0
   

The UN, US and Iraq IV

 
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Nov, 2003 08:36 pm
Thank you Gelis. That makes everything very clear. I guess.

Does Suzette need a suppository, or do I misunderstand the problem?
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Nov, 2003 08:48 pm
Put a small mustach on bush and tell me who he resembles. Sorta makes the hair stand up on the back of your neck don't it?

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/rdonlyres/E74479E3-F651-44AE-907E-1A936C7F9F1C/18696/ACBCD33ED6064B2D91BEA43F36132849.jpg
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Nov, 2003 09:41 pm
suzette

You're a very smart girl, and that's a very unsmart post. There's not a chance in hell any of us here are going to let you get away with identifying jews and Israeli government policy. So don't even try, or we'll start quoting all the Israelis who think Sharon's ideas are morally disgusting...and that's a lot of quoting.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Nov, 2003 10:55 pm
nimh wrote:
So why your childish insistence on "know[ing] the official estimate is 70-110K"? Is it just cause you dont want to be seen backing down, even on something totally trivial? I mean, really - would it actually impact the point you were making in any way at all to just go - 'oh, yeh, I missed that - it was 110k in the end, then, was it? I must have gone by the old figures still' ... ? What else could it be - resentment? contempt? - that makes you review figures from left to right that each say something between 100,000 and 200,000, and still go - oh yeh, those 70-110K people ... Is it just that you are too tempted by the chance to gratuitously annoy those lefties here, even if it means you have to go against your own sources, even when its just on some tiny, trivial thing?

<shakes head> Its not just bias - it's petty malevalence, is my take. Of course we cant always be there to juxtapose the actual facts, or the full text, etc, with your latest spin, so I'm sure it'll happen many times again. The topic? Totally unimportant. The message? Clear: utter disrespect.

The article I referenced stated both that esitmates of crowd size varied and that the demonstration was large considering it occurred on a weekday. My point was and is that Anti-Bush, Anti-US, Anti-War sentiment is not prospering. That is not spin, and pointing it out is not irreverent, irrelevant, untopical or disrespectful. Putting words in my mouth and/or ascribing malevolent motivation to my having offered an observation of factual condition might be all of that, except untopical. I wish I could say it was atypical, but it is not ... it is merely nit-pick-ical.


Steve wrote:
Please give an example of blatant anti semitism from a recognised left wing or liberal source. [or to save posting another diatribe as above, just point to the source]


I don't confine ideologic embarrassment to either Left or Right, nor will I dignify that intellectually bankrupt sewage by repeating it ... its pretty much the same sewage from The Left as that from The Right ... but since you seem to imply that The Left somehow is immune to that particular ethico-moral outrage, here is some relevant reading for you. Knock yourself out.

Quote:
Orianna Falaci observes:
... I find it shameful that virtually the entire Left, that Left which 20 years ago permitted a trade-union procession to place a coffin (a Mafia-like warning) in front of the synagogue in Rome, has forgotten the contribution of the Jews to the anti-fascist struggle: of Carlo and Nello Rosselli, for example; of Leone Ginzburg, Umberto Terracini, Leo Valiani, Emilio Serani; of women such as my friend Anna Maria Enriques Agnoletti, shot in Florence on June 12, 1944; of 74 of the 335 victims of Fosse Ardeatine; of the infinite other deaths under torture or in combat or in front of the firing squads; the friends, the teachers of my childhood and of my early youth. I find it shameful that, in part because of the fault of the Left-no, especially because of the fault of the Left (think of the Left that begins its congresses applauding the PLO representative in Italy, who represents here the Palestinians who seek Israel's destruction)-the Jews in Italian cities once again are frightened. And in French and Dutch and Danish and German cities, it is the same. I find it shameful that when the scoundrels dressed as kamikazes march, (Jews) shudder as they trembled in Berlin during Kristallnacht, that is, the night on which Hitler began the hunt of the Jews ...






Quote:
A cite from a YahooGroups article:
From: Sarah Blum <sblum@m...>

Here is an example of left wing Antisemitism from a list I am on. This is
very typical today. There is no civility and the anonymity of the net
seems to encourage this explosion of hate - which especially targets
the Jews and Israel. This is just raw hate.

There is a more intense hatred for Jews than prejudice against Blacks.
Many Blacks are also antisemitic. But the left has become a hate bucket
for all the malcontents and miscreants.

I think someone here was in denial about left wing antisemitism. I can
post more examples. The question should be not if, but why so many
hatemongers are attracted to the left in the first place?

Sarah

From: Joe <fasarius@y...>
Subject: Re: [CCCC-USA] [#] Rachel Corrie and USS Liberty plus other
slanders

The attack on the Liberty has been discredited? Because a jew denies truth
does not make it less true. Jews are the quintesential liars and thieves
of the human race and the most violent and vicious, as they feel all
nonjews are less than they are and to be used as chattel. The Liberty was
repeatedly attacked. Its radio messages were ignored or if one believes
the jews they did not hear the messages, RIGHT, the jews did not know
where the ship came from, RIGHT. The pilots did not know who they were
attacking, RIGHT. The jew pilots are capable and willing to kill children
around their civilian targets with the belief they are GODS warriors. The
jews do not want the simple truth of the death of Jesus to be plastered on
the movie screen. The jews FEAR truth, and always have. Anyone with
experience with jews knows they are evil incarnate.


