0
   

Satire : Muslim Barack with Gun-Slinging Michele Obama

 
 
engineer
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:11 pm
So what did all of you think about the story the cover was pointing to? Very interesting picture of a complete, master politician. From page 15:

Ryan Lizza, New Yorker wrote:
Like many politicians, Obama is paradoxical. He is by nature an incrementalist, yet he has laid out an ambitious first-term agenda (energy independence, universal health care, withdrawal from Iraq). He campaigns on reforming a broken political process, yet he has always played politics by the rules as they exist, not as he would like them to exist. He runs as an outsider, but he has succeeded by mastering the inside game. He is ideologically a man of the left, but at times he has been genuinely deferential to core philosophical insights of the right.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:22 pm
Written by (RL) - one of Obama's many brainwashed minions working for Liberal media.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:43 pm
http://www.tellingthoughts.com/asides/the-new-yorker-running-for-cover

The New Yorker / Running for Cover?
By john ⋅ July 14, 2008 ⋅ Email ⋅ Print ⋅ Trackback ⋅ Comment
A Telling Thoughts comment

It appears as though "The New Yorker" is now running for cover over their outrageous and highly defamatory Obama magazine front cover. Possibly grounds for a costly New Yorker payout after Senator Obama gets the election out of the way.

Below is the New Yorker cartoonist's response to an emailed complaint over the cover. It was posted early today by an Obama supporter MK, on one of the Obama site threads.


*******************************************************************************

New Yorker Cover Artist's Response to My E-mail | Report to Admin

By MK Today at 2:52 am EDT

Here is Barry Blitt's response to my e-mail expressing my hurt and distress at his New Yorker CoverÂ…

I am distressed to receive your email. All I can tell you is it was my intention to depict the
hideous innuendo and scare tactics circulated in the media as the ridiculous lies that they are.

My drawing was intended to appear preposterous and ridiculous. That it is being taken at
face value is very upsetting, and directly opposite to its intention. I am sorry for the hurt
it has caused. I cannot actually believe this cartoon, which was meant to mock the bigots
and xenophobes who spread lies, will actually give them license.

I hoped the image would get people talking about the falsehoods being spread about the Obamas.
I still hope that will be the case.

I am sorry once again.

Barry Blitt

================================
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:45 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
Written by (RL) - one of Obama's many brainwashed minions working for Liberal media.

Did you read it?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:46 pm
What exactly is defamatory about it, though?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:48 pm
Lash wrote:
What exactly is defamatory about it, though?


No halo maybe?
0 Replies
 
Gala
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:49 pm
Miichelle Obama as Angela Davis? Obama as Bin laden? It's a far cry from portraying Bush jr. as a dunce, or a cowboy.

There's so much racism--still.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:49 pm
You have been making me laugh, lately... Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Gala
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:52 pm
Butrflynet wrote:
http://www.tellingthoughts.com/asides/the-new-yorker-running-for-cover

The New Yorker / Running for Cover?
By john ⋅ July 14, 2008 ⋅ Email ⋅ Print ⋅ Trackback ⋅ Comment
A Telling Thoughts comment

It appears as though "The New Yorker" is now running for cover over their outrageous and highly defamatory Obama magazine front cover. Possibly grounds for a costly New Yorker payout after Senator Obama gets the election out of the way.

Below is the New Yorker cartoonist's response to an emailed complaint over the cover. It was posted early today by an Obama supporter MK, on one of the Obama site threads.


*******************************************************************************

New Yorker Cover Artist's Response to My E-mail | Report to Admin

By MK Today at 2:52 am EDT

Here is Barry Blitt's response to my e-mail expressing my hurt and distress at his New Yorker CoverÂ…

I am distressed to receive your email. All I can tell you is it was my intention to depict the
hideous innuendo and scare tactics circulated in the media as the ridiculous lies that they are.

My drawing was intended to appear preposterous and ridiculous. That it is being taken at
face value is very upsetting, and directly opposite to its intention. I am sorry for the hurt
it has caused. I cannot actually believe this cartoon, which was meant to mock the bigots
and xenophobes who spread lies, will actually give them license.

I hoped the image would get people talking about the falsehoods being spread about the Obamas.
I still hope that will be the case.

I am sorry once again.

