@littlek,
littlek wrote:
Reyn, Do you know whay they went with radiation and not chemo? Glad you're healthy since!
Hi Kris, sorry I didn't get back to you sooner, but I'm back at work working full time these days.
The reason, in my case, why radiation was used, rather than chemo was because my cancer was still isolated in one part of my body (the exit of my stomach). Having said that though, they did not take any chances and radiated much of my lower torso, including all my organs, front and back.
I imagine they did this to hedge their bet about the diagnosis, just in case they were wrong.
Generally speaking, it is my understanding that chemo is used to either treat larger areas (shotgun effect) or areas where radiation is not practical or inaccessible, or just won't work. I may be wrong on that though.
The lymphomas are a tricky cancer, because it gets into the lymph system and can travel anywhere in the body fairly quickly. Therefore, if not caught early, the outcome can be devastingly depressing. Not to scare you, but, again, this was
my understanding that once one notices that they have symptoms, it can be quite uncertain as to "how much time one has" or if you'll be able to be "cured".
I take that last word with a
lot of caution, as it can lead to a false sense of well-being.
I am one of those "lucky ones" that oncologists consider "cured". What they don't tell you is that one may be open to other cancers way down the road due to the fact of compromised immune systems, or one may have been in a
very long remission due to a slow-growing cancer.
In the end, one can only hope for the best. In the case of young folks having cancer, it's very hard to take. Fingers crossed.