IndyMedia Discussion Thread Dealing with Leftwing Antisemitisim

A book on the topic: The Socialism of Fools: Anti-Semitism on the Left

Just holler if you'd like more; The Web is full of it. You don't have look very hard, or even very far.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 12:52 am
I didn't understand Suzette's last post. Did anyone?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 01:51 am
McTag wrote:
I didn't understand Suzette's last post. Did anyone?


Especially this sentence makes me wonder

Quote:
...seriously, especially the Jewish kapos on this thread, who will back you up and confirm your every feeling and wildest wet dream about the Jews and about Israel...


I've never noticed that some surviving members from KZs are here as members.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 07:35 am
A really good news link site.

http://www.newsmax.com/links.shtml
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 07:56 am
Thanks for responding to my challenge Timber. I meant it seriously and I appreciate your response. I've looked at the links you supplied, my conclusions are as follows.

1. The terms left wing or right wing are not helpful in discussing political ideas on the extreme of either, however:
2. Whilst most overt anti-semitism appears to come from people who would describe themselves as on the right there are some on the extreme left who display a similar psychopathology. Such people deserve to be denounced for what they are i.e. racists.
3. To my knowledge, no established main stream political party which describes itself as left/liberal/centre left tolerates racism in any form, overt or covert.
3. The Jewish people are defined by their culture race and religion.
4. Zionism is a political philosophy which is held by some but not all Jews.
5. To equate anti-semitism with anti-Zionism makes no sense in logic or in practice. Firstly you are not comparing like with like e.g. apples with apples. It's comparing apples with pears, specifically comparing (dislike of) a people with (dislike of) a political philosophy. Secondly even assuming they could be directly compared, it is quite obvious that Zionism is a subset of the Jewish population as a whole, and not the other way round. It is therefore quite possible to be either a Jew or a non Jew and be anti Zionist, and it is an error in logic to assume that all non Jewish anti Zionists must be anti Semites. Try drawing a Venn diagram. My dislike of Zionism is quite incidental to the fact that it is Jewish, and implies nothing whatsoever about my like or dislike of the Jewish people as a whole.
6. The term "anti-semite" is frequently used by those with a distinct political agenda to frighten or silence legitimate opposition. It therefore suits the purposes of the likes of Ariel Sharon to blurr the distinction between anti Zionism and anti Semitism in the public mind.

Suzette...oh dear. Bad time of the month is it? Come down from the roof when you feel a bit better.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 08:19 am
Some good points, Steve. While Antizionism is not per se Antisemitism, however, the two often mingle indistinguishably. I'm not a proponent of or apologist for Israeli geopoloitical practice, by any means, as you probably realize. I do recognize that the Israelis wave the Antisemitism flag more enthusiastically than legitimately may be warranted, but I recognize too that Antizionism is not free of Antisemitism.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 08:21 am
Could we all agree that jumping to conclusions and "political correctness" often work together to narrow discussion?
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 08:26 am
Gelisgesti wrote:
A really good news link site.


Has been for years. Newsmax's editorial tone occasionally is grating even to me (though I'm a premium subscriber), but diregarding their sometimes-over-the-top Conservative bias, they do deeply mine The News.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 08:29 am
Tartarin wrote:
Could we all agree that jumping to conclusions and "political correctness" often work together to narrow discussion?

We sure as hell oughtta. Some seem to find that harder to do than do some others, though. Some folks are more comfortable the more conversation narrows to their preferences.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 08:50 am
Gelisgesti wrote:
A really good news link site.

http://www.newsmax.com/links.shtml


Yes, and here's something I saw there that I haven't seen elsewhere:

Quote:
Gen. Tommy Franks says that if the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 08:53 am
Kinda makes one wonder who might hit us. Is the rot coming from within or from the outside?
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 08:56 am
Here's Ridgeway's take on Franks' statement in the Village Voice:

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0348/mondo6.php
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 09:46 am
Quote:
I recognize too that Antizionism is not free of Antisemitism.


I think we've just about exhausted this. My take is simply that while it is possible to be in both camps at the same time, it is also possible to belong exclusively to one group. In fact it's possible to be a member of the one and distinctly hostile to the other...

Off now to get my Adolf Hitler uniform especially for Suzette...dear oh dear is that the time? and I haven't invaded Poland yet.. Shocked
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 10:00 am
Agreed, Steve.

Oh, Tart, in case it needs clarification, I'd like to say I'm giving the Franks statement, and its media treatment with the inevitable attendent hysteria from The Left, exactly the attention I figure it merits. To my mind, that was a very "General-ish" thing to say, and really, there's no "There" there, IMO. Patton wanted to re-arm the Wermacht and turn it against the Soviets, and MacArthur was all for nuking and invading China before he was fired by Truman pretty much precisely for voicing that opinion. At the hieght of The Cold War, Curtis LeMay argued we ought to let his Strategic Air Command take out the Soviets before they could take us out. Whatever else may be said, our military do not make our political decisions.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 10:03 am
Just back from "my" bookshop, where Shlomo Perel had a reading (well, actually the reading is tonight in my hometown's theatre, he was more or less just signing his books, people bought in this shop).

I wonder, if Suzette would call him a 'Kapo'?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 10:05 am
And all from "Cigar Affectionado"... I wonder what's being said in "Bazooka Bazaar"?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 10:10 am
In the same public service spirit which McT displayed in opening this thread, i've opened a new one . . . this one has gotten too damned long.

New US, UN and Iraq thread[/color]
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 12:15:59