0
   

The UN, US and Iraq IV

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 11:17 am
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
McGentrix

Whist Walter is explaining his point, perhaps you could explain for my benefit what it is about Cuba that so annoys the USA.


Its a nice country full of amiable hispanic types who are determined to live their lives their own way. So they follow a communist/socialist doctrine different from the US. Why not? Does the US actually feel threatened by Cuba? Why still these (to my mind) silly restrictions on visiting and doing business with Cuba? I genuinely don't understand. [ok there was the issue of Soviet missiles, but at the same time the Soviet Union was surrounded by American missiles. And they're gone now along with the Soviet Union, so why still the continued animosity towards little Cuba?]


Read this.

It should answer your questions.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 11:19 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
In Cold War times, we had in Germany the so-called "Hallstein doctrine" :

A basic foreign policy principle of the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany from 1955 to 1969. According to this doctrine, the Federal Republic asserted the exclusive right to represent the entire German nation (Alleinvertretungsanspruch). It did not establish or maintain diplomatic relations with states that recognize the German Democratic Republic (DDR). (Exception: The USSR, as one of the victorious powers of World War II.) The doctrine is applied for the first time against Yugoslavia (1957), followed by Cuba (1963) and Arab countries (1965).

Even at those times, we could go everywhere - I've been in the GDR and East Berlin three times in the above mentioned period (one time with the Conservative Youth Laughing ).


Alright, I think I understand now. Your saying that even during the cold war, germans have had freedom to travel anywhere whilst American citizens have not. Gotcha.

How many times have you visited Cuba?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 11:20 am
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
Hmm that sounds very suspicious Walter. Conservative Youth was obviously a cover, what were you REALLY doing? lol


It was actually the cheapest and most easiest way to get there (they only asked me once, if I wanted to join.[I still wonder, why I was kind of alone after that :wink: .]
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 11:24 am
Until now: no time.

I'm not really the person for mass-tourism, you know.
Since Cuba is one of the German favourite holiday ressorts, I had to go on my own there - if I wanted to avoid being surrounded by Germans from German travel agencies.

However, individual travelling to Cuba is far too expensive for me.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 11:25 am
ok read it all. I see now, its all to do with mutual aid. The US feels indignant that the Cuban people should have to live under the Castro dictatorship, and Cubans in Florida reciprocate by subverting the democratic process to get Bush installed in the White House. Alles klar!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 11:35 am
Ain't demonocracy a wunnerful thing ? ! ? ! ?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 11:35 am
Actually, Cuba is quite enjoyable to visit, although escaping the oversight of those in charge is difficult,and can be dangerous for those whom one interacts with.
Walter, tons'o'Nordeuropa types (and I do mean tons..speedo should print a maximum density warning on its products! Shocked ) there. Lots of Aussies and British too.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 11:42 am
hobitbob

I know some dozens of them: mostly those, who had been banned at Mallorca Laughing (Well, not really, and I don't want to discriminate, but it's the cheapest holiday ressort outsite Europe.)
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 11:51 am
Think I might go myself. And they make some great music Bueno Vista Social Club etc...just going to play it now. And all their food is "organic" because of the US block on artificial fertilisers.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 12:35 pm
And their writers (and films) are wonderful. You can get there via Mexico, but lately there have been a couple of horror stories of the US gov catching up with travellers and fining them large sums. Go to Cuba, return to wunnerful free America, pay the bill for your "freedom."
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 12:49 pm
Found this in the Washington Post's travel pages:
Quote:
... it should be noted that if you don't have the blessing of the U.S. gov.and are going through Canada or some such, you can be fined if U.S. authorities find on your person souveniers that are clearly Cuban, or a ticket stub from the leg of your journey from say Jamiaca to Cuba.

from: Washington Post: Talk about travel
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 12:53 pm
Well, in all honesty, an economic boycott doesn't really work if people keep spending money there...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 01:03 pm
Not allowing because of an economic boycott - that would be impossible in Germany, since it would be a restriction of basic rights.
[Article 19 [Restriction of basic rights]
(1) Insofar as, under this Basic Law, a basic right may be restricted by or pursuant to a law, such law must apply generally and not merely to a single case. In addition, the law must specify the basic right affected and the Article in which it appears.

