0
   

Hillary Clinton for President - 2008

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 09:03 am
djjd62 wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
dlowan, you really don't get the inside joke on A2K do ya?

Nothing new there.


none of us get you


Yeah we do.


He IS a cartoon...or at least a caricature....
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 09:18 am
Starting the following day, Team Clinton developed a list of complaints almost as long as the marathon primary battle:

* She accused her rivals of "piling on" because she was the front-runner.
* She said last month sexist attacks on her have been "deeply offensive to millions of women."
* The media was unfair to her - and too easy on Obama. Just Monday, Bill Clinton denounced an unflattering story on him as part of "the national media's attempt to nail Hillary" and railed, "This has been the most rigged coverage in modern history."
* Debate moderators were unfair to her. "Can I just point out that in the last several debates, I seem to get the first question all the time?" she griped in February.
* Caucus-state rules were undemocratic and favored Obama's activist supporters.
* Obama outspent her.
* The Clintons were unfairly accused of playing the race card.
* Old pals like Ted Kennedy and Bill Richardson stabbed her in the back by endorsing Obama.
* If only Democrats had winner-take-all rules in states like the GOP does, she'd be the nominee.
* Last Saturday's party ruling on the Florida-Michigan mess cheated her.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/06/04/2008-06-04_hillary_clintons_got_no_shortage_of_excu.html

GET OUT YOU LOSER!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 10:41 am
oralloy wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
oralloy wrote:
nimh wrote:
oralloy wrote:
I am quite willing to vote a straight Republican ticket in general elections for the rest of my life if the Democrats disenfranchise me.

I dont think there's all that much chance of you doing anything else for the foreseeable future either which way.


I've only voted a straight Republican ticket once in my life so far.

I usually vote for some Republicans each time, but not a straight ticket.


I am curious. Who is the last Democrat you voted for?

((I am curious if "not-Republican" means Constitution party or worse))


Jennifer Granholm, 2002.


Doh!

I woke up this morning thinking I said 2002 in that post, and just decided to go check. And look at that -- I did.

That should read "Jennifer Granholm, 2006".

Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 11:15 am
WTF did you do that for?

I was in Oakland when she celebrated her victory. She was at the RenCen in Detroit, not in Lansing, where she works and lived. I was livid - my hosts couldn't understand my outrage. Detroit is just the shiznit, if you're a Democrat pandering to entitlement votes.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 11:35 am
cjhsa wrote:
WTF did you do that for?

I was in Oakland when she celebrated her victory. She was at the RenCen in Detroit, not in Lansing, where she works and lived. I was livid - my hosts couldn't understand my outrage. Detroit is just the shiznit, if you're a Democrat pandering to entitlement votes.


I always vote for Democrats when they aren't against the Second Amendment (or at least I used to -- my voting pattern is likely to change following my disenfranchisement).

I voted for her in 1998 (attorney general) because she seemed to have a good rating on guns. (The NRA gave her an A rating, even though it endorsed the Republican guy.)

I voted against her in 2002 because as attorney general, she fought the concealed weapons laws.

I voted for her in 2006 because in her first term as governor she changed her position and stopped opposing concealed carry.

When I said before that I voted for her in 2002, I was thinking 2006. Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 11:40 am
cjhsa wrote:
WTF did you do that for?

I was in Oakland when she celebrated her victory. She was at the RenCen in Detroit, not in Lansing, where she works and lived. I was livid - my hosts couldn't understand my outrage. Detroit is just the shiznit, if you're a Democrat pandering to entitlement votes.

The fact that she celebrated her victory in Detroit shows she was just "pandering to entitlement votes"?

Um, if she was celebrating her victory, there werent anymore votes to pander to, right? I mean, wouldnt that be after people voted?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 11:58 am
Another stalwart Clinton supporter defects - expressing dismay about her non-concession speech:


Quote:
Hilary Rosen: I Am Not a Bargaining Chip, I Am a Democrat

Senator Clinton's speech last night was a justifiably proud recitation of her accomplishments over the course of this campaign, but it did not end right. She didn't do what she should have done. As hard and as painful as it might have been, she should have conceded, congratulated, endorsed and committed to Barack Obama. Therefore the next 48 hours are now as important to the future reputation of Hillary Clinton as the last year and a half have been.

I am disappointed. As a long time Hillary Clinton supporter and more importantly, an admirer, I am sad that this historic effort has ended with such a narrow loss for her. There will be the appropriate "if onlys" for a long time to come. If only the staff shakeup happened earlier; if only the planning in caucus states had more focus; if only Hillary had let loose with the authentic human and connecting voice she found in the last three months of the campaign. If only. If only. I have written many times on this site about the talents of Hillary Clinton and why I thought she'd make a great President. [..]

So, I am also so very disappointed at how she has handled this last week. I know she is exhausted and she had pledged to finish the primaries and let every state vote before any final action. But by the time she got on that podium last night, she knew it was over and that she had lost. I am sure I was not alone in privately urging the campaign over the last two weeks to use the moment to take her due, pass the torch and cement her grace. She had an opportunity to soar and unite. She had a chance to surprise her party and the nation after the day-long denials about expecting any concession and send Obama off on the campaign trail of the general election with the best possible platform. I wrote before how she had a chance for her "Al Gore moment." And if she had done so, the whole country ALL would be talking today about how great she is and give her her due.