Barry Blitt

================================


It's not the face value problem-- the intent was satire, and that's loud and clear, it's an unintended low-blow. Most white people simply do not understand the depth of the race issues in this country because they've never been judged for the color of their skin...
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 02:54 pm
Gala--

What exactly is wrong with the portrayals from a racial viewpoint?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 04:03 pm
Angela Davis? I thought she looked like Ted Nugent. She's black enough in the cartoon anyway.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 04:21 pm
cjhsa wrote:
Angela Davis? I thought she looked like Ted Nugent.
She's black enough in the cartoon anyway.


http://retrocrush.buzznet.com/archive2007/annoying/mckinney.jpg

I really think she looks alot like Cynthia McKinney in that cartoon Laughing Full size picture of the cover art
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 06:35 pm
engineer wrote:
So what did all of you think about the story the cover was pointing to? Very interesting picture of a complete, master politician. From page 15:

Ryan Lizza, New Yorker wrote:
Like many politicians, Obama is paradoxical. He is by nature an incrementalist, yet he has laid out an ambitious first-term agenda (energy independence, universal health care, withdrawal from Iraq). He campaigns on reforming a broken political process, yet he has always played politics by the rules as they exist, not as he would like them to exist. He runs as an outsider, but he has succeeded by mastering the inside game. He is ideologically a man of the left, but at times he has been genuinely deferential to core philosophical insights of the right.


"Paradoxical?"

That's a nice way to describe a snake oil salesman.

This whole flap is quite rich.

The cover was intended to make fun of Obama's critics, not Obama. The New Yorker is hardly a mainstream magazine, and if ignored by the Obama campaign wouldn't have made this splash in the much more widely consumed news media. As a result we can probably look forward to seeing this cover on t-shirts.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2008 11:55 pm
I guess I'm the odd man out on this topic. I got the satire immediately and found it amusing. I definitely agree it failed it's objective though.

I remember getting my hair cut a few months ago, and the lady said...

lady: "I sure like that Obama, but I don't think I would feel comfortable with voting for a muslim."

me: "He's not a muslim."

lady: "I don't know."

me: "What don't you know?"

lady: "I just don't know."

me: "There seriously is no controversy over this topic, he's a Christian."

lady: "Well... I don't know."

It was around that time I became alarmingly aware of how potent this rumor had become. It's the rumor that won't die. I thought for a while that possibly the Rev Wright non-sense would mean something if the public was to extrapolate the obvious.

Not everyone got it.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Tue 15 Jul, 2008 12:42 am
If I favored Obama for president, I don't believe it would bother me a bit. Since I don't, it still doesn't bother me.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Tue 15 Jul, 2008 01:41 am
Diest TKO wrote:
I guess I'm the odd man out on this topic. I got the satire immediately and found it amusing. I definitely agree it failed it's objective though.

I remember getting my hair cut a few months ago, and the lady said...

lady: "I sure like that Obama, but I don't think I would feel comfortable with voting for a muslim."

me: "He's not a muslim."

lady: "I don't know."

me: "What don't you know?"

lady: "I just don't know."

me: "There seriously is no controversy over this topic, he's a Christian."

lady: "Well... I don't know."

It was around that time I became alarmingly aware of how potent this rumor had become. It's the rumor that won't die. I thought for a while that possibly the Rev Wright non-sense would mean something if the public was to extrapolate the obvious.

Not everyone got it.

T
K
O


They create memes.

Like Goebbels.

It's way hard to get rid of memes.

What IS fun is that the likes of H2operson do not understand that the joke is on them.

Snicker.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Tue 15 Jul, 2008 06:01 am
Dlowan, stop humping H20man's leg.
0 Replies
 
Gala
 
  1  
Tue 15 Jul, 2008 06:09 am
Lash wrote:
Gala--

What exactly is wrong with the portrayals from a racial viewpoint?


Race in America...where to begin. Oh, perhaps slavery's a good place, or maybe lynching.
0 Replies
 
Gala
 
  1  
Tue 15 Jul, 2008 06:15 am
Diest TKO wrote:
I guess I'm the odd man out on this topic. I got the satire immediately and found it amusing. I definitely agree it failed it's objective though.

I remember getting my hair cut a few months ago, and the lady said...

lady: "I sure like that Obama, but I don't think I would feel comfortable with voting for a muslim."

me: "He's not a muslim."

lady: "I don't know."

me: "What don't you know?"

lady: "I just don't know."

me: "There seriously is no controversy over this topic, he's a Christian."

lady: "Well... I don't know."

It was around that time I became alarmingly aware of how potent this rumor had become. It's the rumor that won't die. I thought for a while that possibly the Rev Wright non-sense would mean something if the public was to extrapolate the obvious.

Not everyone got it.

T
K
O


Odd man? I think you flatter yourself. We get the satire, at least in this forum. The general public is another issue.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Tue 15 Jul, 2008 06:22 am
I'm just saying. I don't think I'm unique in this way. I was honestly surprised that the irony had to be explained. I picked up on the punchline immediately.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 12:44:45