(2) In no case may the essence of a basic right be affected.
]
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 01:19 pm
Here are the rules governing travel to Cuba. http://www.destinationcuba.com/whocanvisit.htm
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 02:32 pm
Back to topic:

Quote:
"From the brief time that we did spend occupying Iraqi territory after the [1991] war, I am certain that had we taken all of Iraq, we would have been like the dinosaur in the tar pit -- we would still be there, and we, not the United Nations, would be bearing the costs of the occupation. This is a burden I am sure the beleaguered American taxpayer would not have been happy to take on."

---General Norman Schwarzkopf, "It Doesn't Take a Hero" (published in 1993)
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 02:36 pm
Doh...now you did it! Smile
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 03:19 pm
It seems a German bank is suing NY state for nine-eleven for $500,000,000.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 03:29 pm
The US killed 8 Iraqi police by mistake.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 03:40 pm
Quote:
Top Stories - Reuters
U.S. Kills 8 Iraqi Allies, Bush Seeks World Help
2 hours, 50 minutes ago

Add Top Stories - Reuters to My Yahoo!

By Fadhil Badran

FALLUJA, Iraq (Reuters) - U.S. troops killed eight U.S-trained Iraqi guards and a Jordanian on Friday after mistaking the Iraqis for rebels in the heartland of resistance to the American-led occupation, witnesses said.


Elsewhere in the rebellious "Sunni Triangle," where deposed dictator Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) may be hiding, two U.S. soldiers died, seven were wounded, and three Iraqis were reported killed in a botched raid in the town of Ramadi.

President Bush (news - web sites) kept up pressure on the international community to back up its 130,000-strong contingent in Iraq (news - web sites), saying free nations cannot be neutral in the "fight between civilization and chaos."

In a speech to returning American soldiers, Bush added: "Terrorists in Iraq have attacked representatives of the civilized world, and opposing them and defeating them must be the cause of the civilized world."

U.N. Security Council foreign ministers from veto-holding countries France, Britain, Russia, China and the United States, are due to meet in Geneva on Saturday to discuss a U.S.-drafted resolution to get more international troops and money into Iraq.

In the Iraqi town of Falluja, police officer Assem Mohammed told Reuters a joint force of the local police and the U.S.- backed security force were chasing thieves in a car shortly after midnight when U.S. soldiers opened fire.

"They continued firing for about an hour despite our pleas for them to stop and to tell them we are police and security," Mohammed, who was wounded in the incident, said from his hospital bed in Falluja, about 30 miles west of Baghdad.

Nearly 24 hours later, U.S. military authorities still had no official comment on what had happened. They did say U.S. forces had come under a rocket-propelled grenade attack in the area and one American soldier was wounded.

Other police officers confirmed Mohammed's report and put the toll at eight dead guards and three suspected bandits. At least six police and guards were also wounded.

HOSPITAL BADLY DAMAGED

The Jordanian military hospital in the area was badly damaged in the firing, its side peppered by bullets and shells. Spent bullet casings littered the road nearby, next to dried pools of blood.

An official at the hospital, set up in April to provide medical services to the Iraqi people, confirmed a Jordanian guard died of wounds he received in the incident.

The Falluja Protection Force was set up by the U.S. military with volunteers to help Iraqi police control the unruly town.

In the Ramadi incident, two U.S. soldiers were killed and seven wounded when an American force raided a house in the town, 100 km (60 miles) west of Baghdad in the U.S.-labeled "Sunni Triangle" where support for Saddam is strongest.

Pools of blood marked the sight of what witnesses described as a vicious gunbattle involving small arms and grenades in the early hours of the morning. In confused accounts, neighbors said three Iraqis also died.

"Look at the blood all over the house," housewife Samam Kadhim said. "This is the American behavior -- aggression toward Muslim houses."

Some two hours earlier, guerrillas had detonated a roadside bomb and fired small arms at a U.S. military convoy in central Ramadi, wounding two soldiers, a U.S. spokesman said.



