klass, was bound n kidnapped by
knife wielding Richard Davis, later to be raped n killed,
wud our good Mr. Wilso have whispered in her ear how much better off
she was, in being unarmed n helpless
so that Mr. Davis had unimpaired discretion as to whether to rape n murder her ?


Is that Mr. Wilso's idea of "democracy" ?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Friends don't let friends fat-talk - Discussion by hawkeye10
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
 
  1. Forums
  2. » FREEDOM MARCHES ON !!!
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 11/26/2021 at 06:17:42