Instead she left her supporters empty, Obama's angry, and party leaders trashing her. She said she was stepping back to think about her options. She is waiting to figure out how she would "use" her 18 million voters.

But not my vote. I will enthusiastically support Barack Obama's campaign. Because I am not a bargaining chip. I am a Democrat.
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 12:02 pm
Wow...you vote for someone based on thier opinion of guns and gun ownership.

Incredible.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 12:26 pm
Charlie Rangel, a very close supporter, said on MSNBC that he is mystified as to why Hillary is still in the race. He hinted that he might nudge her to make the right decision when they talk later today.

She is just a distraction at this point. Terry McCauliiffe introduced her last night as "the next president of the United States." This is becoming surreal.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 12:29 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
Charlie Rangel, a very close supporter, said on MSNBC that he is mystified as to why Hillary is still in the race. He hinted that he might nudge her to make the right decision when they talk later today.

She is just a distraction at this point. Terry McCauliiffe introduced her last night as "the next president of the United States." This is becoming surreal.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 12:57 pm
http://cagle.com/working/080224/cagle00.gif
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 05:40 pm
OK that made me laugh Razz
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 06:18 pm
Seems like this might actually be drawing to a close on Friday:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/usa_politics_clinton_abc_dc;_ylt=AoAZjnhxLuKwjsQHCwekI_gb.3QA

Quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New York Sen. Hillary Clinton plans to drop out of the presidential race on Friday and cede the Democratic nomination to Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, U.S. media reported on Wednesday.
ADVERTISEMENT

Obama secured the Democratic presidential nomination on Tuesday night after a long, hard-fought primary battle with Clinton for the right to face Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona in the November 4 general election.

ABC reported that Clinton would hold an event on Friday flanked by supporters "in which we believe, all indications are she will concede the race, once and for all."
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 07:51 pm
I'd really really really like her to take this opportunity to put Bill out on the curb. Whatever she does next will be better without him. That'd be my free advice - if she's interested in any kind of political future.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 10:26 pm
cjhsa wrote:
http://cagle.com/working/080224/cagle00.gif


That one is about 3 or 4 months old isn't it? I remember seeing it soon after February 5th when Obama won that long string of caucus states.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 10:37 pm
ehBeth wrote:
I'd really really really like her to take this opportunity to put Bill out on the curb. Whatever she does next will be better without him. That'd be my free advice - if she's interested in any kind of political future.


Totally agree.

I might have had a more difficult time choosing between Barack and Hilary if that had already been in her history. She made it a lot easier. There was no way in heck I was voting for her if that meant also putting Bill back inside the White House.

It is also why she will not be offered the VP slot without both of them first being thoroughly vetted.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 04:43 am
Butrflynet wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
I'd really really really like her to take this opportunity to put Bill out on the curb. Whatever she does next will be better without him. That'd be my free advice - if she's interested in any kind of political future.


Totally agree.

I might have had a more difficult time choosing between Barack and Hilary if that had already been in her history. She made it a lot easier. There was no way in heck I was voting for her if that meant also putting Bill back inside the White House.

It is also why she will not be offered the VP slot without both of them first being thoroughly vetted.


It wasnt that many years ago that Bill being in the WH was the best thing to ever happen, according to the left and to liberals.
Are all of you finally seeing what the conservatives have been seeing since 1992?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 04:50 am
Yes, I for one can say that my view of Bill Clinton changed a lot after his fumbling indiscretions and inability to control his own lust even when it could have cost him his office.

But where is the admission from you and others that they've seen the light about Bush's follies?

That high and mighty tone you're taking is very incongruous, when one considers that you and many others still can't see the disaster of a presidency that Bush has been.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 04:52 am
snood wrote:
Yes, I for one can say that my view of Bill Clinton changed a lot after his fumbling indiscretions and inability to control his own lust even when it could have cost him his office.

But where is the admission from you and others that they've seen the light about Bush's follies?

That high and mighty tone you're taking is very incongruous, when one considers that you and many others still can't see the disaster of a presidency that Bush has been.


Show me where I have continued to support him.
I have said that he has screwed up and isnt the president I hoped he would be.

The difference is that I havent continued to blindly support him and his actions in defiance of the facts, unlike many that continued to support Bill irregardless of all of the facts about him that came out.

Yes, I do support some of Bush's plans, but not all of them.

Yes, I have spoken out when I think he was wrong, and I will continue to do so.

Now, if you can find even one post of mine that shows that I blindly support him on everything or have taken a "high and mighty tone" about Bush, please post it.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 07:03 am
ehBeth wrote:
I'd really really really like her to take this opportunity to put Bill out on the curb. Whatever she does next will be better without him. That'd be my free advice - if she's interested in any kind of political future.


Yep, I agree with this, too.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/06/2025 at 07:08:11