Please Answer This Question Obama Supporters

I think before Lash gives this any more momentum than it's really worth, it should be re-emphasized that had this been official campaign policy, Obama's past photo ops and rallies would have been devoid of any visible muslims--which they haven't. If he had an anti-muslim strand to his personality, politics or his philosophy then I'm sure after all the campaigning to date, this would have become transparently obvious by now.

That Lash wishes to assert, without qualification and without substantiated evidence that thisin fact official campaign policy, she is simply becoming yet another vile propagandist with the hopes of maintaining the deplorable status quo in American politics.

ok, cyclo.

we've also learned that after receiving a nasty post from someone in response to a nasty post from him.... he reports them for abusive language.

we've learned that cyclo likes to dish it out but can't take it.

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

we've also learned that after receiving a nasty post from someone in response to a nasty post from him.... he reports them for abusive language.

we've learned that cyclo likes to dish it out but can't take it.

Some of us has known that for some time.

I'm still interested in anyone's answer to my simple... non pugnacious or assertive question from anyone who cares to answer.

we've also learned that after receiving a nasty post from someone in response to a nasty post from him.... he reports them for abusive language.

we've learned that cyclo likes to dish it out but can't take it.

I agree that Obama's campaign acted incorrectly, but disagree that there is a pattern of doing so on his part - or that their apology was insufficient.

Cycloptichorn wrote:

I agree that Obama's campaign acted incorrectly, but disagree that there is a pattern of doing so on his part - or that their apology was insufficient.

A pattern of what? I agree there isn't a pattern of bigotry or anything like that. I do think there's a pattern of the left hand not knowing what the right hand was doing, and of Obama standing embarrassed as incapable of getting a grip on his own campaign. I don't think this will kill him. But it's a pattern, and it's a stain on his otherwise successful campaign.

Cycloptichorn wrote:

I agree that Obama's campaign acted incorrectly, but disagree that there is a pattern of doing so on his part - or that their apology was insufficient.

A pattern of what? I agree there isn't a pattern of bigotry or anything like that. I do think there's a pattern of the left hand not knowing what the right hand was doing, and of Obama standing embarrassed as incapable of getting a grip on his own campaign. I don't think this will kill him. But it's a pattern, and it's a stain on his otherwise successful campaign.

Cycloptichorn wrote:

'cept for the fact that you have no evidence it was a 'known policy' of the Campaign, Lash. You are making that up.

We have no evidence about a lot of things but it is reasonable to infer from the facts in this case that it was somebody's policy even if it didn't reach as high as the national campaign headquarters. Keeping in mind sozobe's point about dying by the sword of grassroots organizing and autonomy, it still seems reasonable that somebody higher up than the volunteers made a decision and communicated it.

why would it? It didn't sink Bill :wink:

how am I whining? I posted a legitimate question received a pm calling me a dick... and I called cyclo out on it. That ain't whining pal. Now let's drop it before the whole thread gets locked.