Compounding a violent period even by Iraqi standards, police battled thieves in the center of Baghdad in the latest bout of lawlessness. And U.S. tanks entered Falluja's high street late afternoon in fighting where witnesses saw a five-year-old boy shot in the head.

U.S. CASUALTIES

Guerrillas have killed 71 U.S. soldiers since Washington declared an end to major combat in Iraq on May 1.

U.S. officials blame attacks on Saddam loyalists and foreign Islamist fighters.

Following Washington's appeal for help, more British troops left a base in Cyprus as part of London's buildup of its 11,000- strong contingent by an extra 1,200 soldiers.

But India turned down a U.S. request for it to send a division of at least 15,000 soldiers, arguing its forces were too busy fighting Islamic separatists in Kashmir (news - web sites).

France, Germany and Russia want to downgrade the U.S. role and have called for stronger U.N. participation in restoring Iraqi sovereignty.

In Geneva, U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) said the world body would maintain humanitarian operations in Iraq despite continuing threats after the bloody bombing of its offices in Baghdad last month.

"We should not abandon them in their time of need," Annan said.


Fro McGentrix, who was so proud of the Iraqi Pohleese the US had put in place. If we are just going to shgoot them without realizing they are on "our" side, why bother?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2003 03:44 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
It seems a German bank is suing NY state for nine-eleven for $500,000,000.



Seems that is done on request of the insurance companies:
Quote:

Deutsche Bank sues over Sept 11
12 September 2003
NEW YORK - Deutsche Bank has sued the US state of New York for more than USD 500 billion for damage done to its building in New York City after the September 11 terrorist attacks, a bank spokeswoman said Thursday.

Rohini Pagasam said the state's negligence led to damage to the Germany-based bank's building, which stands across from the former site of the World Trade Centre.

In its suit, filed Wednesday in federal court in Manhattan, Deutsche Bank said the building was a total loss. In a statement issued Thursday night, the bank added that it filed the suit because its insurance policies demand it pursue every potential claim against third parties.


The suit accused the state of failing to take steps necessary to protect and clean the 41-storey building after the suicide hijackings that caused the World Trade Centre to collapse.

Tens of thousands of gallons of water that the New York Fire Department pumped into the building to put out a fire were not removed and Deutsche Bank employees were barred from the building and could not undertake efforts to protect it, the suit charged.

But it added that the state did not sufficiently keep its own employees from the site, which led to the theft of hundreds, possibly thousands, of computers.

Today, the building at 130 Liberty Street is a shell covered in black netting with a 15-storey fissure in it, the suit said. Never before have environmental experts found such an extreme mixture of pollutants and mould in a single building, it charged.

At the end of August, a federal judge dismissed a similar USD 500 million suit brought by Deutsche Bank against New York City but ruled it could refile two charges in the original suit.

It was expected to shortly file another lawsuit against Allianz AG and AXA SA to demand both insurance companies take on their portion of the costs to tear down the New York building. Deutsche Bank is demanding USD 1.9 billion but said it was ready to settle for USD 1.05 billion.

Earlier, the insurance firms Chubb Corp. and Zurich Financial Services agreed to pay USD 530 million to Deutsche Bank.

Also on Thursday, a lawyer confirmed that Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Sudan and Syria were named in a lawsuit seeking USD 300 billion from al-Qaeda and its supporters to compensate victims of the September 11 terrorist attacks.

Eliot Feldman of the Philadelphia-based Cozen O'Connor law firm said the suit was filed on behalf of the families of 400 victims and several insurance companies, including American Re, for "wrongful deaths" and injuries.

The USD 300 billion includes USD 4 billion in insurance claims.

Feldman said that Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria and 500 other businesses and community groups named in the suit are included in the US State Department's list of entities that support terrorists.

He said that Saudi Arabia was named in the lawsuit because a minority of members of the House of Representatives - 200 members - had voted to add the country to the terrorism list, and because a Senate committee was also looking into the charges. The measure failed in the lower House.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/02/2025 at 10:02:23